The UKHSA has identified 116 isolates of type 2 polio virus (oral polio vaccine virus) in sewage samples from eight London Boroughs. The genetic analysis indicates that they're likely related to the virus imported in Feb, suggesting community transmission has been established 🧵
There have been no cases of associated paralysis, but this is worrying. The oral polio vaccine virus is a weakened virus- doesn't generally cause paralysis, but it can if given the chance (through community transmission & mutation) revert to higher virulence and cause paralysis
The current strain circulating seems to be the vaccine virus which was probably imported from someone who was given the oral vaccine abroad. The polio virus (and the vaccine polio virus) spread through wastewater/sewage & faecal transmission.
Unfortunately, there are signs that the usually benign vaccine virus is mutating into more virulent forms. The UKHSA report that a few cases of 'vaccine derived' polio virus have been detected. This virus is closer to the wild type and can cause serious illness & paralysis.
The reason we're seeing transmission of vaccine virus in the community is likely due to poor sanitation, and lower uptake of polio vaccine in recent years- particularly in England- and in England in parts of London.
England, and particularly parts of London are below the WHO target for polio vaccination in children- set at 95%. And this puts regions with lower vaccine uptake at risk of outbreaks, and community spread.
It's clear that community transmission has now been happening since Feb '22 when the first vaccine virus was detected in sewage. 6 months of transmission is giving the virus plenty of chance to mutate. We need to break this.
Better sanitation, hygiene, and vaccine catch-up are the best ways of doing this. Booster vaccines are now being offered to all 1-9 yr olds in affected areas. Please do take your child for these if they're invited.
Check their red book and contact your GP if they haven't had all their doses. Children are supposed to have 5 doses - 3 doses 4 wks apart in their first year of life, one before school (3 yrs 4 months), and one in teenage yrs (14 yrs). Make sure your child has had these.
The vaccine being given in the UK is not the oral polio vaccine that can spread and revert to higher virulence. It's an injectable vaccine of inactivated virus that poses no risk of transmission, so these are very safe.
I'm concerned about the increase in vaccine hesitancy and lowered uptake of vaccines we've been seeing in the UK during recent years (before everyone blames this on COVID, worth pointing out that drops in polio vaccine uptake predate COVID).
We need much stronger public health messaging around childhood vaccination - we've seen huge disinformation campaigns around COVID vaccination directed at parents. And anti-public health stances become more popular. It's important that these don't have knock on effects.
There's a level of complacency perhaps because the UK hasn't seen a huge burden of infectious diseases for a while (which may explain the failed response to COVID). Believe me, re-emergence of infectious disease that have been eliminated isn't something we want to see again.
With COVID and monkeypox, and re-emergence of several threats across the globe, it's important to act early and fast to break these chains of transmission as a matter of urgency- rather than wait for 6 months as community transmission gets established before acting...

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Dr. Deepti Gurdasani

Dr. Deepti Gurdasani Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @dgurdasani1

Aug 9
Worth noting that this is a much smaller study than the US one of 780,000 children- and the authors very clearly state that it was underpowered. In fact the risk reported in the study for diabetes are consistent with those in the CDC study- but sample size is smaller. 🧵
The authors also make clear that they couldn't assess incidence (unlike the US study) because it was cross-sectional. These two limitations would make it very underpowered to identify any increase in incidence of diabetes.
I find it interesting how studies that are smaller with negative results are often portrayed by the same experts as 'reassuring', while larger ones with far less re-assuring results are either not discussed or criticised - despite the limitations largely underestimating any risk.
Read 8 tweets
Aug 8
Important letter on Adv being extremely unlikely to be the cause of fulminant hepatitis in children. Very likely to be activation of persistent virus in severe illness- an incidental finding. With COVID as the likely cause. 👇
The authors also express a real concern about children receiving incorrect treatment because of what they describe as 'weak evidence'. I'm still astonished by the groupthink around this in the UK paeds community, when it's clear that this is most likely an incidental finding.
The global paeds community doesn't seem to be buying this either- given the differences in treatment in many other countries- and the shift towards treatment with steroids, or as a post-covid complication.
Read 6 tweets
Aug 6
Getting trolled incessantly for saying that FFP3 masks (if well fitting) provide high protection from infection & if I could only have one mitigation, I'd choose them over others because they massively reduce my risk & protect me/others irrespective of variant/waning immunity🧵
Of course in reality, we have the option for multilayered mitigations - at least in some controlled contexts- and I use every single layer of these. I use high-grade masks, ventilation, air-cleaning, limit socialisation indoors, do rapid testing and have been boosted twice.
But the purpose of this was to say that we shouldn't underestimate the efficiency of NPIs like high-grade masks. There is strong public messaging around vaccines/therapies (as there should be), but not about well-fitting FFP2+ masks which are v. effective at preventing infection.
Read 11 tweets
Aug 6
2 things this 🧵doesn't say-
-the study has limitations but most of these will *underestimate* risk.
-the evidence is v. consistent with that in adults
-yes, absolute risk of *all diseases* is low in children, but that doesn't mean that 1.9x increases in risk should be ignored!
yes, blood clots, diabetes are very rare in children, but if something is increasing the incidence, we do need to take it seriously. We know SARS-CoV-2 is a vascular & multi-system disease & children are not magically immune from its impacts.
We don't need thousands of children to be disabled by it before we act. Paediatric cancers are rare, but we still treat them. Deaths from other childhood illnesses are also rare, but we still try to prevent them (or at least we should!).
Read 5 tweets
Aug 5
I sometimes wonder if we will see long-term shifts in geopolitical power along lines of countries that understand pandemic response, the devastation that infectious diseases can wreak & those who don't... countries that followed the precautionary principle & those who didn't.🧵
It's becoming clear that COVID-19 is having a major impact on the economy and economic recovery - particularly in countries like the UK that let it rip. I wonder what the long-term consequences of this will be- on society, health & economy.
It also looks like anti-science disinformation movements have taken hold strongly in the West, and we've seen a decline in the role science plays in policy, and public communication. The void has been filled with disinformation. In some cases govts have leaned into this.
Read 8 tweets
Aug 5
I don't understand this- why would 'most agree' on vaccines & therapeutics but not NPIs like ventilation, masks, quarantine - when it's sufficiently clear that a vaccine only approach isn't enough - because we still have mass societal disruption & impact to public health.
Surely, this is an odd stance on public health, given the first step is primary prevention of infection - rather than reduction in severity alone. The NHS is literally in crisis- are we seriously saying that the current state of affairs is ok? And air cleaning is going too far?
To me this completely elucidates everything that's wrong with the UK/Western response- the focus on technology that only offers limited protection rather than multi-layered public health measures known to combat infectious disease is something I'll never understand.
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(