Fabio Rojas Profile picture
Jul 14 17 tweets 3 min read
1/ How to grow a nice juicy CV. Advice for folks at the beginning of the career (with a focus on #sociology).
2/ Before I get into it, a disclaimer: my advice is not relevant for people not focused on publishing, who work in a handful of elite programs, and subfields/methods where there is an emphasis on a few high impact pubs. I will get to these at the end of the thread.
3/ Still, this thread applies to folks teaching in most PhD programs, MA programs, or teaching intensive school that want a balance of research and teaching at time of promotion.
4/ Step 1: Assume that you will *ALWAYS* have 3-4 pieces under review. The rule of thumb among old timers is that if you want one decent hit, you need to have at least a few under review. There is simply too much chaos in the journal system to rely on 1 submission.
5/ Step 2: Assume that your dissertation will definitely produce at least 1-2 strong articles. These should be under review during your PhD, or very soon there after. Thus, "3 paper" dissertations are the default (but not a hard rule).
6/ Step 3: Get friends/advisors to help you co-author. You can join an existing teams or start you own. They idea is to expand your "pipeline."
7/ Step 4: Learn the procedure of writing 25-30 page articles. This is the "unit" of most social science and you can usually produce 1-2 per year.
8/ Step 5: Submit and resubmit. This is the secret sauce. After speaking to big publishers for decades, one theme jumps out - to be successful, you just need to keep submitting ... a lot.
9/ Once you get these basic publishing basics internalized, there are some more subtle pieces of advice.
10/ Target newer journals: Few submissions, not so rigid in terms of what they want.
11/ Edited volume/ encyclopedia entries: If you already know the topic and requires little work aside from just busting out the text, a few of these are helpful. Once in a while they hit big. You can also use them to publish less popular arguments.
12/ Special issues: *Sometimes* these will be a little easier to get into than the regular issue of the journal. Check it out if it fits.
13/ Open access: Soc Science, PLoS One, and Socius - and others. A few pubs in here help as well.
14/ Disclaimer #1: Elite departments - the top 10-15 programs often obsess a few journals. If you mindlessly follow my advice, you're actually worse off. So stick to the "special journal list" and you will have a shorter but more acceptable CV.
15/ Disclaimer #2: Subfields - a few subfields (e.g., ethnography) are built around people getting few pubs but higher impact ones or they dump it into the book. So don't follow this advice if you are in such a field!
16/ Disclaimer #3: Super teaching intensive - if this is your career goal, take this advice carefully. Still, if you are trying to hit a fixed number of pubs so you can switch to full time teaching, this might work.
17/ Bottom line: It may look mysterious when you start, but building a solid portfolio of work can be done in a predictable and systematic way.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Fabio Rojas

Fabio Rojas Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @fabiorojas

May 17
1/ This thread will be about DuBois, national socialism, and Hitler.
2/ In July 1941, W.E.B. DuBois published an 6 page article in the Journal of Negro Education presenting his view of the European war. I will provide background then summarize, read closely, and comment on this article. To download, click here: jstor.org/stable/2292742…
3/ Background: The JoNE published an annual yearbook where leading writers were invited to comment on issues of the day. Chas. H Thompson asked people to reflect on the European war especially as it relates to repressed people. jstor.org/stable/2292735…
Read 32 tweets
May 16
1/ Beyond the perfect game: exploring #baseball rules through insnaely good #pitching.
2/ Perhaps the entry level of good #pitching in #baseball is the shut out - no batter rounds the bases and no points are scored.
3/ One level above is the no-hitter: the game is complete yet no batter gets a hit. Theoretically, and in practice, your team can still lose! sportingnews.com/us/mlb/news/pi…
Read 18 tweets
Apr 18
1/ We’re going to talk about DuBois’ Stalinism and his broader authoritarian streak.
2/ Background: DuBois scholars have long known that DuBois was a huge Stalin fan, right up to the end of his life. But the topic has been downplayed and avoided in many circles.
3/ Why is this important to explore? Historically, you want the most robust and truthful account of someone’s life - warts and all.
Read 26 tweets
Sep 13, 2021
1/ Nitty gritty workflow management tips for academically minded folks.
2/ Background: Last week, I explained how to build an academic career without going bananas. This week, I'll give a few "micro tips" about workflow. As usual, take with a grain of salt - nothing works for everyone.
3/ Tip #1: Every two months or so, I make a google doc with a name like "Stuff to do in June 2021." And I mercilessly list all activities from the smallest to the biggest.
Read 26 tweets
Sep 10, 2021
1/ How to be productive and not insane. Comments: on sustaining scholarly work over the long run.
2/ Background: Last year, a student at pro-seminar asked how I was to have such a healthy CV. Here is my answer.
3/ First, the size of the CV is partially an artifact of age. If you hang in there and keep at it, the CV just grows with all kinds of items.
Read 14 tweets
Jun 30, 2021
1/ Why I am a deep peer review skeptic, even though I'm a journal editor and my articles (sometimes!) make it through peer reviews.
2/ Background: @khberglund drew my attention to this article that reviews problems with peer review. And they are many! Let me tell you about them... elemental.medium.com/amp/p/1d58e5d9…
3/ Perhaps the most fundamental problem is that peer review is not reliable in the sense that peer reviews are weakly correlated with each other. A famous study by Peters and Ceci is a great example...
Read 10 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(