(📢) This is serious—and fully explains the Mar-A-Lago search. Amidst an investigation seeking documents implicating national security, the FBI found that Trump’s agents were lying—a federal felony. And why were they lying? To *steal classified documents*. cnn.com/2022/08/09/pol…
What we don’t know yet is who directed these Trump agents to lie—though I’ll give you one guess who it’d probably have to be for them to willingly commit a federal felony the FBI routinely arrests people for—and why Trump desperately needed to hold onto these classified documents
It goes without saying that even a career criminal like Trump wouldn’t seek to steal classified documents unless those documents in some way incriminated him in a larger crime than the stealing of classified documents in the first place constitutes, so this is extremely serious
The conspiracy to hide these documents from the FBI also suggests a level of premeditation, desperation and coordination that points to how significant these national security-implicating documents must be, and suggests they’re documents the FBI needs for an ongoing investigation
The FBI is now engaged in the largest investigation in the history of the Bureau, and it’s focused on Trump and January 6, so if Occam’s Razor means anything it suggests Trump may be hiding classified documents that would incriminate him in Seditious Conspiracy or even Treason
While we can’t know these things for certain, I mention that they currently constitute the theory of the case all the extant evidence suggests as a way of underscoring that anyone presuming this was a political stunt is carefully rejecting every single more plausible explanation
After Watergate, Nixon had to resign because he sought to hide evidence that’d incriminate him in the break-in of a building that was a political target
Here, Trump apparently seeks to hide evidence that’d incriminate him in the break-in of a building that was a political target
So based on the information we have so far, understanding that there’s likely much more information to come, anyone who is upset that a court granted a search warrant to search Mar-A-Lago is in effect saying that Watergate never should’ve been investigated
Just keep that in mind
The search’s timing is exactly what we’d expect based on how long Trump kept the government records he stole, how long it took the FBI to review them and how long it’d take agents to realize key data was missing as they were being lied to by Trump’s agents likely at his direction
All in all the picture that emerges is of a former president committing crimes as significant as those in Watergate and instructing others to commit crimes on his behalf and then shrieking incoherently the moment federal law enforcement sought to do anything whatsoever about it
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
They didn't even care enough about the American economy to do any of the work themselves.
It almost feels... impeachable?
How could sloppily using AI to create domestic policy, then hiding it, be consistent with the Oath of Office? theverge.com/news/642620/tr…
This explains everything. The bad tariff math, placing tariffs on uninhabited islands, the odd errors that keep popping up in administration texts, the fact that Musk has said he wants to replace the humans in our government with AI, the fact that he *runs an AI company*.... JFC!
So much makes sense now. The website deletions that seem based on the most imbecilic reading of search results, the bizarrely high number of EOs, the obsession with the idea that people don't matter because AI can do everything in government... few if any humans are at the wheel!
Musk is now a bigger fount for toxic, self-aggrandizing bullshit than P.T. Barnum ever was.
He’s an utter 🤡—and that’s both a historical and provable fact. There’s nothing non-journalistic about observing when a man has become infamous for his rank nonsense and foolish gambits.
But that’s only the start of the story.
PROOF has outlined—with full sourcing—how Musk for years avoided politics on the advice of his father, and for years avoided revealing his far-right ideologies for fear they would destroy his business empire.
He was right. It’s happening.
In other words, he *knew* his far-right ideologies would be grotesque to consumers.
He *knew* that if he entered politics in America, those ideologies would cause him to become an instant target for hate from a majority of patriotic Americans—who unlike him believe in democracy.
Musk has been told—repeatedly—that this is a lie. The global population is rising and will continue to rise until 2100, then it’ll decline slightly. Many countries, JUST NOT MAJORITY WHITE ONES, have over-replacement birth rates. Musk focuses on a small number of white nations.
So no, there are NO experts in this field who agree humanity is dying. There are NO experts who have a longterm underpopulation concern. There are NO experts who agree with Musk. The ONLY people concerned are white supremacists who worry white nations may become SLIGHTLY smaller.
But his lie is worse than this. He KNOWS and has been TOLD that rich, developed, often—but certainly not exclusively—majority-white nations see a birth rate decline BECAUSE of their wealth. That’s normal. It does not mean those nations will collapse, just reduce slightly in size.
1. Elon Musk has many biographers; none are “official.” 2. I’m a Musk biographer; I don’t use Musk as a source because he’s a known pathological liar. 3. My second Musk biography (first is below) arrives in 2026.
4. Grok is aware I’m a Musk biographer, as is the world (see my bio excerpt below, from my website). But Grok, by Musk’s design, sometimes struggles to access Substack—which confuses it about my status. 5. I’m a multiple-time NYT-bestselling biographer of public figures.
(🧵3/3)
6. Elongelicals have a favorite Musk biographer—Isaacson—as Walt tells them what they want to hear. He just repeats what Elon says and is himself a fanboy. My methodology is different: I’m a curatorial journalist. 7. You want fan-fiction? Go with Walt. For the truth, me.
ICE used to be a legal operation. Now—without it ever confirming for a judge it has the right person and has a reasonable basis to take irrevocable government action—this is a kidnapping.
If you see something like this, report it to the police.
What the police can do is contact ICE to confirm it conducted an operation that resulted in the seizure of a specific person.
If ICE refuses to confirm the seizure of that person at that time, the police have a Kidnapping on their hands.
They'll be required to act accordingly.
If ICE confirms the seizure of that person at that time, the police can ask when the court hearing for the seized person is so friends and/or family reporting a Kidnapping will be able to attend and speak on the seized person's behalf. If ICE refuses to provide the information...