$UMAMI's $USDC vault finally launched yesterday & was at capacity in 30 MINUTES
I analyzed the impact to protocol revenues / $UMAMI stakers and the results were bullish to say the least π
(NFA)
π§΅π
1/
Some background, $UMAMI launched on Arbitrum as an $OHM fork (RIP)
Like many other rebasing tokenomic models, the price π
New leadership was brought into the project in early 2021 & they pivoted to a new delta neutral yield farming strategy for their treasury
2/
The team began laying the foundation for institutional caliber #realyield strategies
βοΈ Updated tokenomics / rebasing eliminated
βοΈ Audits / testing
βοΈ New UI
βοΈ Fiat on/off ramps
βοΈ Robust roadmap
3/
While the team was building, they deployed POL into delta neutral farming strategy that is similar to the $USDC vault
There are monthly treasury reports - results were impressive during turbulent times
June 22 - Treasury APY of 22% vs a 50% decline in $ETH
4/
Fast Fwd to today
βοΈ $USDC vault has launched for whitelist members only
βοΈ Vault demand is high, it will significantly scale over coming months
βοΈ Audit by zokyo complete
βοΈ Insurance to be added as an option for vault depositors shortly
π
5/
Earlier this month, $UMAMI completed legal incorporation as 2 separate entities: Umami Labs & Umami DAO
This is a critical step for institutions that are in ongoing discussions w/ $UMAMI regarding capital commitments
Total Protocol revenue of $5M but that is split 50/50 w/ stakers & treasury
Remember treasury earns yield too...
14/
Treasury is ~$4.5M today & per the assumptions β it will earn another $2.5M in revenues. Assuming ~$140k in monthly OpEx treasury profits are ~$5.3M
Remember this is farmed, if this earns a 20% APY, that is ~$1M in revenue for the protocol, of which 50% goes to stakers
15/
Total Revenue to stakers is now $3M
Lets be conservative and assume 100% of circ tokens are staked, that's $4.70 in Yield paid out to each staked Umami or an APY of 20%
But let's be honest, there will be a bunch of people buying a token w/ an effective 20% $ETH yield ...
16/
... especially once you factor in that the team is building much more
W/ yields like that, people will buy the token and it will rise in price until the market lands on a "normalized yield"
Let's say people buy until yield is ~8-12%
17/
Based on the #RealYield of $4.70 per token, price would need to rise to $47-59 for staked $UMAMI to yield 8-10% based on revenues in the vault and from yield on treasury
This only implied an FDV of $40-50M π
(remember this assumes 100% of circ $UMAMI staked, conservatv)
18/
This is in no way meant to be a price target analysis or my view on the token's intrinsic valuation. It's a simple analysis assuming run rate impacts, it's a basic framework
19/
The analysis also doesn't capture the big π§ stuff the $UMAMI team is building
I will leave that for another post but heres a peak - non forkable, highly composable metavaults w/ customizable yield strats bldg across the Arbi defi ecosystem ie (30% degen, 70% delta neut)
20/
It definitely isnt crazy seeing a path w/ TVL that is multiples higher than the $100M modeled above OR expecting $UMAMI to establish itself as the foundation for yield strategies for Arbitrum
21/
Disclaimer - I own $Umami. This is NFA, nor is this a "valuation analysis". It's one analysis w/ many assumptions that could prove to be untrue. DYOR
22/
@rage_trade delta Neutral $GLP vault that not only hedges the 50% $BTC / $ETH exposure from @GMX_IO $GLP token, but also hedges against traders positions on $GMX
π
Ever wonder why on chain perps volume is a fraction of CEX volume via FTX & Binance?
The answer is largely depth of liquidity
@rage_trade omnichain perps protocol aims to solve this via its novel "recycled liquidity" mechanism
π§΅π
Binance and FTX support billions of perps open interest volume every single day
A more capital efficient model is required for dApps to take mkt share from the big CEXs (which is likely why $GMX is investing in a synthetics / GD model)
$RAGE trade differs from on-chain perps in the following ways 1) matches orders via a UNI v3 vAMM 2) All platform liquidity comes from Rageβs natively supported LP Vaults 3) Rage creates deep liquidity by recycling other LP tokens
πlatest $AAVE proposal - DAO to acq 200k $veBAL to direct $BAL fees/emissions to aTOKEN pools
This comes on the heels of the $GHO stablecoin proposal. Some thoughts and math on why $AAVE needs to acq $CVX & pair w/ $Fraxbp to drive $GHO liquidity on @CurveFinance
π§΅π 1/
Alright normally not wat I talk about here but there is a lot of misinformation being tweeted about @elonmusk & twtr situation
If youre interested in facts, from the 75 pg agreement I skimmed, and from someone who spent their career working on deals just like ths one ππ§΅
public M&A agreemnts are a lot more strt fwd than private ones. They all have similar sections/construct but typically weigh buyer or seller friendly. This one , is one of the more seller friendly agreements I have ever seen, ie provides twtr a lot more flexibility than elon
The agreement was negotiated over 2 days @elonmusk wanted to sign / close quickly
He waived right to further diligence. And then the market nuked
Its like saying I bought a house, waived my right to an inspection then mkt tanked so I want out because of my inspection
@LiquityProtocol is a decentralized, governance free borrowing Protocol that allows you to borrow interest-free loans using your $ETH bagz as collateral
Loans are paid out in $LUSD and need to maintain a min collateral ratio of 110% to avoid liquidations
2/
0% interest rate? I second guessed that too.
The protocol charges 1x borrow & redemption fees that algorithmically adjust based on redemption demand (ie as # of redemptions increase, fee rate increases)
3/