Key questions: 1. What do you want to achieve? 2. What's stopping it from going as well as you'd like? 3. Which systems and structures need to improve? 4. How can this be achieved and sustained?
1a. Before making an improvement plan, we must develop our situational awareness.
Ask yourself & your team:
> Is it clear what we want to achieve in maths?
> Do the actions we take in our maths lessons support our aims?
> How do we know if it's going well?
1b. Almost every school I've worked with uses a maths action plan and monitoring cycle, but these don't always work together to highlight how well we are doing at achieving our main goal: better maths outcomes.
This is often because we do too many things.
1c. Somewhere along the way, we've picked up so many habits, routines, odd resources and worksheets, powerpoints and smart board files that it's hard to describe exactly how we're teaching maths.
This causes a problem. It can be unclear what's working well and what isn't.
1d. So try this. Spell out your intentions and state the actions you do to achieve them.
E.g.
In maths we aim to develop children's conceptual understanding, so we
> Use well-chosen models and images
> Examine examples and non-examples
> Apply our thinking to contextual problems
1e. Soon enough it should be clear which actions are aligned with your aims and which aren't.
When these things are clear, it's easier to discuss and evaluate what you do - where it happens and where it doesn't - and which things could be developed further for greater impact.
2a. When considering what's stopping us from achieving our goals, we have to acknowledge some of the likely contenders:
> Subject content and pedagogical knowledge
> Time and energy spent on superfluous actions
> Buy in and motivation
> Unclear direction
2b. Teaching maths and learning maths is complicated, there's no two ways about it.
As school leaders, one of our jobs is to try and remove barriers for colleges. This might involve helping them to develop their own knowledge, skills and confidence in teaching maths.
2c. As mentioned before, we also need to highlight the useful actions that support us in achieving our aims AND crucially reduce the actions, routines and resources we use that aren't very helpful.
Eliminating ineffective things we do creates more time and capacity. Double win!
2d. Capacity is so important in doing our job well - especially when looking to improve - because we need the time, energy and headspace to think hard about improvement.
If we increase know-how and confidence, and remove obstacles, we are more likely to have the capacity to act.
2e. Capacity, just like time and energy, is limited. So we must make our direction clear.
What can we do to make it obvious what want to achieve?
Over-communicate.
Make it clear why we are working on this, how we are going to act and what we will do to support each other.
3a. I think Yoda said, "there is no try, there is only do or do not."
So what are we going to do? Here's where we need a plan. A plan that focuses on developing our systems for teaching maths to reduce or eliminate our persistent problems and increase our likelihood of success.
3b. At this point it's probably easier to direct you to some top reading, such as:
- The EEF implementation guidance
- James Clear's book Atomic Habits
- Brene Brown's book Dare to Lead
They all talk about improving, by focussing on systems not isolated actions.
3c. For example, we can improve by developing better habits and forming productive routines.
Atomic Habits is about build good habits and stack them together. James Clear talks about making actions easy, desirable & rewarding. It also helps to have a cue to prompt us to act.
3d. Brene Brown's Dare to Lead also supports us with leading with vulnerability including recognising and addressing when things aren't working as well as they could.
I'd always recommend that we make dedicated time to check in with our teams about how it's going.
3e. So, when we have clear systems, with built in check points, it's easier to know if it's working.
E g., daily fluency tasks help children to revisit prior knowledge AND act as an assessment tool. This works v.well if the retrieval questions require contextual problem solving.
4a. So we've got a plan, everyone's got more know-how, more capacity and clarity (aiding buy-in) and we're delivering training to support our intended improvement actions.
It's now that we need to aim for sustainable improvement not just short-term uptake and fleeting success.
4b. In my experience improvement is more likely if:
▪︎ Training breaks professional learning into manageable chunks, enables deliberate practice, is followed shortly after by direct application, and includes peer support
▪︎ Success is observable and can be repeated often
4c. Recommended reading:
The points above about professional learning are well explained in the EEF's professional development guidance report.
The point about maintaining success over a longer period of time is also mentioned in the EEF's implementation guidance report.
4d. The thing I would stress is to avoid trying to implement too many changes at once.
This goes back to capacity, not only for teachers but for leaders supporting colleagues and monitoring how it is going.
And not everything is going to go to plan...
4e. Here I will give a shout out to @lwilliamsjones and the phrase 'responsive fidelity' that he uses when talking about not being inflexible.
5. So finally, when things are off the ground and going well, we want to keep this going and avoid things degrading - even when we've moved on to improvement actions for other subject areas.
The key here is persistence. If something took ages to get going, keep going back to it!
6. Plan to revisit key actions, link key actions together, praise and highlight things that are going well and don't move on too soon.
Check out @bennewmark's blog post about CPD principles and the LPA Standards.
And as @MaryMyatt might say, do fewer things but better!
I think I've reached the limit of how many tweets I can thread, so I will end by sharing an image of my slide of recommended reading from my mathsconf29 workshop.
This term, I've had several teachers and HTs say to me that they're doing away with mini whiteboards (MWBs) because it leads to less written work in their maths books.
I know I have very little influence but, I'm concerned.
1/n
In my work, advising primary teachers on improving pupils' learning in maths, I value some things higher than others.
Amongst the most important, for me, is the feedback the teacher receives from the pupils.
Mini whiteboards are one of the best ways to gather this.
2/n
MWBs can help teachers to get feedback from EVERY pupil much more quickly than a traditional 'hands up' or "cold-calling" Q&A might.
While those strategies do give us feedback, it's just harder to find out if EVERYONE understands if you don't use MWBs or something similar.
3/n
Mental starters, the activity you do as you begin the lesson, seem to have become a bit rarer* but they've def still got a place.
*possibly because they're not explicitly in a scheme or because they've been replaced by a retrieval quiz etc
1/n
Mental starters are great because they can
~ make time for counting and/or subitising
~ build confidence
~ involve everyone
~ recap prior learning
~ enable 'little and often' practice
And they can do all of this in less than 5 minutes!
2/n
Here's a few of my absolute favourite mental starters and why I like them.
"What's the question?"
Give the children a number and they give you questions where that's the answer.
✅ Low threshold
✅ No prep
✅ Endlessly resuable
✅ Works with all ages
3/n
🧵 A short thread for primary teachers about x tables in maths...
This afternoon I've been brushing up on my subject knowledge in preparation for a course I'm running about teaching multiplication and division bonds and I found myself considering several questions...
1/n
Q1. Should we call them multiplication FACTS or BONDS?
I'm trying to train myself into saying BONDS, not facts. Why?
Just as each number bond for 10 is connected, the same is true for the factors and products in the multiplication grid. There's so many connections. Bonds! 2/n
Q2. In the 2x table, for instance, is 2 the multiplier or the multiplicand and does it matter?
Although the product is the same either way I think it does matter, because it's the distinction between thinking "2 multiplied BY of A, B, C etc." or "A, B, C... multiplied by 2."
3/n
🧵Really feel like I need to talk to Differentiation following the episode of the TDAPE podcast with @Kieran_M_Ed@Suchmo83 and @Mr_AlmondED. If this was on TV, a voiceover might say, “If you’ve been affected by any of these issues and you need someone to talk to, call…” 🤣
1/n
Before I go any further, in case anyone needs to be told, this is a personal Twitter account and these are my views and do not necessarily reflect the views of my employer.
I’m sure everyone who works in education has different experiences and views, that’s natural.
2/n
I think Kieran, Chris and Neil are spot on in much this episode, and it really brings back memories of 4-way differentiation (in my own early practice) or worksheets for the sake of arbitrary policy.
IME these (and other lethal mutations) are still very common.
3/n