Yesterday the CA Senate held a hearing on “Lessons Learned From Covid,” with politicians screaming about misinformation and public health officials lamenting their credibility issues.
But they made a mistake. They invited Michael Osterholm.
1/6
Osterholm made several points that public health officials don’t like to hear:
“The 3 most important words I own today are ‘I don’t know.’”
“We have far too often felt the need to have all the answers.”
Remember the last time a PH official said THAT? Yeah, me neither.
2/6
When he expressed concern in Jan 2021 that new variants might evade immunity and prolong the pandemic, he was “taken to the woodshed” by colleagues and canceled by the media who didn’t like his message (remember this is when Biden promised to “defeat” covid in 100 days).
3/6
Another example? Masks:
“Frankly some of the information that we gave to the public was not scientifically correct.” 😬
“…bc people wanted to hone in on an answer without having all the facts about what that answer meant.”
Oops.
4/6
How does “I don’t know” resonate in this room?
Ask @DrPanMD, who knows everything with such certainty he’s pushing #AB2098 to punish doctors for spreading “misinformation,”
…or CDPH’s @DrTomasAragon, who still pushes bogus studies and recc’s cloth masks on kids in 2022.
5/6
So Osterholm’s comments likely fell on deaf ears, like with masks.
It’s hard to adopt “I don’t know” when you’ve been lying about what you DO know for over 2 years…and are now trying to silence those who always knew.
They still have *all* the answers. And 0 credibility.
6/6
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
🧵In Fauci-esque fashion, San Diego's dying newspaper @sdut pens a swan song for the retiring public health officer who got everything wrong and harmed millions of San Diegans.
Let's take a final journey through yet another attempt to rewrite pandemic history...
"I do not regret any...orders or decisions that were made, not at all."
Like Fauci, "Dr" Wilma Wooten stands by everything she did, which included:
1. Stay at home orders. 2. Mask mandates. 3. School closures. 4. Gym closures. 5. Restaurant closures. 6. Vax mandates.
2/11
For those keeping score at home, she went 0/6 on these, without even getting into the generational harm caused to children, adults, minorities, the poor, businesses, civil liberties, and trust in public health.
Even the mainstream media has admitted this horrible failure.
We first have a Pulitzer Prize-winning author and "investigative reporter" deliberately cutting off the story before it mentions the age-adjusted mortality.
@latimes RT'd this.😬
How biased and incomplete were his decades of investigative reports?
The @ACLUVA has been bragging that due to their Virginia lawsuit settlement, parents demanding peers mask around their at-risk child is a reasonable accommodation.
But that's not what their settlement says...at all. In fact, it's almost the opposite. 🤔
Despite doing everything WRONG, I avoided the most highly-contagious aerosolized respiratory virus on Earth for 2+ years.
Bobby W says this profound moral failure REQUIRES a 25 tweet 🧵
1/25
With a Biomedical Science degree and having read Richard Preston's "The Hot Zone" (origins of ebola) one too many times in high school, I was always paranoid of pandemics.
I kept a hazmat suit, box of latex gloves and N95s in my house for years.
2/25
When the WHO declared a Global Pandemic in March 2020, I knew the enemy:
A mild respiratory virus of very little risk to the vast majority of kids and adults.
I threw away my gloves and hazmat suit (they were old and expired anyway) and donated my N95s to the hospital.
This is an interesting take from an expert who told a judge that "all masks" work when in fact she knows they don't. The only scientific uncertainty appears to be in her head.
And there is no "minimum standard" for masks. Any 'ol cloth or surgical mask will do: cdph.ca.gov/Programs/CID/D…
@CAPublicHealth doesn't even care if it fits, as with this child:
(amazingly, @CAPublicHealth DELETED this tweet after it appeared in the Plaintiff's exhibits)