This is a stub for a future note on Iranic lunar deities. The marUnmatta al-shahrastAnI, an adherent of the founder of the Assassins, Hasan bin sabbAh ironically recorded a fragment of a lost Iranic puruSha-sUkta-like origin mythology, where ahura mazdhA speaks in 1st person
ahura mazdA: "I created the whole of this world from myself. I created the souls of the righteous from the hair of my head; the sky from my brain; nails and arms ...(?) from my forehead; the sun from my eye; the moon from my nose; the stars from my tongue; sraosha &the rest of
the yazata-s from my ear; the earth from the sinew of my foot." ~based on Shaked. The moon deity here is mAh which appears to be spelt as MAO in the kuShANa coin and is usually depicted with the moon, a club & a sword. There is another deity seen on kuShAna coins & rare Roman
artefacts names as manao-baga. The root is related to manas -- which has an old IE relationship the word for moon. Unlike in the above Iranic puruSha-like origin myth the H tradition links to their counterpart: chandra-mA manaso jAtaH | But the kuShANa iconography of manao-baga
indicates the link with the moon rather clear by depicting it in the same way as with the deity named MAO. However, the iconography of manao-baga is distinct (here on kanishka's coin): he is seated on a throne with a trident helmet& is comparable to the H viShNu holding a chakra&
halAyudha & is four-armed in contrast to the 2-armed mAh. What are the antecedents of manao-baga. In the Zoroastrian stream of the Iranic tradition, we encounter the deity vohu manaH, who has the god mAh as one of his assistants. However, there is no evidence that the eastern
Iranics terms vohu manah as manao-baga. There is evidence from place names (vohumandAt) that some Iranics in the kuShANa-shaka realm from Chorasmia worshipped vohu manah as just that. Hence, manao-baga may be seen as distinct lunar deity of the Eastern Iranics who saw him as
comparable as viShNu. However, this sealing of huviShka shows him with a spear in addition to the chakra and hala.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I'm twting his with some reluctance not because I doubt any of the stuff uncovered here but because it engages in unnecessary vanity boosterism of certain individuals involved. It seems there is some money involved here & money to be made by some which has science.org/content/articl…
given it the high profile airing it is getting. The primary reason for twting this out is that biomedical research & more broadly branches of molecular biology/biochemistry allied with it are rife with such cases. Indeed there clear examples where the same tabloids like Science&
Nature & other sensationalist venues of the Cell family have done absolutely nothing to correct a lot of the fake science they have published. The impact of recent pandemic on biomedical research/production, the rise of ML-based methods & the money flowing into certain research
When ShiDga became mlechCharAT a band of ideologues penetrated the mlechCha deep state apparatus. They started off aligned with the gardabhins & were aligned with tech & deeply committed to projects related to the marusthala & destruction of the Rus. It seems they let ShiDga keep
keep busy with his maithuna even as they tested out their agenda in bhagadattapura, against the Serbs & with Yeltsin. We all know who was the man who put a stop to the last of these projects. Then after ShiDga went they set a system such that some of their kind could now work
with guchChaka with vakrAs as their frontend. In this round, they focused on their pet agenda in the kingdom centered on bhagadattapura. When ardhakR^iShNa ascended the throne they curbed his tendencies & brought him to ground while skewering al Qaddafy in the process. During
Between 1870-80 CE a V1 from the marahaTTa country named Mahadev Kunte was among the 1st group of Indians to appreciate the historical significance of the IE theory. From today's vantage a self-aware H (leaving aside the willful celebrators of counter-factual delusions) would
see him with v.mixed feelings. On 1 hand he had internalized the humiliating rout of the marahaTTa host in the 1st war of independence; thus, in some ways, like the va~NgIya Vankimchandra, he felt that the intercourse with the ascendant Occident will revive in India a glorious IE
civilization. He wrote this cringe-worthy eulogy to please his English overlords, particularly JB Peile whom he saw as a benevolent patron of the H. Hence, it would not be a great surprise if many of his coethnics, some of whose recent ancestors had perished in the attempt to
1 of the consequences of our closeness to the Rus in the days of my youth was that a good part of our education was from Rus works (translated to Eng). There we learnt of 1 of the greatest intellectuals the gigantic Lomonosov. He seems to be largely ignored in the occident& even
sometimes claimed to be a product of Rus boosterism. While I'm no scholar of the topic to formally rebut that claim but we find it shaky as we have his exchanges with Euler that are a clear testimony of his remarkable achievements. The Rus imported a lot of Germans & high IQ Jews
to build their intellectual tradition but Lomonosov was a local man of v.humble roots -- a literal matsyendra in their midst. In terms of his cerebral achievements in relatively short life of 53 years he would have matched the ideal expressed in our tradition of true vidvAn.
A table of frequency of certain keywords across 6 shaiva-tantra-s. For each text the 1st column is absolute count; 2nd is rank (ties randomly broken); 3rd is frequency relative to the most frequent word. This provides insights into the post-vaidika evolution of the tradition
The 1st text is uDDAmareshvara, TMK, the best preserved of the extant DAmara tantra-s. It shows a clear dominance of rudra, an absence of sadAshiva & the other names being roughly equally distributed. This is closer to the vaidika name space& it shows mantra-s of an archaic form
that are reminiscent & in some cases directly related the those from the uchChuShma-rudra-kalpa of the atharvan tradition. Thus, it may be inferred to be from an early stratum of the shaiva tradition. The 2nd text is the svachChanda tantra, a dakShiNa-shaiva text. It is marked
@huntersrolinson In late antiquity many IE groups (India, Iran, Armenia, Germania, Rome to degree) converged to a triad (trimUrti) of "primary" deities. The Armenian one is given as Aramazd, Anahit, and Vahagn. It is not identical to the Iranic one despite the Iranic origin of the names. It seems
@huntersrolinson the Iranic names were superimposed onto the original Armenian ones. Thus, it may indeed be correct to assume that behind vahagn was the original Armenia indra-class deity. It also seems Armenians had a more typical, veda-like aindra religion distinct in its configuration from the
@huntersrolinson religion of core Zoroastrian one. This might have favored the easy establishment of the Indian dynasty in Armenia for a while (followed by Gregory's classically Abrahamistic crusade on H shrines in the region). However, on the other hand it might also suggest that in the more