The #MI250 is misleadingly marketed as "one chiplet GPU" with 13312C, 90TFLOPs & 128GB @ 3.2TB/s.
But it is not. The 2 GCDs are 2 separate GPUs with 64GB each, like a K80 dual-GPU but in a socket. One #GPU can't directly access the other's memory.
š§µ2/6
To use both GCDs, the software needs to be multi-GPU capable. For many algorithms this is very difficult and for some it is entirely infeasible. The desire for large unified memory is huge.
The #MI250 promises exactly that with "128GB", but delivers only half.
š§µ3/6
Although faster on paper, a single #MI200 GCD is much inferior to the #A100 40GB for bandwidth-bound applications (e.g. lattice Boltzmann / #CFD), because it's efficiency is about as low as old Nvidia Kepler. It is only moderate performance increase over #MI100/#RadeonVII.
š§µ4/6
More memory (32GB on #MI100 -> 64GB on #MI200) is a very good step in the right direction though. Also the node itself is solid, essentially 8 fast #GPUās in 4 sockets with fast interconnect.
I'm looking forward to do some large-scale simulations in the coming weeks.
š§µ5/6
Now for the fun stuff: a first large-scale simulation on @AMDInstinct#MI250. Even with only 64GB accessible on a GCD, it's one beast of a #GPU! šš¤Æš„ļøš„
While the one GCD of #MI250 simulates the X-wing, the second GCD can be used for the dark side of the force and simulate TIE fighter aerodynamics. šš
Both of these large-scale simulations can run at the same time with single-socket @AMDInstinct hardware.
The @FluidX3D simulation was done at 10 billion voxel grid resolution (2152Ć4304Ć1076), over 217k time steps (1 second), at Re=3.75M (100km/h).
The fins on the front spoiler create a turbulent boundary layer and kick up it up onto the front wheels to reduce drag. š§µ2/5
The streamlined chassis guides airflow under the spoiler to create down force. The halo - one of the best additions to the sport in terms of safety - is rather aerodynamic.
Each frame of the video is 120GB, 144TB for 1201 frames. @FluidX3D renders the data directly in VRAM. š§µ3/5