Few points on #LalSinghChadha. Going by the reviews across the board, seems LSC is Aamir Khan’s biggest blunder. I will only restrict this to craft of film making and not to culture wars which requires separate thread. 1) Artistes should never ever entertain creative egos.
At 57 if you want to play a character with an age span of 15-30, and you have no one in the team including the director to say that this is a ridiculous idea, you must know you are trapped in your own ego and your understanding of greatness.
2) Film making is never a solo exercise. As a huge star, it is always tempting to work with yes men, so that you can do your own thing. That is death of any artiste. You must learn to handle dissent within your team, like you want dissent to be entertained in larger society.
3) Pretend you are challenging yourself when all you are doing is hearing your own voice. Have the courage to work outside your comfort zone. That is where real challenge lies
4) Not every great work of cinema can be adapted to Indian setting. Other than Shakespeare’s work which is universal in nature, it is very hard to adapt work that is set in western context. Forrest Gump does not lend itself to easy adaptation.
5) Forrest Gump is a clash between liberal and conservative America. India does not have similar politics. India’s concerns and India’s political spectrum is different. This was never going to be a film with any soul if ‘America’ was taken out of the picture.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
For the first time in what - 50 years (give or take 5), no one in Mumbai needs to appease/pay obeisance/be frightened by a Thackeray. That fear of ‘Thackeray’ is gone forever. Sena may or may not survive, Thackerays will not survive once that fear is gone.Choose successors wisely
Uddhav Thackeray forgot the most important lesson that a successor of Balasaheb Thackeray should have never forgotten- Jiske Paas Power Hai … Uska Wrong Bhi Right Ho Jaata Hai- Power in this case didn’t come from CM’s position but from firm control over Sainiks.
How did Bal Thackeray maintain his deathly grip over the city? Not via CM’s office or political machinery. His parallel govt didn’t depend on the govt of the day. His admirers will say - connection with Sainiks, his critics will say ‘extraordinary mafia like loyalty from cadre’
I think Lt Gen Puri did his very best to explain Agnipath. It will not be rolled back. This is a voluntary thing. People who feel this is not for them will have to find alternative careers. I understand it is hard. But this is a necessity for both students and Forces.
Youth will have to understand Government cannot and should not be a job generator. It simply is not feasible. I know Hindi heartland suffers due to lack of privatization and zero industrialization but this will force change. When people are desperate, state govts will change
Everyone has their own reason for why Agnipath was introduced.Some of it conspiracy theories,some of it true. My understanding is it is a tough pill to wean people off sarkari jobs.There is no painless way to do it.There is no easy way to do it. Desperation will force innovation
I was waiting for a hit job on Panchayat.And there it is. Left doesn’t disappoint. How can Left tolerate a show that talks about rural development,that shows women in control,that shows progressive village working towards improving their standards of living.They had to attack it
Left loves victimhood. Left loves to manufacture‘suffering women wilting under patriarchy’. And most important Left loves violence and expletives. Left loves thugs and crooks. That is why Anurag Kashyap’s cinema is progressive to them. And real slice of life cinema irks them.
Panchayat does not show any violence. Panchayat shows basic decency and good behavior that actually exists in real world. Panchayat shows people bonding with each other and not out to kill each other. Panchayat is everything that Left abhors.
Yasin Malik is no ordinary terrorist. He is no lunatic or trigger happy zealot. Yasin Malik is a genocidal maniac. What he did as a terrorist is known fairly well. What he did with the collusion of Civil Society after he ostensibly ‘laid down arms’ is much more important.
With the active help of Academia, Media, intellectual circuit, terrorist Yasin Malik spun a web of deceit and fraud. Stalwarts of civil society, many of whom are still active in public life, some have conveniently changed opinion since 2014, helped Yasin Malik become ‘Gandhian’
Sonia Gandhi hosted Yasin Malik, Journalist Prem Shankar Jha hosted him in his house, he became a coveted guest at conclaves, media did sympathetic profiles on him. We were told Yasin Malik’s favorite food and favorite dish and favorite holiday destination.
LG @manojsinha_ entire speech in Sheikhpura camp.He answers most Q’s 1)Why he came after a delay. He intended to come the first day. He explains it clearly. 2) compensation amount and issues around it and how he is working around what the policy is
3) LG @manojsinha_ also says something that no Governor probably has said in public before.Not just the terrorists, their enablers too will have to face the law of the land. He said he was cognizant about the dangers 4) He is available for talks anytime to resolve all issues.
PM package employees have indicated in this video that they are willing to meet LG and discuss further. Hopefully there will be a resolution soon. Praying for the safety of all employees and their families and everyone who is serving in Kashmir valley.
I always say that India is divided into two kinds of people. Those who believe India is an unbroken civilization of 5000 years, and those who think India was ‘born’ in 1947. Rahul Gandhi belongs to the latter group which is not a surprise. Look at the company he keeps.
Why is Sonia Congress different and divisive than say previous versions of Congress? It is not that Congress hasn’t lost elections before. Indira lost elections, Rajiv lost elections. But this tag of ‘anti-national’ stuck only to Sonia Congress? It is easy to guess why.