The @ethereum merge is one of the most anticipated events in #crypto
It’s expected to increase security, reduce latency and improve energy efficiency
Many are concerned that it will cause adverse price action for Ether
This thread examines the bull case🧵👇
Disclaimer: I own Ether.
Ethereum launched on July 30th, 2015 using a Proof of Work (“PoW”) mechanism
This is the same method that Bitcoin uses to validate transactions
However, there are environmental concerns around the energy costs used by the miners
Ethereum plans to transition to PoS by Sept 19th, 2022
The chains are currently being run in parallel while the Beacon chain is tested
The following diagram (source: Ethereum.org) illustrates the recent transition well:
BEAR CASE:
There is approximately 12.7m Ether ($19.8b USD) locked up in the ETH2.0 staking contract (according to Dune Analytics)
This equates to 10.4% of the circulating supply...
Investors are concerned that those staking their Ether will dump on the market upon unlock
ETH2.0 staking commenced in Nov 2020 when the price of Ether was $415
The current market price for Ether is $1,555 so some will take profits of a 3-4x...
BULL CASE:
1/Long Term Ether Bulls:
Those that locked their Ether up in the ETH2.0 staking contract for a 2 year period are bullish Ether long term
It is counterintuitive for a huge selloff to occur. Particularly during a macro bear market, 70% down from ATH
2/Means Tested:
80% is staked by those with more than 32 Ether (This equates to $13,280 in Nov 2020) - not your average retail investor
Most retail got into crypto in early 2021, with the blow off top hitting that Nov
3/ Queuing System:
Ether staked (ETH2.0) cannot be un-staked at once
In fact according to @korpi87 we can see that this could take as long as a year based on calculations of the maximum number of unlocks per epoch (6.4 minutes each):
4/ Fundamental Supply and Demand Shift:
There will likely be a reduction in daily Ether emissions once ETH2.0 is live
Compounding this with the deflationary mechanism from the EIP-1559 upgrade (which went live in Aug 2021) means that we could see further reductions in supply
5/ Mining Economics:
Let's look at the behaviour of the miners -
Under PoW mechanisms, miners tend to sell a portion of the yield to cover the issuance costs (electricity)
But if miners do not incur these expenses under PoS, then this could flip to net buy pressure...
We are beginning to see the impacts of Ether mining operations being wound down, with miners incurring losses over the past few months
The driver being reduced Ether prices, reduced network usage and the imminent “difficulty bomb” to be implemented prior to the merge
6/ Perspective Shift - Tech Company?
Ether is perceived by many investors as a speculative asset, with the capital appreciation being the main investment driver
But there are cashflows when Ether is staked in return for securing the Ethereum network, so lets use a techco lens...
With this in mind, why wouldn’t an investor that purchases stock in @Apple, @Google or @Microsoft, not consider Ether?
After all, the price to earnings (P/E) ratio would be a much more appetizing investment than your traditional tech stock
Ether P/E calculations:
The yield for staked Ether could go as high as 12%, an increase from circa 5% on Ethereum
With profit margins estimated to be already around 90% for PoW miners, this could increase to 99% with the new PoS model given the reduction in issuance costs...
If we compare this to the global average PE ratio for software companies, then Ether is severely undervalued based on those forecast returns
Interlude - Enjoying the content so far? My previous write-ups can be found here:
7/ Sustainability Improvements:
The post merge shift to PoS will have a positive impact on the environment given the reduction in energy required to run the network
In fact ETH2.0 is estimated to be 2,000x more energy efficient according to Digiconomist:
POST MERGE PROSPECTS:
1/Sharding:
This is the process of splitting a database horizontally to spread the load and will work in harmony with Layer 2 solutions, like @0xPolygon
The intention is to reduce congestion
2/ Layer 2 Solutions: @VitalikButerin stated that the base layer of Ethereum wouldn’t be a quick upgrade
Sharding would only come in the last major phase of ETH2.0
As such Layer 2 solutions, like @0xPolygon or @arbitrum will be used in the meantime - probably harmoniously
3/ Strong Developer Community:
Ethereum continues to maintain the strongest developer community
According to Electric Capital, Ethereum has 25% of the Web3.0 developer community
RISKS:
However, there are risks to consider: 1/ Execution risk is the biggest concern when it comes to the merge
There has already been several delays
While the merge is scheduled for September 2022, there could be unforeseen events that cause a further setback
2/ Expectations Gap:
There may also be an expectation gap between users and developers
Users may anticipate drastic reductions in transaction fees and speed
However the scalability element (on layer 1) is not expected until sharding
3/ Counterproductive Slashing Impacts:
Validators who are staking their Ether could be subject to slashing penalties
This is intended to incentivize behaviour that is beneficial to the network
But there could be unforeseen impacts with stakers penalized unfairly
4/ Competing Chains:
Other chains may be better fits for different use cases or applications may become chain agnostic
Interoperability is becoming increasingly viable with @Polkadot
INDUSTRY BACKGROUND:
According to @Savills last valuation, the global real estate property valuation was around $326.5T in 2020
The real estate market can be broken up into three segments:
Focusing on the largest segment (residential) - according to @CoreLogicInc there were 7 million residential units sold in 2021, totalling $2.8T of transaction volume
What's @benbeath's @BattleFlyGame (BF) & why was it trending as #3 on twitter a few days ago?!
It’s the next generation in P2E gaming that ensures an equitable starting point for all participants. #innovative
Disclosure: I have one @EtherOrcs BF WL and intend to mint.
🧵
1/ BF is a P2E defi game being launched on the @TreasureDAO $MAGIC ecosystem.
After the success of Bridgeworld and @SmolBrainsNFT more projects are launching on Arbitrum and building out the @Treasure_DAO founders’ vision of creating a decentralised Nintendo for the Metaverse.
2/ @Treasure_DAO is the console.
BF is one of many cartridges.
$MAGIC is the lifeblood that pulls it all together.
Many will recall the NES, SNES & N64. The initial multiplayer, then expansion online and now this takes it to the next iteration in the technology evolution.
@skuxxverse (SV) is effectively an @nftworldsNFT (NFTW) fund. The price should correlate perfectly to the $WRLD emissions from airdrops and rewards.
Is SV undervalued? IMO the 0.65 Eth floor is worth the potential $50.4k USD estimated projection per table 6.
Let’s dive in. 🧵
1/ Disclosure: I own 2 SV passes.
How does SV work?
SV acquires NFTW Land with the intention of distributing the $WRLD tokens back to SV pass holders. So we can fair value the pass as the present value of future $WRLD cash flows.
2/ The token distribution can be established from staking, rental, P2E gaming rewards and airdrop claims.
At 22/2/22 SV owns 27 NFTW land parcels and intends to accumulate future land using royalties from secondary sales. See holdings: 0xF78F59412c9F9cB57227a925018565A3f0CBBc9d
LPs are important for the long term success and stability of a project.
We will assume the utility for the token is related to gaming, as is the case for many NFT projects.
A thread:
1/ What is a LP:
LPs are a collection of crypto assets locked within a smart contract. This is made possible through Automatic Market Makers (AMM). An AMM enables peer to peer trading directly through a smart contract.
2/ In traditional finance this liquidity is provided by a centralised authority such an exchange (through the traditional order book model) or a bank. They typically earn a transaction fee % which is similar to the % fees earned on volume traded by liquidity providers.