One macro effect of sanctions that is not often discussed: Russian Central Bank projects an astonishing $246 billion net outflow of capital in 2022 - despite capital controls!
1/
This could be explained by the mass exodus of foreign companies, but that's not it: Western companies and individuals are also subject to capital controls, they cannot move their money out of the country easily.
2/
The explanation apparently lies in the fact that exporters accumulate their profits on their foreign accounts and do not re-invest in Russia. This is registered as capital outflows.
3/
This is somewhat paradoxical: capital outflows usually lead to the weakening of the ruble, however, this year witnesses both record outflows and record strengthening of the ruble.
4/
It seems that the collapse of imports is so great that even the limited amount of currency that reaches Russia is bigger than the economy's capacity to import goods (hence the strong ruble).
5/
At the same time, vast amounts of currency do not reach Russia at all, remaining on exporters' foreign accounts (and perhaps being re-invested somewhere outside of Russia).
6/
In essence, the famed record trade surplus is directly translated into record net outflow of capital. Hence no real benefits to the Russian economy.
7/
Takeaways: 1) the ruble probably won't collapse even as oil/gas trade with Europe continues to decline, 2) nevertheless, Russia's economy is in an extremely unhealthy state, with neither trade surplus nor strong ruble indicating that "sanctions aren't working".
8/
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I am devastated by the news from Moscow. The death toll is terrible. I will not speculate about the perpetrators. Nor will I tolerate gloating comments here.
One thing I will note though. After such an attack, one wants to know the truth - and this is precisely the thing the Russian authorities cannot deliver.
In 2017, a bomb blast killed 16 and wounded 87 in Saint-Petersburg metro. The remains of a suicide bomber, Akbarzhon Jalilov, were found on site.
Despite everything, there is a tendency in the West to see Russian "elections" as actual elections.
That is, Putin's "victory" is seen as reflecting genuine popular approval of the economic performance, military successes etc.
It just doesn't work this way in dictatorships.
1/
Syria's Assad "won" with 92% of the vote while the civil war was raging across most of the country. It wasn't even clear which territories "voted" in his "elections".
Tunisia's Ben Ali "won" with 90%. A year went by and he was ousted by a popular movement.
2/
It's not a problem for consolidated authoritarian regimes to stage an electoral spectacle with any result they like.
For instance, this time Putin decided to go the Central Asian way with an almost 90% result. Easy.
3/
You know what's especially ironic? As part of the "smart voting" strategy, Navalny called to vote for the second most popular candidate in single-seat elections across the country. That candidate was usually from... the Communist Party.
For Navalny and his team, this was a tactic in the conditions of electoral authoritarianism.
They understood full well it's impossible to replace the authorities with voting in Russia, but they believed one could make a dent in the regime's stability...
2/
...with a strategic voting campaign, combined with street protests and a media assault.
In effect, Navalny called to vote for hundreds of KPRF candidates across the country. For this, he got a lot of heat from Russia's die-hard anticommunist liberals.
3/
Rustling through the pages of (relatively) old papers.
10 March 2022. Alexander Khramchikhin, a military expert who is highly patriotic and loyal to the Kremlin, but not devoid of common sense, struggles to find reasons for the invasion of Ukraine.
- Ukraine was not going to be admitted into NATO, both because of territorial conflicts with Russia and unwillingness of some NATO members to admit Ukraine.
2/
- Ukraine was not going to be the place where any US "offensive weapons" were installed. If needed, missiles could be installed in Germany, Poland, Romania. Moreover, the US would not risk advanced weapons to fall into Russian hands.
3/
Ekaterina Duntsova and Russian electoral dictatorship. A 🧵
1/
Ekaterina Duntsova is a local activist and journalist from Rzhev, a small town in central Russia known mostly for the gruesome WW2 battles that happened there.
2/
A few weeks ago she announced her candidacy for the March 2024 presidential election. Today, she was blocked from participating under some formal pretext.
3/
The conflict between Zelenskyy's office and Zaluzhnyi is apparently real. Within this conflict, people close to Zelensky leaked to WaPo what is effectively an admission that 🇺🇦 is responsible for Nord Stream.
The purpose of the leak is to blame Zaluzhnyi for the Nord Stream attack while claiming that Zelensky did not know about it.
2/
In effect, a leak to WaPo becomes a weapon in the internecine struggle, but the admission itself puts Ukraine in an incredibly tough spot diplomatically.
This just shows how destructive the spiraling conflict between Zelenskyy and Zalyzhnyi can be.
3/