It started off with promise then predictably descended into a quagmire of disinformation, propaganda & lies. Much like the associated Daily Fail write up. 🙄🤷♂️ dailymail.co.uk/health/article…
2) Since the #BBC lied and mis/disinformed in their press release(s) running up to #unvaccinated, like @_InThisTogether I had little hope of unbiased reporting - I was expecting pro "vaccine" propaganda and was not disappointed! 🙄 iaindavis.com/the-farcical-b…
@_InThisTogether 3) A major criticism of the publicity about the programme was the false numbers quoted of unjabbed, as low as 3 million?! According to gov.uk data there are 9.4M people (approx 1 in 5) with zero jabs & over 18M (1 in 3) with no "booster".
@_InThisTogether 4) The programme did mention a survey of 2,500 people of which approx 600 were unjabbed (I can't find this online). If participants for this were selected at random (who knows?) then this itself contradicts the numbers of unjabbed quoted by #BBC and across mainstream media.🙄
@_InThisTogether 5) Having had contact with @nazarinveronica, @vickyborman & @luca_lucaboi prior to broadcast, I assume that a lot of what was said was left on the cutting room floor? Did Nazarin not mention her grandma's suspicious stroke after the jab, did Luca not mention his grandad's injury?
@_InThisTogether@nazarinveronica@vickyborman@luca_lucaboi 6) I'll leave that for them to discuss. Luca was made out to be a conspiracy nutjob focussing on "microchips", etc. Was this taken out of context? Vicky was made out to be unreasonably agressive - I'm surprised any of them stayed calm during child like jelly bean illustrations!
@_InThisTogether@nazarinveronica@vickyborman@luca_lucaboi@ukcolumn 11) EVEN MORE SHOCKINGLY one of the "experts" claimed not only that the "vaccine" could protect the infant from "covid-19" for 6 months after birth, but that the jab could actually REDUCE he chance of miscarriage/stillbirth. I'd love to see the "scientific" evidence of this? 🙄😡
@_InThisTogether@nazarinveronica@vickyborman@luca_lucaboi@ukcolumn 15) That's about all I've got time for. I could go on for hours citing misinformation and indepednent sources refuting it, but I'll leave it to professional independent journalists of which there are many. I'm looking forward to coverage from @GBNEWS and especially @ukcolumn 😃
@_InThisTogether@nazarinveronica@vickyborman@luca_lucaboi@ukcolumn@GBNEWS 16) FWIW I salute the seven brave participants in this programme and think the bias and disinformation by #BBC shines through - I think even many pro-"vaccine" people will see through it. I think it will further reduce the already crumbling credibility of the #BBC, so all good!
@_InThisTogether@nazarinveronica@vickyborman@luca_lucaboi@ukcolumn@GBNEWS 17) Disclaimer: I'm not a medical professional or "expert" in any of this, and nothing I say should be considerded medical advice. I'm just passionately interested in "covid", which I consider to be the biggest organised crime in the history of the world.
Thanks for reading😎
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1/x URGENT: JCVI Membership change.
Not just @rwjdingwall, but a total of 4 members removed from the JCVI COVID-19 sub-committee:
Prof. Bryan Charleston (Pirbright Institute)
Prof. Lucy Yardley (Uni of Southampton)
Prof. Robert Dingwall (Not. Trent Uni.)
Prof. Liz Miller (LSHTM)
2/x From a quick search I can't find anything about the other three's stance on "vaccinating" children, but Robert Dingwall was outspoken against it. 👍
Can anyone shed light on the other three? I suspect they too were against it and therefore a barrier to the jab agenda? 😢
Current website, scroll down for the COVID-19 sub-committee members.