1] The Siege of #Abuja has begun, we can draw interesting parallels with the 1969 siege of Owerri by Biafran forces in that you have a nominally weaker force, gradually encircling a much more powerful and well equipped one in order to destroy it but I would rather not.
2]Lets address the nature of this fight, I believe the enemy (or enemies) have broken the campaign down into several phases (1) Preparation of the Battlespace (2) Shaping the Battlespace (3) Isolating the Battlespace (4) The Attack (5) Exploitation.
3]I believe we are currently in Phase2/3.
Phase 1: The preparation of the battlespace has been going on for many years. There have been Boko Haram, ISWAP, Ansaru Darul Islam etc elements in the States surrounding Abuja for decades. They have been mostly benign,
4]in that they do not overtly confront the security forces or the state. But this presence has allowed them to build camps & structures, recruit, familiarise themselves with the terrain, depopulate areas , proselytise & reduce the presence of the state (little that it was).
5]As they became stronger, they began to deny the security forces mobility & access through ambushes, IEDs and attacks. The end state is that they are firmly encamped in Niger, Nasarawa, Kogi & Kaduna States & the hinterland of the FCT.
6]Phase 2: the enemy has sought to shape the battlespace strategically & operationally. Operationally this has taken the form of attacks on villages & security forces, putting them on the defensive & forcing them to devote combat power to force protection & defending major roads
7]Deliberate attacks, are usually road bound & thus easy to spot. All of this leaves the population & minor roads & villages free for the enemy to plan, hide, manoeuvre & operate. Strategically they have shaped the information battlespace with spectacular attacks
8]of which the #AbujaKaduna train & Kuje prison attacks are examples. The Abuja- Kaduna train attack stands out as the op that heralded the start of Phase 3. The enemy has past experience with the government & clearly knows they rarely negotiate seriously or in good faith,
9]thus their objectives might not be what they ask but to exploit the attack to underline the governments powerlessness, extract maximum ransom from the victims & tie up government resources trying to react or respond.
10]I am fairly sure they didn’t factor in this level of disinterest & ineptitude but their actions thus far do not indicate disarray. If they genuinely wanted to pressure the government they would have executed hostages by now. Instead they have held onto them for months.
11]It is instructive that the hostages are wealthy & middle class, many of whom have personal links to the ruling class, the psychological effect on the government & its supporters should not be discounted as a very potent outcome of this hostage taking.
12]Combined with attacks within Abuja & the FCT itself, it generates a fairly believable narrative of the enemies capability, impunity & presence. Fear & panic can be extremely useful allies for a weaker force.
13]Phase 3: has begun I believe but will increase with attacks on the roads to Abuja as well as attacks within Abuja. These attacks will again seek to suck in government combat power to protect the roads as well as set up checkpoints to try and defend the city.
14]again leaving the outskirts undefended. A spectacular attack on Abuja airport is highly likely in order to increase the feelings of isolation & impotence & operationally to damage/ neutralise NAF equipment.
15] Phase 4: These attacks will increase with IEDs, ambushes, marauding gunmen etc until Abuja ceases to function as people flee, businesses & schools close down. It’s unlikely there will be an attempt to capture Abuja.
16]Such an attack would be very costly for the enemy & pointless as they can essentially neutralise the city without it. Phase 5 is again not chronological, as the exploitation of their actions for money & publicity is ongoing & continuous.
17]I began with the siege of Owerri & I’ll briefly return to it. By the end of the siege after @NigAirForce tried air dropping supplies, their radios had died, 3Marine Commando Div in Port Harcourt assumed the troops trapped in Owerri (14 Bde led by Lt Col Etuk) had been lost
@NigAirForce 18]Etuk refused to surrender or be killed & organised his men for a withdrawal. The Biafrans promptly attacked & 14 Bde reacted so aggressively that the Biafrans resolved to simply allow them to leave the city rather than risk more men trying to defeat them.
@NigAirForce 19]Etuk withdrew with his surviving men, heavy weapons, casualties, stores & the body of his popular 2IC Major Hamman. The Biafrans attempted to ambush him on his way to Port Harcourt, but 14 Bde fought its way to the city & reported to an extremely surprised Benjamin Adekunle.
@NigAirForce 20]Owerri fell to Federal forces a few months later and the war soon ended.
The lesson of the Siege of Owerri is that even when surrounded, cut off & left for dead the fight is not over until you say it is

