Ian Goodrum Profile picture
Aug 9 22 tweets 6 min read
The US Senate has axed an effort to cap the out-of-pocket cost of insulin at $35.

This would have been a big drop from the $98 average, and far less than the thousands some have reported they pay.

But in China, you can get it for as low as $3 at a public hospital.

Here's how.
The year is 2018.

A film, 我不是药神 (Dying to Survive), has had a wide release. It is a huge hit.

The movie follows a man who illegally smuggles life-saving cancer drugs into China and is based on a true story.

Think of it as Dallas Buyers Club with no Jared Leto (thank God).
This social drama about a very real problem — the high cost of prescription drugs — touched a chord with audiences.

Even though the story it is based on is from 2004, there were plenty of contemporary examples of families and patients overburdened by drug costs.
The film got such attention that Premier Li Keqiang commented on its relevance, making reference to it in a call for price cuts on life-saving medicines.

Not too long after, in November that same year, a major policy was introduced.
But first, some background.

China achieved universal health care in 2011 through the expansion of its public insurance system, with over 95 percent of the population covered by the government's umbrella programs.

But this coverage has some gaps and inequities.
Public insurance is tiered, with the highest level of coverage for urban workers who have matching household registration or hukou (户口).

Those not currently working, or urban residents outside their city of registry — migrant workers — are on a lower level.
Rural populations, meanwhile, are on the New Cooperative Medical System (NCMS).

Each of these tiers guarantees basic coverage, but health care resources are still lopsided and concentrated in population centers largely on the country's east coast.
So while this expansion of health insurance has meant improvements in out-of-pocket expense, there has still been an overall trend of unbalanced development.

As such, families will often travel to major cities outside their main coverage area and just pay the extra cost.
Anyone who has been to a public hospital in China knows how crowded they can be and how overwhelmed the doctors there are.

In recent years there has been enormous government expenditure to change this, but it is still a work in progress.

Graphics by Bloomberg.
As those efforts ramp up, China has found other, more immediate advantages it can leverage to bring down costs for patients.

Like, say, a public insurance pool of 1.4 billion and a near-monopoly on hospital administration.
In November 2018, China announced a pilot program for "volume-based procurement" (VBP), a centralized drug price negotiation scheme for public insurance holders and hospitals.

It would cover generic and new drugs alike, and was expanded to include medical devices in 2019.
Thanks to its massive purchasing power, the Chinese government has been able to bargain directly with pharma companies and wrangle enormous discounts on essential drugs for its patients.

How enormous? Let's take the example of the lung cancer drug afatinib, brand name Gilotrif.
Gilotrif is manufactured by Boehringer Ingelheim, who filed a patent for the drug in 2013. A generic won't be available in the US until January 2031.

Here's how much 28 40mg tablets cost. I plugged an NYC zip code into this tool to get the brand-name price.

Almost $7,000.
Generics are available in other countries, and it is technically possible to get them shipped to the US.

However! Still expensive. Should cancer drugs cost even this much?
Well, it just so happens afatinib was part of the latest round of VBP in China this July.

Check out the entry for 30 40mg tablets, an identical dosage to the ones we just saw.

Less than $40, and that's the sticker price. Insurance subsidizes it further.

Translations by me.
Which brings us back to insulin. In 2021, the drug was finally included in China's VBP, dropping its already low price in the country further.

Here's an analysis from BaiPharm. I converted the yuan to USD for easy comparison.

Lowest price is $2.65, and all are below $10.
You might say, hey! That is very cheap. But Big Pharma wouldn't be doing this if they weren't making a profit, right? Someone is still getting screwed.

You'd be right...
...the multinationals are taking a bath.

Novo Nordisk, one of the world's biggest insulin producers, announced a 3 percent haircut in its GLOBAL sales due to slashed China prices necessitated by VBP negotiations.
Now to be fair, these companies are expecting long-term gains. They are willing to accept some margin of loss on their generics if it means entry to the Chinese market and the opportunities therein.

But time will tell whether they reap those benefits or not.
Regardless of what Nordisk and Eli Lilly think they see in their crystal balls, the VBP program has been wildly successful. It has saved hundreds of billions of yuan.

That's money that gets freed up for the necessary improvements in medical infrastructure we talked about before.
This policy, and many others since the founding of the People's Republic in 1949, have led to huge, positive changes in basic quality-of-life indexes.

(Graphics from Bloomberg, circa 2019. China beat projections and passed the US in life expectancy in 2021.)
So yes, there is another way. Insulin doesn't need to cost hundreds or thousands, and neither do countless other life-saving drugs.

A better world is possible. We don't have to die to survive.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Ian Goodrum

Ian Goodrum Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @isgoodrum

Jun 25
Some of the world's biggest twerps are using one line of text from a 25-page document as proof China has restricted abortion.

This is a blatant ploy to spin the overturning of Roe, a monstrous crime, into an opportunity to flog their pet cause.

Here's how they're lying to you.
It is true that the highlighted text reads "Reduce non-medically necessary abortions." But cherry-picking this sentence without the broader context is extremely disingenuous.
The full translation of the paragraph it appears in is as follows (quick and dirty machine translation):
Read 8 tweets
Jun 12
China's health commission has simplified the process for gender confirmation surgery approval, lessened the requirements for a change of gender on identification documents and lowered the minimum age for the procedure from 20 to 18.

This is a very positive development.
An overview of the changes.
1. "Gender dysphoria" and "gender incongruence" have been added as equivalent diagnoses to "transsexualism", which was the earlier prerequisite for surgery. This is a big step forward in de-pathologizing trans identity, though "transsexualism" remains on the books.
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(