Still waiting on SEC's filing but so far...1st, J. Torres is not going to reverse her amici ruling. SEC's backhanded reconsideration motion: DENIED. 2nd, did Ripple team forget what the motion is about? Providing Mr. Doody's report to amici to participate in Daubert...1/4
https://twitter.com/FilanLaw/status/1549492826412617734
...motions, yet Ripple team explicitly took no position on that (though did say it wants amici in dispositive stage). Weird. 3rd, nice job on the first 2 arguments--tell Court defendants threatened as well, and remind Court of multi-billion dollar pain inflicted on everyday...2/4
...#XRPHolders by SEC. 3rd, SEC made a "mistake" in not designating report confidential? I would have to imagine J. Torres thinking to herself, 'Just like the "mistake" you made when you first said Hinman speech was personal?.' 4th, if SEC brief accuses Ripple team of lying...3/4
...and disclosing to @JohnEDeaton1, it better prove it or J. Torres will be pissed about such a serious accusation.
Bottom line prediction: Amici participates but maybe not in Daubert round, but does get access to some discovery provided counsel signs Protective Order. 4/4
Bottom line prediction: Amici participates but maybe not in Daubert round, but does get access to some discovery provided counsel signs Protective Order. 4/4
PS: Can't believe I forgot to add this--Brief confirms SEC did not have its expert interview ONE SINGLE #XRPHolders!!! That is just lazy and undisciplined. I could go into detail on how bad SEC messed up here but I'm pretty sure it is monitoring my account so no freebies.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
