🇺🇸 Mike Davis 🇺🇸 Profile picture
Aug 11, 2022 396 tweets >60 min read Read on X
Before Attorney General Merrick Garland's spin:

The President of the United States has both the constitutional (and statutory) power to declassify anything he wants.

If President Trump left the White House with classified records, they are declassified by his actions.

Period.
All former Presidents get a federally funded office.

Office of the Former President

With staff.

And security clearances.

And Secret Service protection.

And secure facilities (SCIFs) for classified records.

Even if Trump had classified records, they were protected.

Period
All Presidents take records when they leave.

They don't pack their own boxes.

National Archives takes the position that almost everything is a "presidential record."

The federal government over-classifies almost everything.
It's routine for any Office of the Former President to negotiate with National Archives.

They could've alerted Congress.

The Biden DOJ could've filed a civil lawsuit.

They could've sought a subpoena.

But unprecedented home raid?!

Trump's had these records for 18 months!
We've been all over this at @Article3Project -- and defending President Trump consistently:

article3project.org/media/on-the-a…
And here are @Article3Project's print media hits, defending President Trump, his top aides, and his loyal supporters from the Biden Justice Department's unprecedented political onslaught:

article3project.org/media/a3p-news/
AG Merrick Garland attempted to defend the indefensible in his political press conference.

He left more questions than answers.

He's a former federal judge and prosecutor.

He should be ashamed of himself for politicizing the Justice Department so dangerously.

He must resign.
Presidents have the inherent constitutional (and statutory) authority to declassify anything they want.

They don’t need to label it.

They don’t need to report it.

They don’t have to tell anyone.

They can do it through their actions.
As a matter of law, no President can be charged under the Espionage Act for “mishandling” classified records.

When President Trump had the records sent to Mar-a-Lago, they were declassified.

Former presidents don’t have this power.

But Trump did this as the President.
As discussed, the Office of Former President Trump—like every other former president’s federal office—is equipped and secure enough to handle these declassified records.

This is a routine dispute with bureaucrats at the National Archives whether these are presidential records.
If they’re presidential records, the National Archives “owns” them—but they’ll almost certainly stay with Trump in his presidential library.

That’s it.

That’s the bureaucratic dispute.

This isn’t some damn raid-able crime.

Attorney General Merrick Garland knows this.

IMPEACH
In 2012, President Obama secretly told the Russian president he'd have "more flexibility" to negotiate with Russia after the 2012 presidential election.

Clearly classified information.

Why not Espionage Act violation?

Because he's the President.

Period.reuters.com/article/us-nuc…
In 1987, the Supreme Court (again) made clear the President has constitutional power, as commander-in-chief, to classify and declassify.

Regardless of any statute passed by Congress.

Did AG Merrick Garland obtain an OLC opinion before ordering his illegal Trump raid?

Why not? Image
In 1987, the Supreme Court reaffirmed that the President doesn't have to get permission from Congress or bureaucrats to declassify.

The Office of the Former President is very secure.

Hillary Clinton-never a President-may have been foreign hacked.
 
Garland is a political hack
See 2 tweets above.

Same reporter got played in that same piece:
ICYMI, my @NewsweekOpinion piece from last Monday: newsweek.com/garland-wray-m…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with 🇺🇸 Mike Davis 🇺🇸

🇺🇸 Mike Davis 🇺🇸 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @mrddmia

Dec 24, 2025
This is one of the most lawless and dangerous orders yet.

Biden DC U.S. District Judge Amir Hatem Mahdy Ali, the first Muslim and Arab DC judge, ordered the President's aides to ignore his executive order revoking a security clearance.

Judge Ali, who is still a foreign citizen, previously ordered the President could do not perform a national-security review of $2 billion in foreign aid.Image
Read 4 tweets
Nov 21, 2025
🚨BREAKING: Last night, US Attorney for the Eastern District of Virginia Lindsey Halligan revealed a ton of new evidence relating to Letitia James’s alleged mortgage fraud.

