Here’s how to select the right practice activities to help you become a better coach.
A thread
👇🧵👇
This thread covers
•How to decide where an athlete should be on the continuum
•What's the difference between tasks on either end of the continuum
•Why coaches should spend most time in the 'Coaching Zone'
@SundayShare10 It’s important to note that it doesn’t need to be the exact same and good coaching is scaling the constraints to suit needs of athletes.
The main focus is making sure that the athlete will be interacting with the key information to inform their actions.
@SundayShare10 Some of the important things that needs to be present for a task to be higher on the scale are
•Presence of Opponents
•Includes Decision Making
•Similar Constraints
•Scoring
•Consequences for actions
@SundayShare10 Where the best place to be on the continuum depends on the needs of the player. You can go higher or lower depending on their needs.
During a session a good coach will often surf along the continuum to challenge the player appropriately.
@SundayShare10 Lastly I want to introduce the concept of the ‘Coaching Zone’. This is the area of the continuum where the real coaching happens.
At the extremes of the continuum it’s difficult to coach effectively. Higher end is often too complex and lower end lacks the necessary complexity.
@SundayShare10 In the coaching zone the coach is usually in the ‘sweet spot’. The coach designs tasks to meet the needs of the player that are:
@SundayShare10 There will be times where coaches are at either end of the continuum-outside the coaching zone.
There is no problem with doing this once they can justify why they are doing it and don't spend the majority of every session at the extreme ends of the continuum.
@SundayShare10 Here's a nice research infographic by @NickGearing1 that looks at the practice activity continuum.
@SundayShare10@NickGearing1 If you'd like a more detailed insight check out this brilliant presentation by Keith Davids at the @MSAIreland Conference 2018
@SundayShare10@NickGearing1@MSAIreland To summarise:
•Where the task is on the continuum depends on the needs of the athlete
•Good coaches surf along the continuum during a session.
•The coaching zone is where you want to be for the majority of the session
This paper
•Introduces Ecological Dynamics as a theoretical framework for studying decision making in sport
•Discusses the different stages of developing decision making
•Gives implications for developing better decision making skills
This was a really insightful paper by @Duarterbparaujo, K Davids, @JiaYiChow1 & P Passos . It challenges many long held beliefs on the development of decision making. Implications for training at the end of the paper meant there were insights for coaches to take from the paper.
2) This is a paper by Emma Anderson, Jospeh Stone, Marcus Dunne & Ben Heller. It's a very interesting article that gives us an insight into what influences elite coaches practice designs in high performance tennis.
3)The participants in this study were ‘elite’ tennis coaches.
They have all either -
•Completed the highest level of formal tennis education,
•Spent 10+ years coaching
•Coached at highest level (grand slam events)
•Explains what traditional cricket coaching sessions focus on and the limitations of this way of coaching
•Introduces the CLA and what taking this approach entails for coaches
•How coaches can guide the discovery of effective solutions
3)This is another great introduction to the Constraints-Led Approach by @ConstraintsColl & Darren Holder. Replace the word ‘cricket’ and the sport you work in and most of the main points will be the same
@SundayShare10 2)I found it very beneficial seeing practical examples of the CLA in action. Seeing how other coaches are using it can help you become more creative in applying it. It’s important to understand the principles of Non-Linear pedagogy before using the CLA
👇
•How backyard games helped developed skillfull players
•Why you should be playing more games in practice
•Example of a constraint led-game in action and the benefits of them
3)This was written by @ConstraintsColl , Greg Chappell, D Fitzgerald, J Davison & B McFayden. It was really nice to see an article based around the design of a constraint-led game and it’s very useful for coaches of all levels to see.