🇺🇸 Mike Davis 🇺🇸 Profile picture
Aug 11, 2022 396 tweets >60 min read Read on X
Before Attorney General Merrick Garland's spin:

The President of the United States has both the constitutional (and statutory) power to declassify anything he wants.

If President Trump left the White House with classified records, they are declassified by his actions.

Period.
All former Presidents get a federally funded office.

Office of the Former President

With staff.

And security clearances.

And Secret Service protection.

And secure facilities (SCIFs) for classified records.

Even if Trump had classified records, they were protected.

Period
All Presidents take records when they leave.

They don't pack their own boxes.

National Archives takes the position that almost everything is a "presidential record."

The federal government over-classifies almost everything.
It's routine for any Office of the Former President to negotiate with National Archives.

They could've alerted Congress.

The Biden DOJ could've filed a civil lawsuit.

They could've sought a subpoena.

But unprecedented home raid?!

Trump's had these records for 18 months!
We've been all over this at @Article3Project -- and defending President Trump consistently:

article3project.org/media/on-the-a…
And here are @Article3Project's print media hits, defending President Trump, his top aides, and his loyal supporters from the Biden Justice Department's unprecedented political onslaught:

article3project.org/media/a3p-news/
AG Merrick Garland attempted to defend the indefensible in his political press conference.

He left more questions than answers.

He's a former federal judge and prosecutor.

He should be ashamed of himself for politicizing the Justice Department so dangerously.

He must resign.
Presidents have the inherent constitutional (and statutory) authority to declassify anything they want.

They don’t need to label it.

They don’t need to report it.

They don’t have to tell anyone.

They can do it through their actions.
As a matter of law, no President can be charged under the Espionage Act for “mishandling” classified records.

When President Trump had the records sent to Mar-a-Lago, they were declassified.

Former presidents don’t have this power.

But Trump did this as the President.
As discussed, the Office of Former President Trump—like every other former president’s federal office—is equipped and secure enough to handle these declassified records.

This is a routine dispute with bureaucrats at the National Archives whether these are presidential records.
If they’re presidential records, the National Archives “owns” them—but they’ll almost certainly stay with Trump in his presidential library.

That’s it.

That’s the bureaucratic dispute.

This isn’t some damn raid-able crime.

Attorney General Merrick Garland knows this.

IMPEACH
In 2012, President Obama secretly told the Russian president he'd have "more flexibility" to negotiate with Russia after the 2012 presidential election.

Clearly classified information.

Why not Espionage Act violation?

Because he's the President.

Period.reuters.com/article/us-nuc…
In 1987, the Supreme Court (again) made clear the President has constitutional power, as commander-in-chief, to classify and declassify.

Regardless of any statute passed by Congress.

Did AG Merrick Garland obtain an OLC opinion before ordering his illegal Trump raid?

Why not? Image
In 1987, the Supreme Court reaffirmed that the President doesn't have to get permission from Congress or bureaucrats to declassify.

The Office of the Former President is very secure.

Hillary Clinton-never a President-may have been foreign hacked.
 
Garland is a political hack
See 2 tweets above.

Same reporter got played in that same piece:
ICYMI, my @NewsweekOpinion piece from last Monday: newsweek.com/garland-wray-m…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with 🇺🇸 Mike Davis 🇺🇸

🇺🇸 Mike Davis 🇺🇸 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @mrddmia

Sep 9
Another Trump legal ally, Mike Davis, a former aide to Sen. Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, and to Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch, has promoted the concept that a second Trump administration should rely on an acting attorney general, not a Senate-confirmed attorney general, to act on Trump’s wishes more efficiently.

Trump, during his first term, said, “As you know I like ‘acting.’ It gives you great flexibility.”

Davis has also said he would “rain hell on Washington, D.C.,” if he became attorney general and would “bring indictments” against President Joe Biden and members of his family, former President Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton and George Soros, a billionaire and major Democratic donor.

Davis told NBC News that he does not expect he would fill the role of acting attorney general but that another Trump ally could. He suggested that a second-term Trump DOJ could convene grand juries and seek indictments within weeks of taking office, noting that private citizens could be preparing possible referrals that the DOJ could use against people whom Trump supporters accused of waging "lawfare" against the former president.

“These lawfare Democrats should lawyer up and be prepared for accountability on Jan. 20 at 12:01 p.m.,” Davis said.

Davis said that the department could seek an indictment of anyone for whom “there is probable cause that they participated in a criminal conspiracy,” making the case that the department under Attorney General Merrick Garland’s tenure took a “very aggressive, broad view with their lawfare” against Trump, his allies and supporters, like those charged in the Jan. 6 attack on the Capitol.

“These partisan Democrat plaintiffs, prosecutors, outside lawyers, court witnesses, judges and other lawfare activists in Albany, Atlanta, D.C., New York City, Palm Beach, and Phoenix should all lawyer up,” Davis said. “At a minimum, they are fact witnesses — if not co-conspirators — in this blatant criminal conspiracy.”

Davis said the indictment could be brought in federal court in Fort Pierce, Florida, where Trump could potentially find a more favorable jury pool, and because that is near where the FBI executed a search of Trump’s Mar-a-Lago estate.

nbcnews.com/investigations…
"There is an individual by the name of Mike Davis . . . ."

My response:

"Nobody is above the law."
Read 4 tweets
Aug 31
Dear “Conservatives”:

If you are even contemplating not voting for Trump, you are complicit in the destruction of America.

Fuck you and your “principles.”

You are too dumb and weak to consider yourself patriots.

You are the string orchestra on the Titanic.

Majestic drowning.
Trump actually delivered on reversing Roe.

Something the cuck Republicans failed to deliver for over 50 years.

Kamala will legalize post-birth abortions.

And make us all pay for it.

Get your heads out of your asses.

(Or keep grifting.

And pretend you’re pure.

Idiots.)
Read 6 tweets
Aug 26
Kamala sends violent Venezuelan gang members to Colorado.

Kamala sends 75-year-old praying Christians to prison.
Image
Image
Read 9 tweets
Aug 10
Kamala's strategy:

1. Fake crowds (free concerts and paid actors)

2. Fake polls (oversampling Democrats)

3. Fake voters (Illegal immigrants)
Biden and Kamala attempted to bankrupt Trump.

And throw him in prison for life.

Then simply toss him off the ballot.

Now, they're trying to destroy the Supreme Court that stopped them.

And they underfunded Trump's Secret Service protection--and told people to put a "bullseye" on him.

That all failed.

The next battle in Kamala's lawfare and election interference against Trump?

Rig and steal the election.

By illegal immigrants voting.

@Article3Project is gearing up now.

rumble.com/v5adi5d-davis-…
Read 13 tweets
Jul 29
🚨@Article3Project ACTION ALERT🚨

Tell Congress to Reject Extreme Biden-Harris Supreme Court Proposal

p2a.co/7qmi0rl
Read 12 tweets
Jul 2
This case is toast.

Bragg used evidence subject to presidential immunity.

Merchan must declare a mistrial.

Again, a jury’s finding of guilt isn’t a conviction.

A defendant doesn’t become a felon until the judge convicts him.

Trump isn’t a felon.

And he likely won’t ever be.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(