The exhibits are damning, and showed that she lied to the lending bank, the IRS, and her homeowners’ insurer.Image
Exhibit 4 in Halligan’s filing is Letitia James’s Affidavit of Occupancy, where she swore under oath that she would be using the Norfolk, Virginia property she bought as a second home.

This was false – she did not live in the property. Image
In her homeowner’s insurance application, James claimed that the Norfolk house was unoccupied five months out of the year.

This was false.

The house was occupied year-round by her niece. Image
Read 7 tweets
Nov 3, 2025
🚨

Trump U.S. Attorney Lindsey Halligan files public response to James Comey's motion to dismiss his indictment for vindictive prosecution.

Exhibit 13 includes bombshell, damning evidence of then-FBI Director Comey's handwritten note--on FBI director letterhead--evidencing Comey's knowledge of--and even participation in--the Russian collusion criminal conspiracy against Trump.Image
Exhibit 5 gets worse.

James Comey, from his burner gmail with his alias Reinhold Niebuhr, states:

to me

No need. At this point it would shouting into the wind. Some day they will figure it out. And as Jack and Ben point out, my decision will be one a president elect Clinton will be very grateful for (though that wasn't why I did it).Image
In Exhibit 7, in response to planting a New York Times election-eve hit piece against Trump, then-FBI Director James Comey tells FBI special government employee Daniel Richman:

"Well done my friend. Who knew this would. E so uh fun." Image
Read 12 tweets
Jul 13, 2025
There are a lot of X accounts recently expressing their outrage about accountability for Eipstein's exploitation of kids.

I'd take those X accounts more seriously if we ever heard them talk about the 300,000 missing migrant kids.

(Maybe it's the clicks?)
grassley.senate.gov/news/remarks/g…
Anyone who rapes kids deserves the death penalty.

Here's the problem with the Eipstein mess:

The FBI doesn't have the evidence many thought it did.

There are not tapes with powerful men raping kids.

There is not a list.

(Eipstein's rolodex is already public.)

And the file is largely unreleasable, for many reasons including:

1. Grand-jury materials

2. Court records under seal

3. Child pornography

4. Protection of victims

5. Unsubstantiated, even double- or triple-hearsay, bogus claims (like we saw during the Kavanaugh proceedings), which would permanently destroy the reputation of innocent people if released

Does anyone really believe Pam Bondi, Kash Patel, or Dan Bongino would cover up for the likes of Bill Clinton or Bill Gates--if they had that evidence?

The Trump Justice Department wanted to be fully transparent. But it can't, for the reasons above. This is a case of no good deed goes unpunished.

This is no doubt unsatisfying to many. But that's the hard truth.
Again, to those complaining about Pam:

"The Trump Justice Department wanted to be fully transparent. But it can't, for the reasons above. This is a case of no good deed goes unpunished."
Read 24 tweets
Mar 16, 2025
🚨

The President of the United States correctly designated Tren de Aragua (TdA), a vicious Venezuelan gang, as a foreign-terrorist organization.

The President correctly put these terrorists on planes to get them the hell out of our country.

Yet DC Obama Judge James Boasberg thinks he has the power to order the President to turn around the planes in mid-air and bring back these terrorists into America.

This is the most dangerous constitutional crisis imaginable.

I do not say this lightly:

The President has a constitutional duty, as the chief executive officer and commander-in-chief, to ignore Judge Boasberg's lawless and dangerous order.

The Supreme Court must use the emergency docket to immediately stay Judge Boasberg's order.

Next week, the House must impeach Judge Boasberg.

And defund his court.
Read 4 tweets
Mar 15, 2025
An activist Obama DC judge thinks he has the power to order the President to turn around planes deporting vicious Venezuelan Tren de Aragua gang members?

When will the Chief Justice and Justice Barrett end this extremely dangerous judicial sabotage of the presidency?
It’s time to ignore these illegal orders.

It’s time to impeach these lawless judges.

It’s time to defund these lawless courts.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(