ib Profile picture
Aug 12, 2022 20 tweets 10 min read Read on X
No divorces, no kids, no second marriages here.
allendowney.com/blog/2020/10/2…

Just "How many women, born in this decade, have ever married by this age?" — asked from 1940 to 2020.

Over 80 years there's a LOT of change in 20, 25, and 30 year olds' marriage prospects:
When the age of marriage first began to increase, men were still largely limited to marrying within the same age cohort, and largely still prepared to marry in their youth, despite needing to spend some more time and effort trying to find a wife.
But, while the average age of marriage for women to be married rose from 20 to merely 22 in 1980, the trajectory set in motion for women born from 1980 onwards is visibly different above. What happened?

Well, consider 2002 vs. 2018:
What was hard-hitting Harvard Business Review commentary in 2002 for late 70s early 80s birth cohort women in their 20s...was passé and satirized for 20 something women in 2018 from the late 80s early 90s cohort

The educational and professional landscape had greatly changed:
And what's happened to men?
Well.

'In 1960, 97% of men between...25 and 54, 86% of men 20+, had jobs.

Today, 1/9 men between 25 and 54, 1/5 from 20+ to retirement age aren't working - 3 times more than in 1960.'

milkenreview.org/articles/the-m…
Economists like to make lots of charts and mathematical models to explain why, but here's what I think we can be reasonable sure happened:

- Outsourcing
- Immigration
- Automation

- The Weakened Signal(?!)

dalrock.wordpress.com/2019/09/09/the…
On top of everything we've done to prioritize womens' education over mens' from pre-k to college, to totally feminize everything from the boardroom to the newsroom, and to outsource, automate, and import foreign competition for working men's jobs...the age of marriage kept rising
Recall our earlier chart about the age of marriage.

As the marriage age increased, alongside increased education and labor participation for women, with fewer males in college or in professional roles, social mores around promiscuity changed, too 🫤

Did men's feelings?
Divorces between 21 year olds in 1964 and divorces between 60 year olds in 2010 aren't happy, but...

...We can consider them a LOT less socially deleterious than divorces of people in their mid 30s-50s with kids, given the insane state of American family courts
What's likely happened to the 80s->90s cohort?

They were the most exposed to the divorces of parents, most encouraged to delay marriage in pursuit of education/careers, most encouraged to 'play the field' sexually, and most encouraged to look askance at traditional values.
How do young (and not so young) men and women evaluate each other? Not equivalently.

Our culture is very good at understanding the reasons young (and not so young) women might look askance at men in their age cohort as marital prospects.
It doesn't really think about this when it comes to men.

In fact, Social Conservatives are *especially* bad at it.

@WilliamJBennett (whom I believe is still alive: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_B…) wrote this in 2011:

cnn.com/2011/10/04/opi…

Lots of familiar observations here.
What's to blame?

Men of course. Those boys - not big strong men, responsible family men like him - are ignoring a full life of WORK, MARRIAGE, and RELIGION and leaving these poor young women alone while they sadly toil at university and the office for MEN who don't even try!
If anything the Social Conservatives of yesteryear sound much like n-th wave of today Feminists talking about incels.

Why are there so many videogame obsessed, basement dwelling, NEETS? Are they *choosing* this over lots and lots of willing women who want to get married? Hmm.
dalrock.wordpress.com/2019/09/09/the…

"What should surprise us is not that men are slowly responding to the radical changes brought about by our still ongoing sexual revolution. What should surprise us is how many young men still focus their youth preparing for a role our society despises."
Let's take another look at this chart.
allendowney.com/blog/2020/10/2…

The function the author uses has an optimistic projection jump for the 90s cohort. What if that doesn't happen?

By my guesstimate, when 90s cohort women are in their 40s, only about 35% will have married.
Why do I think this? Consider women at 28 years old.

Born in the 1940s, 87% would have married once.

In the 1950s, 80%

in the 60s, 70%

in the 70s, 63%

in the 80s, 55%

...

in the 90s, 31%
It's also the case that men in a position to marry from their early 20s to early 30s, the same 90s cohort of men *may well consider 2000s cohort women*.

