Key takeaways from this (mainly Conservative inclined group)

-terror/fury about economy, about winter to come.
-short shrift for ‘culture war’ issues in that context: “what’s that got to do with me?” Sole focus cost of living
-desperate to hear about policies to deal with it.
Damage to Conservative brand as a result of the Johnson scandals is real. Feeling was Tory MPs had left it too long.

As a result new broom candidates went down best. Sunak problems real, both because voters in this group associate him most with BJ but also because of economy.
Most had seen the Sunak working class video, which went down badly. Generally the feeling was that none of Westminster had a clue about how bad things were on cost of living but he was most out of touch of all. Non-dom issue regarding his wife came up as well.
Again on Sunak: "if you’d asked me six months ago I’d have said yeah but not now." Another: "he's leagues away from average person. There's a huge class divide." Agreement was he was polished but damaged.
Only Sunak and Truss were known by the group. Truss was also well known for "those gaffes" which many had seen on TikTok (role and power of funny videos much underplayed in how many voters interpret modern politics).
None of the candidates especially interested the group, though Tugenhadt and Badenoch went down best. As I say, those who are unknown have a genuine opportunity to reach voters, as they're so desperate for direction and ideas, but they'll have to have something to say.
What was striking is how flat 'culture war' issues were, how removed so much of the SW1 conversation which dominates politics and a fair bit of the media really is, despite fact it's often done in name of 'real people'. Any clip where a candidate talked about those issues tanked.
And that's because people felt these are convos they just can't afford to have. They spoke of gas/elec projected bills of £3500+. Deep foreboding about the winter ahead and economic catastrophe. Having to take on second jobs. The gap between public & Westminster never felt wider.
"What they've given my family doesn’t cover barely any of my costs." Another on energy: "what they’ve given me is enough to cover a 1.5 months of my new bill." And: "they need to focus on the working class, we’re not idiots, just because we’re not wearing a suit and not posh."
Also striking was in this Brexit voting group how uninterested they were in the subject now: "it's done." Again, they saw it as a distraction from cost of living and didn't want to hear politicians talking about it any more.

Also again, world away from the contest.
I cannot overemphasise, not just from convo with this group but voters elsewhere just how a) pessimistic people are about their own future and country's future b) the disconnect (ok, always there) between Westminster and public c) deep weariness after years of crisis.
Btw this disconnect spans across Westminster. No great sense from this group Starmer or Labour has the answers- though naturally because Conservatives have been govt for so long, they draw most of the ire.
Btw this may be striking given where the SW1/Westminster conversation is at but it's not remotely surprising. As anyone who has ever struggled to put food on the table or pay a bill knows, when that's the situ you're in of course, it's all you care about.
just one focus group but supported by wider experience and polling. Danger of contest for party, country and media is the candidates/SW1 end up having a conversation in a parallel world to voters, which itself intensifies sense of distance between political class and public.

END
By way of illustrating this further, one of the women at the focus group said she’s already had to tell her kids this winter she won’t be able to have the central heating on much. They don’t believe her.
What is interesting is that the “oh they’re just talking to Conservative members” analysis doesn’t work because, as polling shows, Tory members actually aren’t that far removed from the public on what they care about right now. SW1 conversation is more elite and narrow still.
If you want to see the piece in full you can watch it here. Produced @caithanrahan shot/edited (in record time) Jamie Bowles and Jonathan Callary and featuring @Moreincommon_ ‘s own @LukeTryl whose team assembled the group.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Lewis Goodall

Lewis Goodall Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @lewis_goodall

Jul 14
NEW: Attorney General Suella Braverman eliminated from Conservative leadership contest.
RESULTS IN FULL (+change with yesterday)

Sunak: 101 (+13)
Mordaunt: 83 (+16)
Truss: 64 (+14)
Badenoch: 49 (+9)
Tugenhadt: 32 (-5)
Braverman: 27 (-5)

Tugenhadt/ Braverman lose votes. TT still in but perhaps won’t fit long on that basis. Front runners picking up fairly evenly.
Looking at bottom three most votes up for grabs are on the right. Sunak can *probably* pick up enough from TT to get over line but not necessarily assured of coming first…it’s bitty, this contest
Read 5 tweets
Jul 14
Rishi Sunak asked on Today whether he accepted he made a political misjudgment and u-turn over Marcus Rashford school food vouchers row in 2020

“No, we actually decided to find the holidays, activities and food programme.”
Is a matter beyond dispute that the government did make u-turn under pressure from Rashford at the time.
Sunak: “Conservatives believe in hard work and aspiration, that’s my story…if I’m prime minister I’ll be standing up for those sorts of values with vigour.”
Read 10 tweets
Jul 12
this all comes down to the wording of the motion. If it’s a standard no confidence motion it would be entirely improper and unconstitutional for govt to deny. If worded to be critical of individual ministers, or designed to test conf in PM specifically, it could be ruled out. Image
Labour pointing to this precedent from 1965 when Ted Heath tabled a motion of no confidence against Harold Wilson’s govt: “That this House has no confidence in HMG and deplores the Prime Minister’s conduct of the nation’s affairs.” This was ruled in order and govt won the vote. Image
Govt will say that isn’t precedent because that motion was no confidence *and* while Labour’s is apparently confidence *while*, Ie no confidence in BJ as PM rather than confidence of govt as a whole.
Read 12 tweets
Jul 12
The 2016 Conservative leadership election was fought in the shadow of shock. 2019 confusion and despair. Clear already the danger for the party is that 2022 is fought in aggression, recrimination and acrimony.
Other difference that 2016 and 2019 the departing PM didn’t play much of a part, even behind scenes, nor did they do so in the politics which followed. To put it mildly neither is guaranteed with Boris Johnson.
Bitterness also more likely because for the first time it feels like a genuine contest. 2016 there wasn’t a contest in the end. 2019 Johnson was all bit guaranteed, this time it’s all to play for.
Read 4 tweets
Jul 11
The interesting thing about these first part of the Conservative leadership contest is that Sunak has established himself as the early front runner. Not at all obvious this would have been the case even a week ago, or less.
This with MPs at least, membership another question.
Feels like part of it is this. Being one of the earliest movers has helped much improve his chances, which had started to look poor within the Cabinet.
Read 4 tweets
Jul 9
Rounding off an epic week of politics by presenting @BBCPM today. Join us for

-latest on Conservative leadership contest with @julianknight15 and @PaulGoodmanCH
-presidential palace is stormed in Colombo, we’ll hear about 🇱🇰’s spiralling humanitarian crisis
-and of course, 🎾
Radio 4, 1700- put us on over the barbecue
Culture Select Committee @julianknight15 tells me briefing in Tory leadership contest should stop, colleagues should “take a chill pill”, and says he would like to see the whole leadership process accelerated.

On Andrea Jenkyns’ says that “it’s not appropriate.”
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(