The post-pandemic economic struggle was not a foregone conclusion. The inflation driven by govt spending (demand) would have settled naturally if left alone. It was/is the intentional Build Back Better agenda -targeting energy (supply side)- that exploded economic turmoil.
Central banks & Fed have raised interest rates into a global economy that is already contracting due to the new western world collective energy policy (BBB).
Interest rates can only impact demand side. Demand was/is already dropping. Hence, contraction or recession increases.
The economic contraction is intended. The aligned central banks & Fed actually want a drop in economic activity and a global recession. It is the only way their action can support the Political and WEF coordinated political policy side.
By forcing the economy (nationally and globally) into a contraction, they reduce energy demand.
Out of work people don't buy stuff. Manufacturing and businesses slow/stop producing. Demand overall drops.
This outcome reduces use of energy. Which is the goal during transition.
When the economy shrinks, oil prices drop, energy prices drop, people and businesses use less resources.
The bankers are supporting the goals of the policy makers by contracting economic growth and dropping the demand on energy.
When the economy shrinks, oil prices drop, energy prices drop, people and businesses use less resources.
The bankers are supporting the goals of the policy makers by contracting economic growth and dropping the demand on energy.
The central banks and Fed will deny this. They will deny their intent is to drop economic activity, because to admit that plan is to reveal their agenda. They will continue pretending, using the justification of their targeting inflation. It's a ruse.
The banks say they are trying to control inflation, but it's the energy policy creating the inflation, not demand. They know this. They know this to a certainty. Yet, they must deny this.
They are intentionally managing, & simultaneously creating, a purposeful global recession.
The bankers' instructions from the WEF are to reduce energy demand by managing the global economic decline.
That is what is happening, and why people are suffering.
This showcases the "western govt" entrenched and collective commitment to global climate change.
Once the bankers can get the economic activity lowered, their next phase of the managed energy transition is to step in and replace the missing economic activity with more govt spending.
You have to understand how these WEF people operate.
The jobs, businesses and workers who will suffer from the purposefully created recession, will need support to survive.
That's where the next round of govt spending and bailouts come in. It is a self-fulfilling prophecy.
This is what CB's/WEF/Govt call "managing the transition."
Banks: Raise rates. Lower economic activity. Drop energy demand.
Govt: Spend on BBB. Use bank caused drop in energy demand as bridge period. Spend on subsidies to replace collapsed economic activity they created.
This is all being done by design. Economic collapse is a feature, not a flaw of the transition.
The transition period will extend for many years, perhaps decades. It has only now just begun.
/END
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
It’s not just them. Really think about it, shift the paradigm, and OMG 😳 it all makes sense.
What the FBI does, and what the FBI doesn’t do. Use this reference and every single example reconciles, like a fuzzy picture that suddenly becomes clear
1) The people who installed the current occupant of the White House; that's the people who control the "presidency" of Joe Biden; have this to say about their intent to block any effort seeking to stop the process they used.
2) The people in control of the presidency, are doing this, and other things, to ensure the continuation of what they call "rule of law" and "our democracy":
3) This is literally what "their democracy" looks like.
[For those unaware, this was what was once called "the people's house" in popular representative parlance.]
2) A play-by-play perspective of a Democratic Convention showdown....
3) Clyburn heads to the White House for a meeting with Biden. He lays it all out – Biden needs to step down! Feeling the pressure, Biden announces he’s not running for re-election, leaving his supporters stunned and betrayed.
1. After Eric Holder left the Obama administration as Attorney General, he was hired by the State of California to defend against the Trump administration in early January 2017.
2. When Eric Holder left the Obama administration, his firm was contracted by California during a process of linking the motor vehicle registration files to the Secretary of State voter registration system.
Holder was advising on part of a technology system being constructed to bridge the DMV and SoS offices. You might know this as a “Motor/Voter” process. However, former AG Eric Holder had a very specific function in the construction of this technology bridge.
3. The process of adding voters to the registration rolls when they receive or update their driver’s license was seen as an opportunity to expand the voter rolls. Making the voter rolls as big as possible is the key to the utilization of mass mail-out balloting.
1) Let me bring FU type clarity to the "reasonable reforms" argument.
I have talked to everyone in DC about this. They are idiots. Not making mistakes, just plain allowing the IC to tell them nonsense. So, let me be clear.
2) Office of Inspector General Michael Horowitz testified April 27, 2023, more than 3.4 million search queries into the NSA database took place between Dec. 1st, 2020 and Nov. 30th, 2021, by government officials and/or contractors working on behalf of the federal government.
3) These search queries were based on authorizations related to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) and 702 search authorization.
1) There are two general flaws in this type of analysis.
While likely accurate that ISIS did not originate the planning of the attack. Two elements stand out that appear to point away from Galloway's supposition.
2) First, the suspects are alive. Meaning, there was no mop up operation behind them to remove the fingerprints of operational control.
Example (mop up): They didn't jump in the car after the attack and have the car explode with them in it. Essentially eliminating the trail.
3) The absence of the clean-up (could have been anything - not just my example) implies the people who organized the attackers wanted the attackers to be captured.... and therefore, talk about their prior instructions.