I suspect there are a few cases:

1. Men who had no issue getting laid
2. Men who did, but matured/improved
3. Religious men
I would wager that for reasons ranging from divorce risk avoidance, to personal fussiness, resentment, relative sexual inexperience, etc. 90s cohort Men in a 'buyer's market' position wrt. marriage as 90s cohort women age will often opt for the lower end/2000s women

but also bc:
pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2014…

2014. It's worsened since.

The picture of a married mom and dad raising their kids together is going to be a rare, exceptional thing within your lifetime.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with ib

ib Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Indian_Bronson

May 3
Two feasible pro-civilizational efforts:

1. Get more low density low cost housing to talented young people whose labor travels by internet, so they reproduce

2. Get laboring talented young people to someplace with low density low cost housing and internet, so they reproduce
I have previously offered my thoughts on how we should conceive of, and measure the success of, social and institutional alternatives to the mainstream culture and educational regimes: Image
Here is another schematic, which I hope captures what I am talking about in the concept above. You may notice these ideas actually link up in a kind of 'grand cycle', where one generation's production generatively produces another generation. We may call this "reproduction": Image
Read 4 tweets
Apr 3
Buckle up.
Genes. Physiology. Inheritance.
Who we are is What we are.
Read 25 tweets
Mar 8
Biden will win.

We'll hear coping just like after the "red wave" failed in 2022 or the "stop the steal" coping in 2020 - MAGA has its head in the sand about THREE things:

1. Demographic Shifts (among *Whites*)
2. Abortion
3. Recency Bias

Let's look at each of these:
1.
Trump won in 2016 with tiny margins of victory in Michigina, Wisconsin, and Pennsylvania - among non-college educated (working but often middle class) exurban whites: a lot of people who were union workers or would have been non-voters showed up.

But did Trump 'win whites'?
Trump actually won fewer (slightly; 1% less) white voters than Mitt Romney got in 2012.

Did you know that? Among whom do you think Trump did worse on net? It's important he picked up voters in the right electoral college *shape* to win, but also that he did overall lose whites.
Read 22 tweets
Feb 23
Doesn’t matter

They could openly admit firing only white people in the name of “retention equity”

The only way it ever stops is if white people politically organize to pursue their material self-interest *as* white people, which is literal white nationalism, which you’d reject
What do all of these new prominent right wingers expect? Why is anyone surprised about this? What do they think opposition to the Civil Rights Act was about? Why do they think the Southern states fought integration, or why middle America opposed forced bussing? Etc, etc, etc.
Explicit penalization for being white is routine in America.

If you want that to stop, @libsoftiktok , then you have to commit to white nationalism, you have to commit to the political pursuit of white self-interest.

It's that simple. Do you? Will you?

bloomberg.com/news/articles/…
Read 4 tweets
Feb 16
The Tucker Carlson in Russia critiques are true:
Yes, it's just Moscow center
Yes, the groceries are expensive
Yes, Putin killed Navalny

But Tucker has NEVER seen such a modern city, with SO many white people, where public culture is *assertively* hetero and nominally Christian
Tucker is a child of the Cold War; this is shocking to him.
All the dismissals he grew up with about Russia as Godless, as poor, as corrupt - these were results of the *Communists* whose spiritual descendants Tucker feels he battles daily in America:
I was in Kiev (and Nikolaev) in November of 2021, just before the war. I'd lived for a decade before in NYC, and I experienced what I'm sure Tucker is going through; amazement at *large* modern city defined by white people yet with very little 'gayness':
Read 6 tweets
Feb 6
All Bud Light needed to do was apologize.

But they wouldn't, and won't, as that would mean at least implicitly repudiating transgenderism by accepting their (former) customers' moral framework as the right one, which says transgenderism is wrong. So they try this stuff: Image
Shane Gillis and Donald Trump endorse transgenderism.

If Bud Light partnered with someone who said "I want to gas Jews because I'm a Nazi", and Bud Light never actually apologized but said stuff like 'Third, to all our valued consumers, we hear you.' in a 'move on statement',
We would understand Bud Light did not view being a Nazi who wants to gas Jews as a bad thing in itself, merely unpopular with customers, and didn't accept it had morally transgressed. We'd understand Shane Gillis and Trump's endorsement of Bud Light as endorsement of Nazism.
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(