If the prosecution talks, defense lawyers file motions like these, which can lead to dismissal of the indictments.
Maybe that's secretly what the GOP leaders want, but good prosecutors really don't like getting their indictments dismissed for prosecutorial misconduct.
2/
It was interesting to see the GOP leaders start heckling the DOJ to talk.
Until now, the demands for answers came from Trump critics who were demanding that Merrick Garland update the public on the progress of the investigation.
3/
The shift is because the investigation has become public.
It's pretty clear that the DOJ did as much as they possibly could behind closed doors before finally letting the cat out of the bag by grabbing the phone of a sitting Congressman and searching Mar-a-Lago.
4/
While the investigation was happening entirely behind closed doors, Trump critics felt frustrated.
Sensationalists had nothing to say. 'We don't know anything" is boring so they went with "Garland is too wimpy to do anything."
Now Trump supporters are frustrated.
5/
At this point I think it's safe to assume that the DOJ prosecutors will just ignore them all.
I forget whether it was Monaco or Garland who said "we speak through our indictments."
Which reminds me: I remain skeptical of all the reporting of what the search of Mar-a-Lago was about because all info is coming from Team Trump and Trump is a liar.
7/
I am putting this here because it's ridiculous.
The DOJ is not "damned" if it honors ethical obligations and refuses to compromise the integrity of an investigation because people want them to.
The prosecution has everyone confused because they are framing the case as "election fraud" and "election interference" so everyone is trying to connect the crimes we know about to "election fraud."
This would be clear: "It is election fraud. Here is how the evidence will support a charge of election fraud." Then show how the behavior supports election fraud.
For years I was perplexed by what I was seeing on left-leaning Twitter, political blogs, and partisan reporting.
I had the feeling that, in its way, what I was seeing was comparable to Fox: Lots of bad information and even unhinged conspiracy theories.
2terikanefield.com/invented-narra…
Of course, if I suggested that, I was blasted for "both-sidesing."
Then I discovered an area of scholarship: Communications and the overlap between communications and political science.
Another contradiction: when people demanded indictments RIGHT NOW (in 2021 and early 2022) the reason was, "Everyone knows he's guilty! Look at all the evidence!"
We saw the J6 committee findings.
Trump isn't saying "I didn't do it." He's saying, "I had the right to do it."
2
We all know what he did. The question is, "Do people want a president who acts like Trump?"
A lot of people do.
People show me polls that a guilty finding would change minds.
I say rubbish. Use common sense. He lost in 2020 and he lost the popular vote in 2016. . .
3/