If you follow a lot of Ukrainians, you might have noticed them using pictures of cotton flowers whenever a target in Russia gets hit. A lot of Ukrainians also have references to cotton in the user pictures and/or usernames. This is a reference to yet another great wartime meme!
You see, whenever the Ukrainian army hits a target close to or behind enemy lines (or, you know, whenever a careless Russian soldier decides to smoke near a large batch of explosives), the Russian media go out of their way to downplay the importance of what’s happening.
So instead of using the word “взрыв” (explosion) they tend to use softer euphemisms such as “хлопок” (small bang). Now, the funny thing about that word is that, depending on how you accentuate it, хлопок can mean both “small bang or clapping noise” and “cotton”. So Ukrainians
have started joking around about the Ukrainian army being a prominent supplier of high quality cotton to the Russian federation, and cotton flowers have become a lovely, subtle symbol of Ukrainian resistance. Especially when we use they Ukrainian word for cotton — бавовна, which
Russians don’t understand and tend to see as some kind of mysterious codeword. #wartime_memes

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Oleksandra Povoroznyk 🇺🇦

Oleksandra Povoroznyk 🇺🇦 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @rynkrynk

Aug 11
I’m sorry, did Putin and his authoritarian regime spring out, fully formed and wielding unbreakable power, out of nowhere, way back in 1991? No. The reason why Putin grew into the monster he is now is that he was allowed to do so by every single Russian who chose to be apolitical
in exchange for a quiet and calm life. He slowly surrounded himself with yes-men and thugs of all calibres, slowly grew his influence and tightened the screws while the general public remained generally indifferent. When Ukrainian society fought against Yanukovych and his corrupt
cronies, pretty much every Russian person I know either pretended they didn’t know what was happening, or made fun of us for being майдауны (the best way I can translate this horrific and popular pun is “having Mai-Down’s syndrome. Yeah) or bemoaned the fact that Ukrainians were
Read 10 tweets
Aug 10
Alright, here’s an admittedly odd question for those of you who might have studied/majored in/taken a course in anything concerning modern Russian society/contemporary Russian culture: did your curriculum focus at on АУЕ (aka Russian prison culture) at all?
Because here’s the thing: I am convinced that people who have seen several memes about wolves doing push-ups and refusing to perform in the circus (memes about wolves are a big part of said subculture), and know a little about понятия (unwritten rules of conduct among criminals)
have a much better understanding of how modern Russian society works than people who’ve read Dostoyevsky cover to cover and have written essays about cancel culture coming for Russian ballet. Now, so far I can’t prove my theory, but I still wish more foreigners understood what
Read 5 tweets
Aug 9
If you feel like learning more about the incestual bond between Russian art and colonialism, and also about how the West often fails to notice said bond, read up on DAU. If you want the cliff notes version, here goes:
back in the 2010s, Russian director
Ilya Khrzhanovsky (with financial backing from some pretty shady Russian businessmen) set out to make his “most controversial and ambitious” (in his words — I’d call it “perverse and imperialist”) project — a biopic about the Soviet physicist
Lev Landau, nicknamed “Dau”. So, what was so ambitious (and perverse) about a biopic about a Soviet scientist? Well, DAU wasn’t just a movie. It was a huge multimedia project. Thanks to an insane amount of money from Russian businessman Serguei Adoniev, Khrzhanovsky managed to
Read 21 tweets
Aug 7
I’ve spent some time thinking about the phrases a lot of international organisations and foreign politicians have been using to describe Russia’s invasion of my homeland and I couldn’t put my finger of what exactly seemed off about their wording. And then it hit me.
Most of the time their descriptions make it sound as if the war is merely a pissing contest between two political powers with equal influence, and as if it’s the “regular folk” who need saving from the soldiers on both sides. A lot of the time I even see and hear phrases like
“we need to protect ALL civilians” or “we stand for ALL victims” and, honestly, that is utter nonsense. The only civilians suffering are the Ukrainian ones. Because all of the action is happening on Ukrainian soil, and all of us are in constant danger. The only victims here are
Read 7 tweets
Aug 7
When I was an eighteen-year-old first year student at @NaUKMA, our philosophy professor had us read about Max Weber’s two ethical approaches to politics: ethics of conviction and ethics of responsibility. My mind was BLOWN by the simple idea that, by blindly following one’s
beliefs (as good as they might be in theory), a person might not always be doing the right thing for the people affected by their actions. Now, obviously Weber was focusing on politicians when he wrote that one should preferably have both the passion to follow one’s convictions
and the responsibility to think about how they may actually affect the world around you, but I think this also applies to the current situation with @amnesty. Following one’s convictions by calling out every possible misstep any army in the world does may sound good in theory,
Read 7 tweets
Aug 6
Alright, I might be mistaken, but I’m kind of getting a feeling that some of the especially bad coverage coming out of Ukraine is a result of the general public kind of being used to the war over here, and so platforms feel like they need to frame their (usually more or less
harmless findings in increasingly provocative ways to get their clicks and views. So a documentary mostly filled with people saying stuff about how difficult it is to track the weapons sent to Ukraine but that they aren’t worried about them being misplaced… is shared as a tweet
SCREAMING something insanely clickbait-y like “WHY isn’t UKRAINE telling us WHERE the weapons we’ve sent them are going?”. And yeah, I’ve worked in online media long enough to know that, sadly, you do have to hustle to survive in this environment. But come on, people, this time
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(