When ShiDga became mlechCharAT a band of ideologues penetrated the mlechCha deep state apparatus. They started off aligned with the gardabhins & were aligned with tech & deeply committed to projects related to the marusthala & destruction of the Rus. It seems they let ShiDga keep
keep busy with his maithuna even as they tested out their agenda in bhagadattapura, against the Serbs & with Yeltsin. We all know who was the man who put a stop to the last of these projects. Then after ShiDga went they set a system such that some of their kind could now work
with guchChaka with vakrAs as their frontend. In this round, they focused on their pet agenda in the kingdom centered on bhagadattapura. When ardhakR^iShNa ascended the throne they curbed his tendencies & brought him to ground while skewering al Qaddafy in the process. During
this period they started converting to a new religion navyonmAda, driven by their backers in virtual tech& academia. This was the force that overthrew the nAri~NgapuruSha & placed piNDaka on the cushion. It seems pichChilla did not get that entirely or at least did not realize
the entirety of their penetration and spread out tentacles. Only now pichChilla has realized this and has openly declared that he will uproot them. But he is no chANakya& does not have the kUTaniti on his pakSha to perform such an unmUlana of the navyonmatta-s. The soraShaNDAdi
who are at the core of that system propping up the gardabhin-s have now learnt of his intention. They already overthrew him once; hence, we believe that they will do everything within their means to prevent him from nearing the throne again& would likely succeed. What does this
mean for the H? Apart from the fact that the navyonmatta-s are svabhAvavairins of the H, the tactics they develop among the mahAmlechCha-s will be effectively exported to bhArata. They have already put in their tentacles like shashiyAbhaka, the former vice president, a former CJI
& many others. Moreover, lATesha & some of his court have themselves internalized some of the ideas of navyonmAda. Thus, they might not spot the disease easily or soon enough. Whereas the soraShaNDAdi can make open announcements of overthrowing this govt or that, we suspect that
such an opportunity is not available for those seeking to counter their evil -- do they even control a single platform like vi or chitranAla that are firmly in the hands of the duShTa-s? Hence, the way of viShNusharman as taught in the kakolUkIya book is the only way out
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I'm twting his with some reluctance not because I doubt any of the stuff uncovered here but because it engages in unnecessary vanity boosterism of certain individuals involved. It seems there is some money involved here & money to be made by some which has science.org/content/articl…
given it the high profile airing it is getting. The primary reason for twting this out is that biomedical research & more broadly branches of molecular biology/biochemistry allied with it are rife with such cases. Indeed there clear examples where the same tabloids like Science&
Nature & other sensationalist venues of the Cell family have done absolutely nothing to correct a lot of the fake science they have published. The impact of recent pandemic on biomedical research/production, the rise of ML-based methods & the money flowing into certain research
Between 1870-80 CE a V1 from the marahaTTa country named Mahadev Kunte was among the 1st group of Indians to appreciate the historical significance of the IE theory. From today's vantage a self-aware H (leaving aside the willful celebrators of counter-factual delusions) would
see him with v.mixed feelings. On 1 hand he had internalized the humiliating rout of the marahaTTa host in the 1st war of independence; thus, in some ways, like the va~NgIya Vankimchandra, he felt that the intercourse with the ascendant Occident will revive in India a glorious IE
civilization. He wrote this cringe-worthy eulogy to please his English overlords, particularly JB Peile whom he saw as a benevolent patron of the H. Hence, it would not be a great surprise if many of his coethnics, some of whose recent ancestors had perished in the attempt to
1 of the consequences of our closeness to the Rus in the days of my youth was that a good part of our education was from Rus works (translated to Eng). There we learnt of 1 of the greatest intellectuals the gigantic Lomonosov. He seems to be largely ignored in the occident& even
sometimes claimed to be a product of Rus boosterism. While I'm no scholar of the topic to formally rebut that claim but we find it shaky as we have his exchanges with Euler that are a clear testimony of his remarkable achievements. The Rus imported a lot of Germans & high IQ Jews
to build their intellectual tradition but Lomonosov was a local man of v.humble roots -- a literal matsyendra in their midst. In terms of his cerebral achievements in relatively short life of 53 years he would have matched the ideal expressed in our tradition of true vidvAn.
A table of frequency of certain keywords across 6 shaiva-tantra-s. For each text the 1st column is absolute count; 2nd is rank (ties randomly broken); 3rd is frequency relative to the most frequent word. This provides insights into the post-vaidika evolution of the tradition
The 1st text is uDDAmareshvara, TMK, the best preserved of the extant DAmara tantra-s. It shows a clear dominance of rudra, an absence of sadAshiva & the other names being roughly equally distributed. This is closer to the vaidika name space& it shows mantra-s of an archaic form
that are reminiscent & in some cases directly related the those from the uchChuShma-rudra-kalpa of the atharvan tradition. Thus, it may be inferred to be from an early stratum of the shaiva tradition. The 2nd text is the svachChanda tantra, a dakShiNa-shaiva text. It is marked
@huntersrolinson In late antiquity many IE groups (India, Iran, Armenia, Germania, Rome to degree) converged to a triad (trimUrti) of "primary" deities. The Armenian one is given as Aramazd, Anahit, and Vahagn. It is not identical to the Iranic one despite the Iranic origin of the names. It seems
@huntersrolinson the Iranic names were superimposed onto the original Armenian ones. Thus, it may indeed be correct to assume that behind vahagn was the original Armenia indra-class deity. It also seems Armenians had a more typical, veda-like aindra religion distinct in its configuration from the
@huntersrolinson religion of core Zoroastrian one. This might have favored the easy establishment of the Indian dynasty in Armenia for a while (followed by Gregory's classically Abrahamistic crusade on H shrines in the region). However, on the other hand it might also suggest that in the more
The opening of the vrAtya-kANDa of the atharvaveda has elements that have continued to find expression through the history of the shaiva tradition. Here the prAjapatya& aindra flavors of the religion are incorporated within the early shaiva framework of the vrata. The primal
vrAtya is to be understood as rudra himself &when he manifests specifically as nIlalohita-rudra who in the paurANika tradition beheads the 5th head of prajApati. But again note the verb sam-Ir, which is used to indicate the primal vrAtya (rudra) animating prajApati. The same root
is behind a name of vAyu; also note its use in the taittirIya-shruti to describe a comparable activity of vAyu: वायुर् नक्षत्रम् अभ्येति निष्ट्याम् । तिग्मशृङ्गो वृषभो रोरुवाणः । *समीरयन् भुवना मातरिश्वा* । अप द्वेषाँसि नुदताम् अरातीः ॥
This again points to that old connection