1. Growth in revenue from operations - Q1FY23 vs Q1FY22 : ~115%
2. Growth in export formulations - Q1FY23 vs Q1FY22 : ~400%
3. Growth in domestic formulations - Q1FY23 vs Q1FY22 : ~ -56%
4. Cost of materials was much higher in the corresponding last quarter because of the write off of covid inventory which is why there is a significant difference in COGS
Revlimid : 1. Contributed a major share to revenue in Q1FY23 2. Revenue share is expected to taper off
in Q2&Q3 FY23 3. Sales from Revlimid are expected to recover in Q4 FY23 and Q1FY24 4. The reason for seasonality is due to limited amount of this product’s supply as per the settlement with Celgene 5. When supplies are sent , manufacturing margins are booked and subsequently
the profit share is booked when Teva sells the product. 6. In subsequent quarters when Natco is unable to supply Revlimid, the sales drop 7. When Natco supplies new batches of Revlimid in Q4 and Q1 then most of the manufacturing margin and profit share is booked in
those respective quarters and subsequently when only a little of the product is left to be supplied in Q2 and Q3 the revenues taper off 8. Management expects to gain market share for revlimid going ahead for few quarters
1. If we remove Lenalidomide (Revlimid), the revenue from other products in the US have been stable according to the management.
2. Management acknowledges that the US market is a tough business for generics
3. Regarding Copaxone - Volumes have dropped, as the product
administration has moved to Oral dosage. Yet the management expects it do well for whatever size is left
Natco is unable able to meet PAT guidance because : 1. Domestic business is not doing well.Natco is looking at an acquisition in the domestic business to gain market share.
2. According to the management, the market has become extremely competitive and no one is willing to let go of market share.
3. Mr Rajeev says that the only way to grow in the domestic region is to either acquire market share,
buy an asset or launch complex products that are new.
A good portion of the surplus is used for R&D : 1. With the purpose of developing ‘jackpot’ products to sustain the pipeline in the coming decade
2. Management aims to develop ‘hard to do generics’ and supply exhibit batches
3. The focus of R&D is on complex products like Peptides, Oligopeptides, and Oncology products which are require clinical trials on patients
CnD division in the domestic market : 1. The business is not growing , but witnesses stable revenues
Agrochemicals : 1. Is a miniscule part of the business. 2. Natco is looking at acquisitions in this space as well. Management expects the business to be 10-15% of the business
3. Natco is sued on the product manufacturing process patent of CTPR.
4. As per management comments, the patent on the product goes off on 13th August 2022
5. But the patent on the manufacturing process of CTPR expires on December 2025
6. The court has allocated third party
experts to study the case and determine if Natco has infringed the process patent
7. Until then the product launch has been halted
Natco’s competitor AstraZeneca in the Oncology has done well in the domestic market but management claims the model is different than theirs
Conclusion
1. Although Natco has seen significant growth in revenues in Q1FY23, the question is whether it will be able to maintain this growth rate for a longer term.
2. Natco’s growth in revenues have been driven solely by Revlimid which makes the future highly uncertain
with respect to how the product sales pans out in the future.
2. Coupled with the fact that products excluding Revlimid have witnessed flat sales in the US.
3. The domestic business is already witnessing a lot of competition and has unsurprisingly witnessed
degrowth in formulation revenues
4. Management acknowledged the importance of being able to launch ‘Jackpot Products’ as a result of which, the company has started investing heavily in R&D.
5. Overall the business’ success is dependent on a lot of external factors and is highly risky.
Register to model portfolio to get detailed analysis on various businesses
1. Sales volume of 23.33 million square meters in Q1 FY2023. In Q1 consolidated revenue from operation increased by 80% on a year-to-year to Rs.1008 Crores from Rs.562 Crores in Q1 FY2022 because
of a lower base.
2. EBITDA margin for this quarter stood at 15.23% as compared to 14.32% in the corresponding quarter of the previous year.
3. Revenue from the bathware segment grew by 93% from Rs.37 Crores to Rs.71 Crores in Q1. Revenue from the plywood segment grew by 279%
from Rs.5 Crores to Rs.20 Crores in Q1.
4. In the Q1 the north prices for gas were around Rs.52, south was about Rs.60 and west was about Rs.67. Prices are very fluctuating right now. Gas is around 38% of company’s cost.
Operational and Financial Highlights 1. Mayur Uniquoters Ltd being a market leader in the synthetic leather industry and an organised player has been able to leverage the emerging opportunity
and deliver exemplary performance in the past year both in national and international markets.
2. The company has achieved revenue from operations on a standalone basis amounting to Rs 200.93 crores and PBT Rs 35.95 crores and PAT Rs 28.64 crores during the quarter which has
increased by 37%, 41% and 47% respectively from the last quarter.
3. Revenue from operations on a consolidated basis is Rs 200.44 crores and PBT is Rs 33.89 crores and PAT Rs 27.1 crores which has increased by 24%, 4% and 9% respectively from the last quarter.
1. Volume and value grew 69% and 83% y-o-y respectively, led by building materials segment. Revenue grew 83% to 604cr in Q1 2023 compared to 331cr in Q1 2022. Volume grew by 69% to 31215 MT.
PAT declined to 16cr in Q1 2023 from 18cr in Q1 2022
2. EBITDA was 44cr indicating a growth of 6%. Margins was 7.3%, which dropped from 15-17% levels Margins to remain under pressure in Q2. Margin guidance for December quarter is around 13-15%. Margin Drop was because of
inventory losses and channel destocking impacting operating leverage
3. Demand for agri in Q1 was weak while for SWR and Plumbing was resilient. Softening PVC prices resulted in a muted sentiment across value chain causing destocking among channel partners.
Operational highlights: 1. Total revenue of 89.61 cr, with EBITDA of 19.90 cr. EBITDA margin stood at 21.3%. Company reported PAT of 10.70 cr with 11.94% margins.
2. Sold 0.405 million square feet in area with 533 units sold.
3. Values of sales stood at INR 234.8 cr and total collection was INR 110.6 cr.
4. Received OC for two projects in Taloja with delivery of 390 units.
5. Management guided for a CAGR of 45% to 50% on sales and revenue figures.
6. In the next three years, management plans to deliver 1,000 to 1,200 units per year from existing inventory and ongoing projects.