We asked Dr Cass if she thinks that teachers should be trained around being able to avoid overshadowing of underlying causation of distress in a child presenting as transgender.
Dr Cass: ‘100% agree that teachers should be given more training on how to manage children…1/
with gender distress. Gender distress doesn’t begin at the door of the NHS. Guidance should be provided to school staff on what they can do”
“A child in a supportive family, under any context, is going to have a better outcome than a child who isn’t…2/
One real problem is when schools enact a social transition without any communication with the family, which instantly puts a poorer outcome on that child.”
She continued - “Social transition is a powerful intervention. Whether it’s the right outcome for any one child is a…3/
complex decision to make. There’s real challenges if that decision is falling on/taken by teachers. If you have to give a child in school paracetamol, you would check with the family. Making decisions around gender distressed yp is a huge step for teachers to take unsupported 4/
Our concerns are mirrored in what Dr Cass said. We know that teachers are finding this difficult to navigate. They need more support and guidance that is balanced and evidence based. They need less input from one sided lobby groups because this is simply causing more concerns 5/
@scotgov guidance on supporting transgender pupils in schools misses the mark. It should be removed until the final #CassReview is published.
Where intimate care is required, the child and/or their parents views must be considered as paramount. 2 practitioners will usually be involved, however best practice is to use a same-sex practitioner for reasons of privacy, dignity and safety of the child. 3/
We carried out FOI’s to all local authorities to ask about training being carried out in schools by outside organisations. We are beginning to get them back now and working through them.
Already we are seeing a pattern developing that is concerning.
One LA confirmed that 4 schools in their area had signed up to receive training & resources from LGBT YS, with one school paying £450 to ‘have their work validated’.
We asked for copies of the resources/training and were sent what was used for a Pronoun Day lesson…
Within this resource, teachers are encouraged to consider whether they should use different pronouns in front of family. There’s a paragraph in bold which gives the warning “Revealing somebody’s pronouns without their consent can put that person at risk in certain circumstances”
When we wrote to the @SP_EHRCJ an area we highlighted that has received no coverage so far in evidence was the impact on schools. We specifically mentioned what this could mean for New Scots young people with religious beliefs that require single sex spaces.1/
We have concerns that lowering the age of eligibility for a GRC to 16, therefore enabling school aged young people to legally change their sex, will have unintended consequences not only on the protected characteristic of sex, but on religion, belief & disability too. 2/
“That is because it would disadvantage children from religions that mandate sex separation in intimate spaces, such as Orthodox Judaism and some strands of Islam, or indeed those with “gender-critical” beliefs (the belief that sex is binary, immutable and important).” 3/
We are looking into materials being developed for an Inclusive, Diverse & Decolonised Curriculum, in Edinburgh.
An example:
Lesbian - women who are sexually attracted to only other women. People may assume that this applies to only AFAB women. However, TW, can also be lesbian
What message does this send to girls coming to terms with being same sex attracted? How will these definitions be adopted into the curriculum?
Lesbians are exclusively same sex attracted & shouldn’t be shamed into thinking males can be lesbian on fear of ostracism & exclusion
Another;
Misgendering - … This can also be considered a micro aggression, a passive aggressive act on the part of the person doing the misgendering.
Children & teachers should not be compelled to speak in a way that doesn’t align with their own beliefs. This isn’t aggression.
If you are a teacher and a child tells you that they are questioning their gender, it would be the exception not the rule to decide not to share this information with parents.
If you suspect a child will be at risk if you share with parents, you have a duty to consider why 1/
* what are my reasons for deciding not to share this information?
* what harm could result if I DO NOT share?
* what are the implications for the child, for you, for your school if you don’t share?
2/
Confidentiality is NOT an absolute right. If a child makes a disclosure to you, about their gender, abuse, bullying, family concerns or ANYTHING that could adversely impact them, you should be reminding them that you can’t promise to keep this secret.
3/
They advertise as “a student society giving comprehensive and inclusive sex and relationship education to schools”
Teachers can request that these university students come into the classroom, or youth and sport groups, to deliver this training. If there are no groups near your school, check again later as more and more are popping up, they tell us.