Maloji raje and his wife were doing vrath and aradhna of bhagwan mahadeva not any pir.....
No name of "siidha" given in contemporary shivbharat'....
V.K Rajwade tells us orgins of names shahji and Sharifji and the story of Shah-sharif is fake.
Shahji comes from simha(lion) and Sharifji comes from sharab. Simhak and sharbhak, these two names are found in Sanskrit literature.
Conclusion:
the names "shahji" and "Sharifji" were already existing in bhosale and nimbalkar family. The origins of their names were from simha and sharabh, no 'navas' of Pir shah-sharif was done by Malojiraje and his wife. The story of Shah-sharif's name given to shahji is fake.
Thread
Debunking the myth that Rajarshree Shahu Maharaj was a Brahmin hater!
This will be a really long thread I request all people to take some time out and read it!
1/22
Intelligent Brahmins were given many elite posts in his Santhan.
His Faujdar- Balvantrao Mhaiskar
His Chitnis- S G Deshpande
His Teachers- Pendse, Keshavrao Gokhle
His personal assistant- Nagesh Bhide
G. Zurle and K. Sangavkar (त्यांचे लाडके हुजरे)
And many others..
2/22
When Ghadge family friend Brahmin Naropant Kulkarni died Shahu Maharaj personally called his sons and said "You're father is not dead yet ,consider me as your father" He gave them jobs in his Sansthan took care of their family!
Bulls*it!
Shahu Raje regularly funded freedom fighters who were working against British,eg. Aurobindo Ghosh.
He even funded his hardcore opponent Tilak thousands of rupees for his bomb making factories.
Anti Shahu N C Kelkar says"Maharaj helped krantikaris as much as he could"
He was a Sansthanik of course he won't wage war openly he used to do it secretly.
He was an extremely proud Hindu he completely banned Cow slaughter in Kolhapur state,was a Staunch Devi worshiper and always used to flaunt his Hindu identity in his letters. used to go by the..
title "Hindu Pad Padshah".
You have no idea how toxic supremacist anti shahu gang was. They abused Shivaji Maharaj, Sambhaji Maharaj, Gagabhatta (himself a Deshastha brahmin) and said they met their death just because they performed Vedokta. And believe me this is nothing.
Some people who have prejudice against tatyarao are portraying he himself gave him veer title because the authorship of 1926 published book 'Life of Barrister Savarkar' by chitragupta is debatable. I'll put forth my arguments assuming that Savarkar himself wrote that book!
The Book 'Life of Barrister Savarkar' was published in 1926 but the 'Veer' Title to him was attributed much before that. Look at this biography of him Published by Sadashiv Ranade in 1924!
The contributions of Veer Savarkar after comming out of Andaman Jail🙌
After serving Prison (13 years) and Ban from Politics(14 years) When Savarkar was Completely freed in 1937 after 27 years he immediately wrote To President of America to intervene and free India From The British!
Savarkar And Hundreds of Hindu Mahasabhites were ARRESTED in 1942 Bhagalpur Fight Against The British! This Bursts the Myth that British went soft against Him!
It is ofen told to us that credit of abolishment of Sati Goes to Raja Ram Mohan Roy or Mahatma Phule in Maharashtra. But its a fact that Great Hindu Kingdoms like Peshwas and Savantvadi Marathas banned Sati Much before Phule or Roy!
We also get the British records that the rates of Sati Dropped very low in Pune about 10 Satis Per year while at the same time in Bengal It was more than 3000 satis per year.
We cant comment on ancient Practice but in modern india sati was used as a tool by the Father in Laws of the women either to lure money or to get public recognition by portraying the sati as Godess! We have several eye witnesses than women were heavily drugged with alcohol..
" HINDU NATIONALISTS SHOULD NOT AT ALL BE APOLOGETIC TO BEING CALLED HINDU COMMUNALISTS "
~V.D. Savarkar
"Territorial Unity is not the only Constituent of a Nationality What was then the root cause which brought about this miserable failure of efforts of the Congress during the last full fifty years to placate the Moslems to allow themselves to be merged into a united Indian Nation?
To persuade them to be, at any rate, Indians first and Moslems afterwards?Congress committed a serious mistake at very start of overlooking this fundamental, social and political principle that in formation of Nations, religious, racial, cultural and historical affinities count..