I have a Russian fertilizer use question for you folks.
How does this US vs Ukraine Vs Russia % fertilizer production charts showing 1/
...huge US & Ukraine fertilizer use for their respective agricultural sectors square with the low Russian fertilizer use and dramatic grain export rise talked about here?🤔👇
"The first year of the 21st century, Russia exported a modest 696,000 tonnes of wheat. Ten years later, having made tremendous inroads into Asian, Middle East and African markets, Russia increased that total to 18.5 million tonnes.
3/
By 2018, Russia more than doubled that total when it exported a jaw-dropping 41.4 million tonnes of wheat, which still stands as a record. Since then, the country has exported around 35 million tonnes per year."
4/
Green Revolution 101:
"More energy & fertilizer inputs make for more agricultural outputs"...
...so...
...where is the Russian fertilizer coming from to increase exports from 696,000 tonnes in 2001 to 35 million tonnes in 2020?
5/
The reason for the question is a piece of WW2 history that @SashoTodorov1 pointed out for @ww2tv that the Haber–Bosch artificial nitrogen fixation process that makes ammonia for fertilizer also makes propellants & explosives for artillery shells.
6/
German fought two world wars using the Haber–Bosch artificial nitrogen fixation process to make shells, which it used before each war for agriculture.
"But under (Anatoly) Serdyukov, (former minister of defense replaced by Sergei Shoigu, who did not fix any of this.)they decided to put everything on a commercial basis and all BTRZ were transferred to JSC “Spetsremont” — the daughter of
8/
...“Oboronservice” — a commercial enterprise where Serdyukov himself was one of the owners. At the same time, Serdyukov staged a fight for modernization contracts with UVZ. Moreover, he himself decided to export — even a modification of the T-72B1MS independent of UVZ was...
9/
... developed, nicknamed “White Eagle” from journalists. The problem with this tank was in one thing — customers needed an engine of 1000 hp, and UVZ had a monopoly on it. Therefore, we got to the point that they tried to make their own version of the 1000-strong in ...
10/
...Tutaev, and immediately smeared the German Renk in the person of its French branch with an automatic transmission ESM 350. But they didn’t succeed."
Given the utter corruption of Russian minister of Sergei Shoigu after Anatoly Serdyukov, the idea that most Russian
11/
...artillery propellent & explosive production was diverted as fertilizer in the Russian agricultural sector for most of the 2000's looks plausible.
One of the things that fell out of Peter Schweizer book
..."Reagan's War: The Epic Story of His Forty-Year Struggle and Final Triumph Over Communism" was the CIA's economic data on the Russian economy was awful and William Casey brought in a large number of business community 'irregulars' he ran out of the White House
13/
...so the rest of the CIA couldn't listen in on his CIA office lines.
Special Assistant to the Director of Central Intelligence Herbert E. Meyer confirmed Casey's 'Russian economy irregulars' in a 4 Nov. 2005 American Thinker article titled "Two Questions for George Tenet."
14/
Both Schweizer & Meyer's point on how the CIA had no clue as to economic inputs to Russian artillery shell manufacturing (or anything else) can be seen in how it computed Russian shell stocks via satellite images and late 1960's 15/ cia.gov/readingroom/do…
...Warsaw logistical documents brought to them via defectors.
This CIA "Compute Soviet Bloc artillery shell stocks stocks from old documents & satellite photos" was used from the 1960's until the end of the Cold War.
16/
This satellite intelligence method does not give me confidence the CIA would catch such a chemical feedstock diversion from shells to grain, given CIA missed the fact that Russian Army artillery didn't use mechanized logistics for its entire organization existence.
Wayne Jordash's take down of the @amnesty report on the Ukrainian military is a must read, see the link.👇
1/ What is wrong with Amnesty International’s Conclusions that "Ukrainian fighting tactics endanger civilians" pravda.com.ua/eng/columns/20…
International humanitarian law (IHL) requires a national military to act responsibly, try to mitigate collateral damage & maintain discipline to prevent/punish war crimes.
NGO's reporting on IHL failings must meet high standards of proof and investigative due diligence.
2/
The Wayne Jordash piece demonstrates @amnesty failed that standard when it's press release claimed "Ukrainian fighting tactics endanger civilians".
3/
"Now a new report from the Washington Institute For Defence And Security and the New York Center For Foreign Policy Affairs has revealed that some of those 'lost' women and children may be being trafficked to the UAE.
2/
...Researchers have said that many Russian oligarchs have sought refuge in the Gulf state to avoid international sanctions and are in need of Russian-speaking staff.
Although the issue of trafficking to the UAE is not in itself new, the report says it is set to be...
3/
@ameliairheart@vcdgf555 There was some Ukrainian talk in 2015 of doing deep refits of their FLANKER B/C at MiGRemont in Zaporozhiye to something like a Su-27UP FLANKER C with the Mil-Std-1760C digital bus for digital smart weapons with refreshed digital AA-10 ALAMO using new seekers.
No money for it.
@ameliairheart@vcdgf555 MiGRemont deep refit upgrades include Nav/Comm, Navaids/GNSS (includes ILS, not clear the VOR/DME is TACAN compatible), ICAO compatible transponders, and a digital recorder to FLASH storage for the legacy ILS-31 HUD. Included a colour digital display controller to drive the
2/
@ameliairheart@vcdgf555 HUD projector. Included a dual calibre 50mm and 26mm dispenser - not NATO compatible.
The above is common on both FLANKER Su-27 and FROGFOOT Su-25.
The FLANKER upgrade includes a new nav computer, and dedicated weapon delivery computer providing more accurate dumb munition
3/
Note "95% of incoming threats" that @IsraelRadar_com mentioned does not mean all rockets are intercepted.
It means the Iron Dome radar & computer software assess all the incoming rockets against pre-programed 'keep out zones' & then engage those rockets with Tamir missiles.
This is visual evidence for 2021 of how Iron Domes' Tamir interceptor software was upgraded to destroy the nose section of Palestinian rockets (H/T @TheDeadDistrict) since 2014 and reduced the number of Tamirs needed to kill a rocket to a single Tamir.