Simon Bottery Profile picture
Aug 4 12 tweets 5 min read
Another damning report on #socialcare today, this time from @CommonsLUHC: “The Government currently has nothing more than a vision [for social care], with no roadmap, no timetable, no milestones, and no measures of success.”
A thread on some key points…
committees.parliament.uk/committee/17/l…
The MPs commend the Government for “introducing reforms to the sector where previous Governments failed to act”. But they say it has “not come close to rescuing #socialcare, and needs to be open with the public that there is a long way to go.” So, a long way from being ‘fixed’.
It also urges the govt not to ignore the immediate crisis in the sector: “The Government is focused on long-term reform of adult social care, but in order to get to the future it needs to save the sector from the brink of collapse.”
How to save the sector? “Ultimately, all our lines of inquiry returned to the same fundamental point: there is a large funding gap in adult social care that needs filling.” It suggests extra funding of ‘at least’ £7bn a year, mirroring an earlier @CommonsHealth report.
The report gets forensic on the details of the govt’s reform programme. It has a chart outlining how @DHSCgovuk plans to spend £5.4bn on #socialcare reform but notes that a segment outlining spending of £1.7bn in fact only totals £1.08bn. (True, if you ignore the ‘at leasts’)
It says: “The lack of information about how the reforms add up to £5.4 billion, why each reform was allocated the amount it was allocated, and how funding will be distributed, does little to instil confidence that the Government has thought through its plans.”
There is even an acid, and quite plausible, explanation of how the #socialcare reform programme was ‘costed’, which is worth quoting in full. “First, the Treasury decided that social care would get 15% of the total levy funding (15% of £36 billion is £5.4 billion)…
“…Second, the Government estimated that £3.6 billion would be needed for charging reforms, leaving £1.7 billion over three years for adult social care reform and the Department for Health and Social Care is [now] working out what to do with it.”
This is a persistent theme of the report: that @DHSCgovuk has not yet really worked out ‘what to do’ with that money. It is particularly critical on workforce, arguing that plans so far “do not amount to a strategy”. (Given they do not address pay, that is clearly correct).
Elsewhere it has largely sensible things to say about challenges and pressures on local government, housing and integration. It has a good section on unpaid carers, arguing rightly that the govt’s earmarked £25m for reform over three years is ‘totally inadequate’.
Among its other big recommendations are for ones for govt to come forward with a 10-year plan on #socialcare and give local authorities multi-year settlements to provide stability. This is sensible, if not earth-shattering, stuff.
Will it make any difference? By itself, no. It will get a polite but dismissive response from the government within two months, as required. Still, it has to be helpful that another committee with a majority of Conservative MPs is arguing so strongly for major #socialcare change.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Simon Bottery

Simon Bottery Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @blimeysimon

Jul 19
Top line on today’s @1adass survey of #socialcare directors? Funding isn’t sufficient to meet increased DEMAND and increased COSTS. But if that sounds familiar, this year there are a few important, COVID-related twists. A thread. adass.org.uk/adass-spring-b…
Let’s look at DEMAND first. Partly, this is demographics - it’s a familiar story that there are more older people, living longer; more working age people with disability, including LD; and more mental health issues. Directors think these will add 4% to budgets this year.
Added to this, the report now suggests demand arising from problems in the HEALTH system. As the NHS struggles, directors are seeing more people needing #socialcare due to early discharge from hospital, lack of community support or failure to admit people to hospital at all.
Read 14 tweets
Jun 13
I spent two days last week with social services professionals from 40+ countries at the @ESNsocial conference in Hamburg. A quick thread here on some key #socialcare themes. Very impressionistic and not always evidenced so take with large pinch of ‘salz’. essc-eu.org/about-essc-202…
Increasing demand for services seemed a consistent issue, forcing at least some countries to evaluate what they do and how. One Icelandic delegate said its country’s approach was ‘moving from a right to have services to a need to have services’.
That demand was mainly driven by long term factors, particularly ageing populations. But inevitably it was exacerbated by COVID-19, which exposed underlying structural problems. ‘We were unprepared as a sector’ said @ThomasBignal. Sound familiar? kingsfund.org.uk/publications/c…
Read 10 tweets
Mar 30
Lots of interest today in @TheKingsFund @NuffieldTrust findings about public satisfaction with the NHS. But the findings about #socialcare are no less remarkable. Only 15% say they are satisfied - the lowest of all services asked about. 50% are dissatisfied. A short thread…
This year, the survey asked WHY people are satisfied (or not). The main reasons are staff pay, unmet need, unaffordability of #socialcare and lack of support for unpaid carers. Lack of integration between health and care also gets a look in. These are familiar problems…
…and all grounded in fact: the number of people able to access long-term care has been falling since 2015/16, workforce pay has failed to keep pace with other sectors and 1 in 7 people are now estimated to face lifetime care costs of over £100,000. kingsfund.org.uk/publications/s…
Read 7 tweets
Mar 18
This is an important analysis on the implications of @DHSCgovuk 'fair cost of care' reform, which has received less attention than the 'cap' but involves an unprecedented, potentially risky intervention by govt in the #socialcare market. Quick thread:
countycouncilsnetwork.org.uk/new-analysis-w…
'Fair cost of care' basically involved the government funding local authorities to pay more for the care home places/homecare they commission. Why is government bothered about that? Two, related reasons...
1. Most councils, because they're short of cash, 'underpay' for publicly-funded care home places/homecare. To compensate, providers 'overcharge' people who self-fund their own care. This 'self-funder subsidy' is obviously unfair. However, it's not why govt is acting now...
Read 10 tweets
Dec 1, 2021
Though it has some good measures, the govt’s white paper is lightweight and underfunded to deliver real reform of adult #socialcare. A rapidly written thread on how the WP sits alongside the Health and Care Bill, Build Back Better and the spending review. gov.uk/government/pub…
First, a reminder of key stuff already announced:
- @CareQualityComm to oversee council delivery of #socialcare
- more generous means test
- £86k cap
- £500m for workforce wellbeing
- a promise of a ‘fair price of care’ to ensure selffunders pay same as publicly funded clients
The white paper tries to provide a vision that wraps these reforms together and it’s not bad: choice, control and independent lives; outstanding quality; fairness and accessibility. The problem comes when it tries to back this up with action and money.
Read 13 tweets
Feb 19, 2020
This has profound implications for #socialcare. EU workers currently make up 1 in 11 careworkers and, from January 1st, they will not be replaced when they leave. So social care will have to find more British nationality workers. 1/6 bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politi…
1 in 13 jobs (122,000) in the sector is already vacant, far higher than the average in other industries (and rising). Unemployment is low so, without EU workers, #socialcare employers will have to entice these staff from sectors like retail. 2/6
But #socialcare pays less than many other sectors, including retail. kingsfund.org.uk/blog/2019/10/c… Raising pay will therefore be critical. 3/6
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(