Marcin @Wyrwal of onet.pl has published a fascinating piece on how Ukrainian software developers are using artificial intelligence (AI) to improve the aim of their bomber drones. It deserves attention in English, so here's a 🧵 to summarise it. /1
I've previously written about Ukraine's drone warfare tactics - see below: /2
Marcin reports that Ukraine's large community of software developers have put their skills to use to resolve a key problem for drone pilots: identifying and accurately hitting camouflaged Russian targets. /3
The developers are working for the Ukrainian military's 'Delta' initiative, which seeks to find technological ways of fighting the Russian invasion. The military sets tasks which development teams try to find solutions for. /4
Two developers had worked before the war on scanning objects for commercial purposes. Colleagues who went to the front lines highlighted the difficulties they faced in targeting hidden Russian hardware. The developers realised their AI tools could be used to defeat camouflage. /5
The drone videos what it's seeing with its camera. The developers' AI system automatically recognises camouflaged enemy equipment and marks it with the precise geographical coordinates. The data is sent both to the drone operators and the commander in the field. /6
Assuming the drone is armed, the commander can then order an attack. Using a small improvised bomb, such as one of these RKG-1600s (a 1950s anti-tank grenade adapted with a new 3D-printed plastic tail fin), the drone can strike and destroy even a main battle tank. /7
The shot is taken from an altitude of about 100m (300 ft). Drones often carry several bombs. The first is often used as a test drop before the drone corrects its position to hit the target directly. /8
Some drones carry up to 4 bombs, meaning they can attack at least 2 targets on each flight. (Marcin doesn't mention if AI is also used for targeting refinement but I suspect it may well be.) /9
The drones themselves are cheap - costing $15,000-20,000 - and the bombs cost only about $1,000 each. As Marcin's interviewees point out, this costs far less than a main battle tank or armoured personnel carrier. /10
Interestingly, the developers say that their drones are resistant to Russian electronic warfare due to the use of a proprietary navigation system that doesn't rely on GPS. The drones can also engage a kamikaze mode to fly into targets deemed important enough. /11
The developers also point out a fundamental difference between the Russian and Ukrainian approaches to drone development. Russia has a state-led unified approach in which big companies develop a limited number of systems like the Orlan-10 to standardised designs. /12
In contrast, Ukraine's "civic movement of software professionals" has created many independent systems, often operating on completely different principles, using completely different protocols. It's a heterogeneous bottom-up approach, in contrast to the top-down Russians. /13
This gives Ukraine a qualitative advantage, both in terms of more rapid development cycles and in terms of creating a more diverse ecosystem of many different types of drones, in contrast to Russia's reliance on just a few types. /14
It's thus easier for Ukraine to work out how to hack Russia's older and less diverse drone fleet than it is for Russia to counter the many different types of drones being rapidly developed and fielded by the Ukrainians. /15
And Ukraine's capabilities are constantly improving. The team interviewed by Marcin currently flies drones which can carry up to 3 kg and can fly up to 10-15 km. They are developing drones which can fly up to 50 km with a load of up to 20 kg. /16
That's enough summarising - go and read Marcin's article (or use Google Translate) for the rest. onet.pl/informacje/one…
And see the link below for more information on these AI-driven drones and how to donate to support the developers: saker.airforce
The drone operators interviewed by Marcin also need a new pickup truck, as the one they're using now has been shot up by the Russians. Details on how to contribute here: zrzutka.pl/z/pickupdrony
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1/ Russian warbloggers are continuing to provide examples of how Telegram is used for frontline battlefield communications, to refute the claim of presidential spokesman Dmitri Peskov that such a thing is "not possible to imagine". ⬇️
2/ Platon Mamadov provides two detailed examples:
"Example number one:
Aerial reconnaissance of Unit N spotted a Ukrainian self-propelled gun in a shelter in the middle of town N."
3/ "Five minutes after the discovery, the target's coordinates and a detailed video were uploaded to a special secret chat group read by all drone operators, scouts, and artillerymen in that sector of the front.
1/ Russian soldiers overwhelmingly prefer to use Telegram for tactical communications despite the Russian army having its own dedicated military messengers. The reason isn't complex – the military's own alternatives are unreliable and difficult to use. ⬇️
2/ 'Vault No. 8' explains the problem:
"The Telegram slowdown is particularly nasty because Telegram is used for communication on the front lines.
Military messengers have been around since I wrote about this, but... Guess what you have to do to get a firmware-ready smartphone?
3/ "That's right! Buy it [with your own money] and send it in for a firmware update. On top of that, one of the military messengers periodically crashes like crazy, and the phone has to be sent in for a [periodic] firmware update, which takes at least a couple of weeks.
1/ The Russian government's throttling of Telegram has deprived the Russian army of a huge repository of information for its soldiers' professional development and a key source of essential technical advice and instruction, as Russian warbloggers explain. ⬇️
2/ 'Kiba's Signalman's Diary' explains:
3/ "Telegram alone has been the only place where self-organised closed chats and knowledge bases on communications, in demand by the military at the moment, were quickly created and developed, independent of decisions and initiatives from above.
1/ Russian warbloggers are outraged at the Russian government's view that blocking Telegram is no big deal for frontline troops. They say it's a catastrophe heaped on the disaster of losing Starlink and that anyone who says Telegram isn't needed is talking "complete bullshit". ⬇️
2/ Dmitri Peskov, Vladimir Putin's spokesman, says: "I don't think it's possible to imagine frontline communications being provided via Telegram or some other messenger. It's difficult and impossible to imagine such a thing."
3/ However, it is very much a thing, as warbloggers have been pointing out furiously. 'Callsign Bruce' provides an example of how it is used to avoid friendly fire incidents:
"I'll give you a real-life example from one of the directions."
1/ Life after Starlink is proving to be difficult and frustrating for the Russian army. Russian warbloggers appear to be going through the stages of grief, expressing anger and alarm at the crisis and concern that Ukraine will exploit it. One anticipates "24/7 fucking". ⬇️
2/ Further instances of price-gouging are being reported, with the cost of US-made Ubiquiti WiFi bridges – illegally imported into Russia – doubling overnight. 'Strong Word' complains:
3/ "Elon is certainly a real jerk. But we have some real assholes in the rear who decided to ride the wave and make money off their own soldiers. Wi-Fi bridges instantly doubled in price. It's maddening, some are spilling blood, and others are making a living off of it."
1/ What can Russian soldiers do with thousands of useless Starlink terminals? One Russian warblogger has some humorous suggestions. ⬇️
2/ 'BKGB Casuar' writes:
"Here are 10 ways to use a broken terminal in the Special Military Operation zone:
3/ "1. Butt Kick.
The ground in the trench is cold and damp, and Elon Musk's plastic is warm and high-tech. Use it as an elite seat. Now you're not just a soldier in the mud, but a cyberpunk on a throne, whose butt is protected from moisture by American technology.