One macro effect of sanctions that is not often discussed: Russian Central Bank projects an astonishing $246 billion net outflow of capital in 2022 - despite capital controls!
1/
This could be explained by the mass exodus of foreign companies, but that's not it: Western companies and individuals are also subject to capital controls, they cannot move their money out of the country easily.
2/
The explanation apparently lies in the fact that exporters accumulate their profits on their foreign accounts and do not re-invest in Russia. This is registered as capital outflows.
3/
This is somewhat paradoxical: capital outflows usually lead to the weakening of the ruble, however, this year witnesses both record outflows and record strengthening of the ruble.
4/
It seems that the collapse of imports is so great that even the limited amount of currency that reaches Russia is bigger than the economy's capacity to import goods (hence the strong ruble).
5/
At the same time, vast amounts of currency do not reach Russia at all, remaining on exporters' foreign accounts (and perhaps being re-invested somewhere outside of Russia).
6/
In essence, the famed record trade surplus is directly translated into record net outflow of capital. Hence no real benefits to the Russian economy.
7/
Takeaways: 1) the ruble probably won't collapse even as oil/gas trade with Europe continues to decline, 2) nevertheless, Russia's economy is in an extremely unhealthy state, with neither trade surplus nor strong ruble indicating that "sanctions aren't working".
8/
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Confusion everywhere, people do not understand the stakes in the current moment.
Russia can either lose or win this war, and this is decided right now.
1/
Russia's main goal has never been to occupy and annex territories, but to subjugate Ukraine and crush its sovereignty. Ukraine has been fighting valiantly (and successfully) to prevent this outcome.
2/
Despite Trump's betrayal, European states can still save the situation. They need to:
1) Sign ironclad guarantees of massive military supplies to Ukraine for decades to come (and mobilize their military industries to achieve this)
4/
He also notably calls the Minsk agreements "the first partition of Ukraine". But... but... The Kremlin was earnest about Minsk, the agreements were about re-integrating the Donbas into Ukraine! And now this! I wonder what Aaron Maté and his bunch would say.
2/
Surkov was, quite officially, Putin's assistant in charge of Ukraine policy in 2013-2020. He now admits that the Minsk Agreements were akin to Russia's annexation of part of Ukraine's territory.
3/
I feel like most of the debates about the resolution of the war in Ukraine miss the point. It's not about the occupied territories, NATO or security guarantees. It's about the future of the Ukrainian army.
A 🧵.
1/
Most people agree at this point that the liberation of all the occupied territories is unrealistic.
2/
However, the NATO issue refuses to go away. Ukraine will not be admitted to NATO for the simple reason that Russia's renewed aggression against Ukraine would mean a war between Russia and NATO.
3/
Fascinating how Putinist the so-called "Project 2025" is both in terms of ends and means.
Goals such as completely banning gender-affirming care and sexuality education: done and done in Russia.
Means: creating a parallel government to control the entire bureaucracy (President's Office of Management and Budget in the US case) - done! See Putin's Presidential Administration.
Recent staff changes at the top in Russia reveal Putin's thinking about his entourage. Essentially, he divides his people into three categories: experts on the Anglo-Saxon conspiracy, old heavyweights and guys actually capable of working ("technocrats").
1/
Putin's clear preference lies with the conspiracy experts, as he's become such an expert himself. He likes to talk to them and hang with them, discussing Russia's historic mission and Western perfidy.
2/
However, he realizes that such cadres should not be appointed to the positions that require real work. As much as he enjoys listening to them (or to himself through their speeches), he reserves positions of responsibility for the "technocrats"...
3/
I am devastated by the news from Moscow. The death toll is terrible. I will not speculate about the perpetrators. Nor will I tolerate gloating comments here.
One thing I will note though. After such an attack, one wants to know the truth - and this is precisely the thing the Russian authorities cannot deliver.
In 2017, a bomb blast killed 16 and wounded 87 in Saint-Petersburg metro. The remains of a suicide bomber, Akbarzhon Jalilov, were found on site.