Sunday update (a little later, sorry was travelling). There seem to be two different narratives emerging--Russians pushing forward a little in the Donbas/Donetsk, Ukrainians setting up for a wasting campaign against the Russians in Kherson.
In the Donbas area the Russians over the last week have claimed to have moved forward towards Bakhmut and Siversk, and many pro-Russian outlets are making much of these claims. The truth seems that they have pushed a few kilometres forward in areas, but not as much as claimed.
This is quite a useful @TheStudyofWar interactive map of today. The yellow is what the Russians are claiming, the broken red line is where the ISW calculates where they are. You can explore the map here. storymaps.arcgis.com/stories/36a7f6…
Same in the Donetsk. Small Russian advances registered. storymaps.arcgis.com/stories/36a7f6…
What improvement the Russians are gaining from this seems to be simply a smaller version of what they did earlier during the very heavy phase of the Battle of the Donbas. Slow, incremental advances, no breakout, no exploitation, no ability to surround Ukr forces.
Just pound away directly in front and advance into a cleared out area. However, the Russians seem able to do this now on a considerably smaller scale than in May-June and early July. This limited area of advance seems to be the result of successful Ukrainian logistics attacks.
There was an important article by @IAPonomarenko about continuing Ukrainian difficulties in dealing with massed artillery fire (Ukr must improve counterbattery fire). It had the first Ukr estimates of how Russian fire has overall been reduced in the east, and its signifant...
Overall Russian ranged fired down by 50%-66% (half to two thirds). From 10-15k Russians shells fired a day to 5-6K. Shows just how important controlling logistics is in war. This reduction could never be achieved by fighting direct engagement battles.
So in the east the Russians are able to push forward in increasingly smaller areas. They can still generate considerable firepower in the smaller areas, but its hard to see this leading to any major breakout.
In the Kherson region, the Ukrainians have not pushed forward much either, though there are indications of some advance in the far northwest.
However what they have continued to do, is hammer the logistics routes crossing the Dnieper River. As of Now Ukraine is claiming that they have taken both the major crossings at Nova Kakhovka and Kherson out of action (at least for heavy supplies). bbc.co.uk/news/world-eur…
If this is true (stress on if) this matters far more than any halting Russian advance in east. I know Ive been banging on about it for weeks, but it looks like this was the exact Ukr plan. Scare the Russians into reinforcing the west bank of the Dnieper.
And once they have, the Ukr cut the logistics links so the larger force cant be supplied. If they can carry out this logistics cuts the Russian troops will either have to be pulled out (or many will) or they will be abandoned because they cant be supplied.
Overall this way of fighting is generally why I'm positive about Ukr prospects. The two sides are intellectually fighting very differently. The Russians are plodding, battle-centric, have difficulties adjusting and cant operate their complex systems well (see air and sea power)
The Ukr are fighting more well-thought out campaigns, show the ability to adjust, and are actually showing the ability to operate different complex systems (NATO systems) that they have almost no exposure too before Feb 24.
In many ways that is summarized in the most sensational development of the week, the Ukr attack on Saki Airfield in Crimea. However they did it, it shows the capacity to plan and execute of a very high order. Rus forces, otoh, seemed unprepared.
What the Ukrainians are doing is posing a series of different and difficult challenges to the Rus Army. The Russians seem able to pose one major one (massed firepower). If the Ukr can learn to contend with that (and they should if provided more aid), what will the Russians do?

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Phillips P. OBrien

Phillips P. OBrien Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @PhillipsPOBrien

Aug 16
Indications of another Ukrainian attack on a Russian facility in Crimea. In this case an ammunition depot
Pretty obvious position for a large, open air ammo dump for a Russian Army at peace. Right at a transport node in Northern Crimea. Once again, the Russians seem to be leaving obvious targets vulnerable to attack. liveuamap.com/en/2022/16-aug… Image
Read 5 tweets
Aug 12
A really interesting analysis by @IAPonomarenko about how Ukraine is trying to cope with Russian artillery strength and what it needs to do it better. Worth a close read as there are many important points.
Throughout the story the theme is that Ukraine must improve its counter battery capabilities (hitting Russian artillery once it fires and reveals itself) to try and counter Russian numerical superiority in guns
HIMARS and other ranged attacks have made a significant difference in Russian artillery capabilities, but the Russians can still mass artillery in certain areas. As for the state of the artillery war, for the first time I saw hard estimates from Ukr.
Read 10 tweets
Aug 11
Some reports of explosions in Belarus military facilities. Wouldn’t be surprised if Ukraine is putting pressure on a Lukashenko, or if Belarussians are doing it themselves.
Wouldn’t be surprised if Ukraine was putting pressure on Lukashenko to show how weak his position is. They don’t believe he can afford to enter the war (he can’t) but wonder if he might send volunteers . news360.es/ukraine-rules-…
And guess what, if Lukashenko comes under pressure, who saves him? Putin has his whole army basically in Ukraine. Will the Belarus people fight for Lukashenko? Might actually be time for Ukraine to apply a little pressure.
Read 5 tweets
Aug 11
A really interesting thread with the first satellite pictures from Russian air base on Crimea, which was (now clearly shown) heavily damaged with the loss of a great deal of expensive equipment, including base logistics.
The thread also starts discussing what kind of attack it was, and tbh, it’s still not clear. I’ve seen a number of options presented, all of which have some supporting evidence. Ukr Spec Forces, UAVs, long range rockets (even ATACMS), homegrown Ukr missiles…
The Ukrainians aren’t saying, and tbh, they shouldn’t. The gravity of this attack can’t be underestimated, and if the Russians don’t even know how it was launched, it’s impact will be magnified.
Read 9 tweets
Aug 9
Russo-Ukraine War (will try to stick to this name now) update from the Pentagon briefing yesterday--which might be termed escalatory briefing. Here is the whole text. There is lots on China-Taiwan as well btw. defense.gov/News/Transcrip…
One of the big changes since the start of the war is that the USDOD is willing to put things on the record with very senior officials. Its no longer using anonymity to provide some protection. IOW, they are feeling increasingly confident of their analysis.
Yesterday's briefing was by Dr Colin Kahl, Undersecretary of Defense for Policy (basically number 3 in the Pentagon on the civilian side. So this info/analysis comes from the top. defense.gov/About/Biograph…
Read 16 tweets
Aug 8
A thread, primarily for those in Ukraine whose opinion I would really value. Its about what we should call this war we are in. Lots of people use different names, Russian Invasion of Ukraine, Ukraine-Russian War, Putin's war, etc.
At some point we will inevitably settle on one name (though that can change over time, see Great War to First World War). I was thinking from now on of just using the name: The Ukraine War. My thinking was as follows.
1. This war is ultimately about the future of Ukraine, it was an attempt by Putin's Russia to conquer and erase the country politically.
Read 9 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(