SIU v Aventino Group hearing. This relates to the Talana shacks in Limpopo 👇👇👇
Presiding Judge: Soma Naidoo
Counsel for the SIU and the Housing Development Agenct: Adv TC Kwinda
Counsel for respondents: Adv Malose Monene assisted by Adv George Mokonoto
Counsel for the SIU and the Housing Development Agenct: Adv TC Kwinda
Counsel for respondents: Adv Malose Monene assisted by Adv George Mokonoto
Adv Kwinda tells the Special Tribunal that there is an application for postponement of the R15 million Talana shacks hearing.
Based on the instructions, the application for postponement by Aventino Group would be opposed.
Documents were uploaded on caseline late last week.
Based on the instructions, the application for postponement by Aventino Group would be opposed.
Documents were uploaded on caseline late last week.
Adv Kwinda submits that the instructions to oppose the application is based on the respondents' non adherence to the directives issued by Modiba J on the 29th July 2022.
Adv Mokonoto submits that at the commencement they would ask for the matter to stand down for about 30 minutes to engage with him with the issues that they would want to bring to the Special Tribunal.
Adv Monene suggests that they intend introducing a settlement agreement.
Adv Monene suggests that they intend introducing a settlement agreement.
Aventino Group tells the Special Tribunal through Adv Monene that they propose a settlement agreement in the R15 million contract.
The SIU Counsel agrees that the matter stand down until 10H45 to take further instructions.
Proceedings adjourn until 10H45
The SIU Counsel agrees that the matter stand down until 10H45 to take further instructions.
Proceedings adjourn until 10H45
Proceedings resume.
Adv Mokonoto proposes that they seem to have found each other in respect of the settlement agreement. However the parties want to finalize a few instructions and will be back in court once they have concluded.
Adv Kwinda for the applicants agrees.
Adv Mokonoto proposes that they seem to have found each other in respect of the settlement agreement. However the parties want to finalize a few instructions and will be back in court once they have concluded.
Adv Kwinda for the applicants agrees.
After the break of an hour the parties are back.
Counsel for the SIU submits that they received the proposal from Aventino Group. However the senior management of the SIU is not available in the office today to peruse the details of the proposal.
Counsel for the SIU submits that they received the proposal from Aventino Group. However the senior management of the SIU is not available in the office today to peruse the details of the proposal.
The parties seek postponement for the Special Tribunal to adjourn until Thursday, 11th August 2022.
This will give the SIU time to confirm the details of the settlement agreement.
If not approved, the matter will proceed on opposed basis.
This will give the SIU time to confirm the details of the settlement agreement.
If not approved, the matter will proceed on opposed basis.
ORDER
1. The matter is postponed to Thursday, 11 August 2022
2. In the event the SIU rejects the settlement agreement the parties will agree on the further conduct of the proceedings.
3. The issue of the costs are to be incorporated in the settlement agreement.
Proceedings end.
1. The matter is postponed to Thursday, 11 August 2022
2. In the event the SIU rejects the settlement agreement the parties will agree on the further conduct of the proceedings.
3. The issue of the costs are to be incorporated in the settlement agreement.
Proceedings end.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