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Peccavi Consulting

Peccavi Consulting Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @PeccaviConsults

Jun 12
The only western power to have won a near peer conflict in the past 40 years is the UK. Defeating Argentina at range on land, in the air, on, under & over the sea, despite being out numbered in all those areas.
This was not due to superior tech or equipment. Argentina had modern ships, submarines, aircraft carriers, fast jet, ground attack aircraft, armour, artillery. & much more of them than the UK did, either on the island or a short hop away on the mainland.
They lost because the British military was qualitatively better. And the foundation of that qualitative superiority was doing the most basic things properly. So when things went wrong (ships/helicopters lost etc), Soldiers could simply pick up their bergans, walk, fight, dig in
Read 5 tweets
May 28
There appears to be a certain amount of denial & coping regards Ukraine’s current reverses on one hand & gloating on the other.
This is the problem when war is treated as just another form of family entertainment, with people waiting for plot twists or the hero to save the day
War consists of campaigns, operations, battles & skirmishes. One side can win every battle and lose the war (US: Vietnam), one side can consistently take horrific casualties & still prevail (Soviets: WW2). It is broadly immaterial unless viewed as a whole.
By 1942 the UK had lost the Battle of France, the Norwegian & Greek campaigns, was losing the first Battle of the Atlantic, lost Singapore, Burma, Hong Kong, the enemy was at the gates of Egypt in North Africa. The home land was under daily bombardment. We still won the war
Read 12 tweets
Mar 13
Putin’s popularity amongst Africans & support for the invasion of Ukraine seems to follow fairly predictable patterns (1)The reflexive ‘anti west’ attitude of many Africans has made this a fairly simplistic case of my ‘enemies enemy’ without any interrogation of the deeper issues
(2) The Russian narrative & propaganda supports the pre disposed biases of some Africans (NATO wants to invade Russia by setting up bases = the west wants to destabilise Africa by setting up bases) (3) The Soviet history of supporting liberation wars against imperial powers
(many of whom are now NATO countries) has been inherited by Russia (4) Putin’s strongman image resonates with the African perception of leadership, his no nonsense, militarized approach & rejection of western social liberalism particularly gay rights is an easy sell
Read 14 tweets
Jun 2, 2021
The threat in @MBuhari's tweet is even more tone deaf than expected but unfortunately should be taken seriously. Despite, decades of failure, the political & military leadership of Nigeria is convinced that force is the only response to any problem.
Having failed to defeat Boko Haram, stop ethnic violence, herdsmen/ farmer violence, address crime and insecurity or Niger Delta militancy, with an overstretched, understrength military, the Government has fascinatingly decided to voluntarily open another front.
IPOB, a fringe, quasi religious group, with e revisionist view of history has succeeded way beyond their dreams or abilities in hijacking an ideal, ably helped by the violence of the Nigerian state, in bringing war back to Igboland
Read 21 tweets
Apr 2, 2021
On the apparent @NigAirForce NAF475 Alphajet loss: 1) There is no evidence the aircraft was actually shot down
2) The editing with the photoshopped explosions leads one to assume that even if #BokoHaram managed to score a hit on the plane, it did not explode in the air because
3) The wreckage appears concentrated in one spot, making an mid air explosion unlikely as that would have dispersed wreckage over quite distant
4)The video shows a burning aircraft descending at speed almost vertically towards the ground
5) Yet one of the deceased pilots appears to be in an ejector seat with a partially deployed.
6) It would be useful for people to understand the difference between missiles, heavy machine guns, RPG & air defence artillery.
So What?
Read 8 tweets
Dec 2, 2020
1)This depressing statement says everything about the dearth of strategic thinking in Nigeria. When Nigeria hired PMCs in 2015 they came with well trained, well led, well equipped soldiers, air support & a logistics chain. This is what led to their successes.
2) So the question is why has Nigeria failed to develop a well trained, well equipped, supplied and led Army after 10 years of counter insurgency? South Africa’s Parabats were formed after SADF personnel attended a single course in the UK in 1961.
3)Portugal reformed its entire army in order to fight the colonial wars in Africa, Azerbaijan reformed its entire army to deliver victory in its recent war. Russia began reforms of its huge military after the terrible conflict in Chechnya.
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(