Paul Poast Profile picture
Aug 13 25 tweets 6 min read
Why was it a problem that Trump had top secret nuclear documents in his home (besides, of course, being completely illegal)?

Because it directly undermined a key pillar of US foreign policy since 1945: nonproliferation.

[THREAD]
You really can't understand US foreign policy since 1945 if you don't consider two key facts:

(1) That the United States first developed the atomic bomb in 1945 (through the Manhattan Project)
(2) The United States is the only country to have ever used the atomic bomb in war.
Since that time, US foreign policy has gone through three phases, all focused on stopping the spread of nuclear technology:

- Phase 1: PRESERVING
- Phase 2: PREVENTING
- Phase 3: PROHIBITING
Phase 1: PRESERVING

Up to 1949, the United States held a nuclear monopoly: it was the only country with a nuclear weapon.
A key part of US policy during that time was to maintain that monopoly (which really started during World War II).
academic.oup.com/ahr/article-ab…
A good example of that effort was the "Baruch Plan", whereby the United States, through the UN, would proposed to assist other countries in developing nuclear energy (but not weapons).

onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.111…
But the US monopoly was broken in 1949, when the Soviets tested their first nuclear weapon.
PHASE 2: PREVENTING

After the Soviets broke the US monopoly, the focus of US policy shifted to controlling the spread of nuclear technology.
This meant that nuclear proliferation could happen, but it had to happen on US terms.

For instance, the US would prevent some allies from acquiring the bomb...

amazon.com/Atomic-Assuran…
...while acquiescing to a few others actually gaining it.

nsarchive.gwu.edu/briefing-book/…
Though President Eisenhower called for more international legal restrictions on the acquisition and development of the nuclear weapons...
...such as his "Atoms for Peace" program...

eisenhowerlibrary.gov/research/onlin…
...those efforts wouldn't start in earnest until after the "nuclear war near-miss" that was the Cuban Missile Crisis of 1962.
PHASE 3: PROHIBITING

Starting in the 1960s, the focus was on creating and enforcing international legal restrictions on the spread of nuclear technology.
For example, US-Soviet cooperation led to the creation of the Nuclear Non-proliferation Treaty in 1968.
journals.uchicago.edu/doi/abs/10.108…
After that, a pillar of the US-led "rules-based order" was enforcing that legal prohibition on the development of nuclear weapons.
unidir.org/commentary/int…
This entailed stopping other countries from acquiring the bomb -- calling them "outlaw" countries or "rogue states" or just "evil".
nytimes.com/video/us/polit…
It also meant negotiating arms control treaties with existing nuclear powers...
amazon.com/dp/B094DRDCWD/…
...and, such as during the 1990s, working with Russia to remove nuclear weapons from other countries.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Budapest_…
Okay, so why is this relevant to Trump and the classified documents he possessed?
washingtonpost.com/national-secur…
It's widely recognized that the US tends to "overclassify" documentation regarding nuclear weapons.
But overclassification makes sense if one recognizes that US post-1945 foreign policy is focused on stopping the spread of nuclear weapons technology.
The concern is that such documents could be used to help another state acquire the bomb. After all, it's not unusual for people to try to sell US nuclear secrets.

bbc.com/news/world-us-…
In short, Trump possessing those documents was a problem because they directly threatened a key component of US foreign policy since 1945.

Oh, and because mishandling classified info -- regardless of the content -- is illegal.

[END]

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Paul Poast

Paul Poast Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @ProfPaulPoast

Aug 6
The 🇺🇦-🇷🇺 War compels scholars to revisit and rethink early 1990s claims that ending the Cold War "transformed" international politics.

At the top of that list? John Ikenberry's "new Liberal Order".

[THREAD]
When folks think of the work of Ikenberry, they typically think of his 2001 book "After Victory"
It is an important book. It lays out the different ways in which states can "order" international politics.
Read 23 tweets
Jul 30
The "Security Dilemma" does NOT help us understand the War in Ukraine.

But the War in Ukraine does help us understand the "Security Dilemma".

[THREAD]
This past week, @stephenWalt wrote a @ForeignPolicy piece on the "security dilemma", its relevance to contemporary events, and its apparent lack of influence in policy.

foreignpolicy.com/2022/07/26/mis…
That piece prompted a BUNCH of responses from international relations scholars (such as by @SevaUT below), especially over Walt's use of the term "preventive war" when describing how the "security dilemma" relates to Russia's invasion.

Read 24 tweets
Jul 26
Pinker's proposal is based on three assumptions:

1) Putin's invasion was about NATO nukes.

2) Nukes haven't deterred.

3) Giving Putin a "win" is costless

All three are flawed. A short 🧵.
Assumption 1: Invasion about NATO nukes (or even about NATO)

Why it's wrong: 3 reasons

First, 🇷🇺-🇺🇦 tensions pre-date NATO post-Cold War expansion. For example, John Mearsheimer argued back in 1993(!) that Ukraine shouldn't give up nukes on its territory
foreignaffairs.com/articles/ukrai…
Second, Putin's aims are imperial expansion. For example, @e_sarotte has pointed out a number of times that the timing of the invasion corresponds with the 30th anniversary of the USSR collapse (which Putin considered the 20th century's "biggest tragedy).
ft.com/content/742f15…
Read 14 tweets
Jul 23
Let's talk about the most successful global scale cooperation in history: the Montreal Protocol.

What was it?

How did it come about?

Can its success be duplicated?

[THREAD]
The Protocol is having a moment right now, thanks to this tweet.
That induced a HOST of responses, such as this one...

Read 35 tweets
Jul 16
Terrific question! Here are my top-5 "Once Great, now Not" European Countries!

[THREAD]
When making this list, a few ground rules.

First, I when say "Once Great" I mean "once a great power". These can still be "great" places to visit/live (IF they still exist)
Second, I avoided snarky selections. So 🇫🇷 isn't on it 😉
Read 33 tweets
Jul 9
What is meant by "Second Image Reversed"? 🤔

Let's have Boris Johnson illustrate it for us.😬

[THREAD]
Of course, I'm referring to Johnson's resignation as Prime Minister.

The immediate cause of Johnson's resignation is a mass exodus of ministers from his government.

news.sky.com/story/boris-jo…
Read 28 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(