When I was younger I recall being intrigued by what R.A. Heinlein I read (far from all of it, he wrote a lot) but these days I feel like I primarily experience Heinlein's work in the form of pithy quotes which do not for a moment survive my historian's brain.
'Specialization is for insects' - is just a wild take both historically and also for a naval officer...but then Heinlein only had to operate, not design, those systems.

I guess the design work was done by insects.
'Wisdom is not additive; its maximum is that of the wisest man in a given group' - fairly conclusively disproved - market actors collectively routinely outperform the 'wisest men' in the market. Markets may not be perfectly efficient, but they are smarter than you.
'In the past popularly elected governments have been no better and sometimes far worse than overt tyrannies.' - For all the flaws of democracies, they tend not to be found among the worst genocides or human rights violations (not perfect, but the bar for tyrannies is low here).
And on the previous tweet before folks rush in to list all of the nasty stuff democracies have done - yes, yes, I know. I am aware.

And yet the autocracies still manage to be consistently worse, often by literal orders of magnitude. The point is comparative.
Of course Heinlein is a foundational author for science fiction, don't get me wrong - I'm not dismissing his impact.

Just maybe not the place to go for one's moral philosophy or sociological reasoning.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Bret Devereaux

Bret Devereaux Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @BretDevereaux

Jul 25
Following on @GoingMedieval - of course the film is just titled 'MEDIEVAL' and of course it is this sort of movie because this is the only sort of medieval movie we are allowed to have.

Just endless dudes in colorless, desaturated places bashing each other's faces in.
It can't be a quiet drama about the hardships of a small French village trying to survive through the difficulties of life at the edge of subsistence, sustained by their sincere faith, the relationships between families and the pockets of joy in rural life.
'Medieval' can't be a story about a monastic community, telling how the lives of each brother (or sister) brought them there - novices since boyhood or perhaps nobles despairing of reaching heaven in a violent occupation or men who sought a chance at learning?
Read 8 tweets
Jul 21
So to be clear this is still plagiarism and I cannot think of any use this software would offer except for doing *more* plagiarism in an effort to hide the plagiarism you are doing.

Paraphrasing (& citing), after all, isn't that tricky and you could also, you know, quote & cite.
Likewise, using an AI complete tool would also be severe academic misconduct. The point is for *you* to have *thoughts* and to learn to *express* those thoughts well!

If you can be replaced by an AI...you will soon be replaced by an AI.

And absolutely if I knew a student was using either I would refer them through whatever system the university had for academic honesty issues.

As I warn my students, I have busted students for plagiarism at every university I've taught. I don't like it, but I will do it.
Read 4 tweets
Jul 20
I'm not the first to note it but this Inside Higher Ed article is an exercise in, I think, missing the point.

It starts with the observation that it is hard to get scholars to do some of the key unpaid work of the academy (mostly reviewers)... 1/

insidehighered.com/blogs/higher-e…
...and concludes that the problem is the decline of institutions.

But of course other institutional priorities continue to get met. I don't see empty chairs on prestigious committees in major professional associations, or a lack of papers for their annual meetings. 2/
And indeed, *published* book reviews don't seem in these desperate straits either.

What connects the things that seem hard to get with the things that do not seem hard to get?

Academics under increasing job market pressure only do the things which help them get jobs. 3/
Read 7 tweets
Jul 19
So I've got to ask - what Latin textbook is teaching 'maritus' as the masculine pair of 'uxor'? I've gotten several replies to my statement that Latin has no word for 'husband' to match 'uxor' with 'yes it does, it's 'maritus'!' and...no, not quite?
'Maritus, -a, -um' is an adjective that can take any gender. It means 'married thing/person.' It isn't a word for husband the way uxor is a word for wife because it can just as easily be 'marita' or even mariti ('married [couple]').
Uxor is also more more frequent despite only referring to wives, while maritus can refer to husbands, wives, couples, paired animals, and trees grafted on each other. Just going by the Dickinson core Vocab (because I'm lazy) 'uxor's frequency rank is 552, while 'maritus' is 654.
Read 11 tweets
Jul 18
So I was thinking about Roman age/gender terminology (boy vs. man, etc) and it occurs to me that today's supposed 'extended adolescence' is really just the reemergence of something I think about as 'graduated adulthood.'

So let's take a trip through Roman age/gender words! 1/
So systems of 'graduated adulthood' are really common in traditional societies: adulthood often comes early but *full* adulthood and the social status (and sometimes legal status) it brings is delayed either for age or family milestones.

Let's use the Romans as an example. 2/
First I've got to note that unlike English which has symmetrical age words for male and female (boy to girl, man to woman), Latin has two quite different systems, where the words for males are mostly based on age and for women mostly on marital and family status. 3/
Read 25 tweets
Jul 16
This is supposed to be some sort of trollish pro-Russian own, but it could just be captioned, "Russia is bad at diplomacy and the United States, for all its blundering, is actually fairly good at it."

Kind of a self-own, really.

Also, I think some flags are missing here...
I don't see Finland, Japan, South Korea, Colombia, Albania, Israel, Romania, Sweden or the furtive New Zealand, so easily forgotten (here's hoping the Kiwis all played Dark Souls and get the joke).

Come on, put the whole many-headed hydra up there!
Or is it just that once you actually list all of the countries it just makes it pretty obvious that it's the vast majority of free, liberal democracies and so maybe, just maaaaaybe it's all of the Russian territorial aggression and war crimes?
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(