Thread by @Florin_Uncovers

Others have already revealed troll @AtomsksSanakan is scientist Nana Owusu-Boaitey, although he repeatedly denied it.

Therefore I set to factcheck if the David Gorski endorsed troll comparing people to Holocaust deniers or bullying them as mentally ill & dumb is indeed Nana.
1/n

2. Beside @fraudofseo's find, there was also a Nana Owusu-Boaitey collaborator. But 1st to provide evidence was @msabouri. So @AtomsksSanakan denied it, made his signature threat to report, twisted the Twitter rules & claimed Nana is a girl name. Not in Ghana where Nana's from.

3. Using public information I'll show Nana Owusu-Boaitey & @AtomsksSanakan are the same person which is not doxxing no matter how he twists the Twitter rules to claim otherwise. I'm not doing it to spite Atomsk, but to show how bullying scientist Nana uses anonymity unethically!

4. @atomskssanakan lived in MD, is linked to UMBC, studied Ethics & Biology, in Jul 2012 was a 21yro doing a PhD in Immunology.
Nana Owusu-Boaitey lived in MD, graduated at UMBC,
studied Ethics & Biology, in Jul 2012 was a 21yro doing a PhD in Immunology at WUSTL.

5. @AtomsksSanakan decided to do a medical school after his Immunology PhD. He also lived in PEI & Halifax, Canada with his wife.
Nana Owusu-Boaitey also decided to do @CWRUSOM medical school after his Immunology PhD. He also lived in PEI & Halifax, Canada with his wife.

6. Using just public information (no private data was provided in this thread so there's no doxxing) it is abundantly clear that @AtomsksSanakan is indeed Nana K. Owusu-Boaitey. This is relevant because Nana is using the Atomsk account unethically both scientifically & socially!

7. @AtomsksSanakan created this fake image of himself being a successful published scientist posing as an authority in debunking and criticizing other scientists. In reality, beside his E.coli PhD thesis, Nana Owusu-Boaitey has never authored any study!
orcid.org/0000-0003-0974…

8. As coauthor @AtomsksSanakan only had several minor contributions. Which is a good thing since he claimed stage 3 trials don't test safety. Statistics-wise he falsely claimed if 0 is in the CI, he can infer the pop. mean to be 0! @andrewtlevin had Nana screen Covid19 studies?😬

9. MD who doesn't get drug safety nor Statistics might decide on public or patients' health? Meanwhile Nana's attack of @DrJBhattacharya was lauded by @stephaniemlee @DrRachaelF @TriggerLoop @drjenndowd @SGriffin_Lab @mbeisen @siminevazire @JohnRInglis 🐏

https://twitter.com/AtomsksSanakan/status/1364001041109385218

10. On 14 Aug '20 Owusu-Boaitey is added by @andrewtlevin to his SARS2 meta-study 3rd version. Nana @AtomsksSanakan starts pushing it & using it more aggressively in debates. While mimicking impartiality & failing to say he's coauthor! One with no grasp of Statistics & unethical!

11. We should check the 2 studies Owusu-Boaitey coauthored with @andrewtlevin @GidMK @BillHanage @anup_malani @baileyfosdick @satejsoman for Nana's statistical error. Maybe they used the "0 in CI" fallacy to 'disappear' inconvenient seroprevalence studies.
FYA: @GlobalHealthBMJ

12. Beside his scientific shortfalls, Nana Owusu-Boaitey used @AtomsksSanakan to bully, blackmail, accuse people of mental illness & retardation, sexual harassment, etc. He also hypocritically accused & reported others of the things HE was doing.
FYA: @KeithMHarmon @UMBC

13. From the many hurtful or plainly deranged @AtomsksSanakan tweets this one stands out: he repeatedly harassed and bullied a veteran by calling him a mentally ill senile! As a @CWRUSOM MD student does Nana Owusu-Boaitey know most veterans suffer from PTSD? FYA: @CynthiaKubuPhD

14. I started feeling depressed reading @AtomsksSanakan's abusive tweets because I realized there are literarily hundreds of them! It all turned into farce when I noticed he called others silly tens of times while this week he got me suspended for 12hrs for using silly once!🤨

15. What's not silly is Nana Owusu-Boaitey smearing me as being like the Holocaust deniers! I've been fighting anti-Semitism since I was 16 so this is very hurtful to me. His reason? Because I stated the fact Baltimore still thinks the SARS2 FCS could be a sign of engineering!

16. Instead of stopping he doubled down when I stated the fact Gallaher's FCS hypothesis hasn't been validated. It's rather speculative & flawed. He then teamed up for a 3rd time with @ScienceBasedMed's David Gorski @waynestate who when further and smeared me as anti-Semitic!

17. Once again, this is not doxxing. I also don't want him suspended. I just wanted to show Nana is not using @AtomsksSanakan for a good cause but also to hurt people & project the false image of a scientific authority. When he's actually just a dilettante.
A bully & a charlatan!

FYA: @BallouxFrancois @WashburneAlex @MartinKulldorff @alexandrosM @Graybea71861266 @SebViret @vinamrsachdeva @drvictoriafox @marsouin4

@threader unroll