SOS Scotland Profile picture
Jul 26 10 tweets 5 min read
A few years ago a drag performer was brought into a primary school in Scotland. Parents were not consulted and it resulted in an apology being issued by Renfrewshire Council, who had not appropriately risk assessed the drag Queen. bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotla…
Lgbt Youth Scotland tweeted this message at the time, despite the sexualised content found on the drag queens social media, mixed with images of the children and the school.

It would seem scrutiny or questions about #Safeguarding are not appropriate for certain things.
Politician Mhairi Black attacked parents as homophobic in response to them asking questions, wholly understandable when we consider that there was indeed a #Safeguarding risk eventually identified.
We have witnessed similar over recent days from another Scottish politician, Patrick Harvie, accusing anyone raising concerns about #Safeguarding as ‘anti lgbt’ because they happen to be directed at Stonewall.
It would appear that there are indeed special allowances being granted to specific organisations and people if they belong to what is increasingly looking like a sacred caste, untouchable and beyond accountability.
We recommend this tweet by @SafeSchools_UK which covers concerns south of the border.
And this one from @Transgendertrd and whilst Stonewall are not in Scottish schools, LGBT Youth Scotland are, and as we highlighted, they’re approach to this issue is very similar.
We are increasingly concerned that if something has an LGBTQIA+ label attached to it, people raising concerns are dismissed as homophobic, transphobic or anti all of the above. Even when those concerns have genuine validity.

We’ve written to @CYPCS and will do so again.
We also call on @scotgov and ask them when they plan to step in and say something about this obvious lack of critical thinking from their politicians and funded organisations.
@threadreaderapp unroll please

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with SOS Scotland

SOS Scotland Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @sos_scotland

Jul 13
We asked Dr Cass if she thinks that teachers should be trained around being able to avoid overshadowing of underlying causation of distress in a child presenting as transgender.

Dr Cass: ‘100% agree that teachers should be given more training on how to manage children…1/
with gender distress. Gender distress doesn’t begin at the door of the NHS. Guidance should be provided to school staff on what they can do”

“A child in a supportive family, under any context, is going to have a better outcome than a child who isn’t…2/
One real problem is when schools enact a social transition without any communication with the family, which instantly puts a poorer outcome on that child.”

She continued - “Social transition is a powerful intervention. Whether it’s the right outcome for any one child is a…3/
Read 8 tweets
Jul 12
Parents need to be involved in decisions about how their disabled children are looked after in school. This is essential for #Safeguarding

This @NSPCC podcast covers a study they funded looking at how to provide better support for parents and to get their views . 1/
Where intimate care is required, the child and/or their parents views must be considered as paramount. 2 practitioners will usually be involved, however best practice is to use a same-sex practitioner for reasons of privacy, dignity and safety of the child. 3/
Read 6 tweets
Jun 22
We carried out FOI’s to all local authorities to ask about training being carried out in schools by outside organisations. We are beginning to get them back now and working through them.

Already we are seeing a pattern developing that is concerning.
One LA confirmed that 4 schools in their area had signed up to receive training & resources from LGBT YS, with one school paying £450 to ‘have their work validated’.

We asked for copies of the resources/training and were sent what was used for a Pronoun Day lesson…
Within this resource, teachers are encouraged to consider whether they should use different pronouns in front of family. There’s a paragraph in bold which gives the warning “Revealing somebody’s pronouns without their consent can put that person at risk in certain circumstances”
Read 9 tweets
Jun 22
When we wrote to the @SP_EHRCJ an area we highlighted that has received no coverage so far in evidence was the impact on schools. We specifically mentioned what this could mean for New Scots young people with religious beliefs that require single sex spaces.1/
We have concerns that lowering the age of eligibility for a GRC to 16, therefore enabling school aged young people to legally change their sex, will have unintended consequences not only on the protected characteristic of sex, but on religion, belief & disability too. 2/
“That is because it would disadvantage children from religions that mandate sex separation in intimate spaces, such as Orthodox Judaism and some strands of Islam, or indeed those with “gender-critical” beliefs (the belief that sex is binary, immutable and important).” 3/
Read 4 tweets
Jun 20
We are looking into materials being developed for an Inclusive, Diverse & Decolonised Curriculum, in Edinburgh.

An example:

Lesbian - women who are sexually attracted to only other women. People may assume that this applies to only AFAB women. However, TW, can also be lesbian
What message does this send to girls coming to terms with being same sex attracted? How will these definitions be adopted into the curriculum?

Lesbians are exclusively same sex attracted & shouldn’t be shamed into thinking males can be lesbian on fear of ostracism & exclusion
Another;

Misgendering - … This can also be considered a micro aggression, a passive aggressive act on the part of the person doing the misgendering.

Children & teachers should not be compelled to speak in a way that doesn’t align with their own beliefs. This isn’t aggression.
Read 4 tweets
Apr 28
If you are a teacher and a child tells you that they are questioning their gender, it would be the exception not the rule to decide not to share this information with parents.

If you suspect a child will be at risk if you share with parents, you have a duty to consider why 1/
You should be asking yourself:

* what are my reasons for deciding not to share this information?

* what harm could result if I DO NOT share?

* what are the implications for the child, for you, for your school if you don’t share?

2/
Confidentiality is NOT an absolute right. If a child makes a disclosure to you, about their gender, abuse, bullying, family concerns or ANYTHING that could adversely impact them, you should be reminding them that you can’t promise to keep this secret.

3/
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(