A hierarchy of alienness: Pictures of animals from least to most related to you.

Least-related animal: Sponges. You and sponges are both animals. That's basically all you've got in common.
You and comb jellies are both eumetazoans: "later animals").
You and jellyfish are both planulozoans: animals with serotonin, a chemical that carries messages between nerve cells in the brain.
You and xenacoelomorphs are both bilaterians: animals with bilateral symmetry as an embryo.
You and mollusks are both nephrozoans: animals with specialized excretory organs, like kidneys.
You and starfish are both deuterostomes: "second mouth," animals characterized by their anus forming before their mouth during embryonic development.

Kinda weird to think you're more closely related to a starfish than an octopus or a butterfly, isn't it?
You and lancelets are both chordates: animals having a notochord at some stage of their development.
You and sea squirts are both olfactores: "smellers."

Again, isn't it weird that you're more related to THIS than to any animal shown above?
You and hagfish are both vertebrates.
You and sharks are both gnathostomes: jawed animals.
You and the bony fishes (i.e., most fishes) are both euteleostomes: bony vertebrates.
You and coelacanths are both sarcopterygians: "fleshy fins," the things that would become your limbs.
You and lungfish are both rhipidistians: "small bellows." In other words, you both have lungs.
You and amphibians are both tetrapods: "four foot."
You and reptiles and birds are all amniotes: animals whose embryos are suspended in fluid-filled sacs.

Note: I've chosen to represent this group with a snake, but note that all amniotes including snakes are still tetrapods (four-foots).
You and the platypus are both mammals: animals whose mothers feed their young milk.
You and opossums are both therians ("wild beasts"): mammals that give birth to live young without a shelled egg.
You and armadillos are both eutherians ("true beasts"): placental mammals, where the fetus is carried in the uterus of its mother to a relatively late stage of development.
You and rhinoceroses are both boreoeutherians ("true beasts of the north"): mammals where the males have scrotums.
You and rabbits are both euarchontoglires, which hilariously translates to: "True rulers and dormice."

This superorder includes both glires ("dormice," rabbits and rodents) and euarchons ("true rulers," the somewhat arrogant name for the group that includes humans).
You and treeshrews are both members of grandorder Euarchonta: "true rulers."
You and colugos are both primatomorpha: "shaped like the noble ones."
You and lemurs are both primates: the "noble ones," the "excellent" or "highest" animals.

Primates are distinguished by large brains, good eyes with color vision, a shoulder girdle allowing a large degree of movement in the shoulder joint, and dextrous hands.
You and tarsiers are both haplorhines: "simple-nosed" primates.
You and New World monkeys (like spider monkeys) are both simians: "snub-nosed," the apelike animals.
You and mandrills are both catarrhines ("flat nose"): Old World monkeys.

Catarrhines lack prehensile tails, have flat fingernails and toenails, a tubular ectotympanic (ear bone), and eight premolars.
You and gibbons are both apes: "Hominoidea," "resembling man."
You and orangutans are both hominids: "Manlike," great apes.
You and gorillas, like the late great Harambe, are both African hominids.
You and chimpanzees are both members of the tribe Hominini: "the tribe of man."

But chimpanzees and bonobos are both part of the genus Pan (named for the Greek god of nature and wilderness), while humans are part of the genus Homo ("man"). They are our closest living relatives.
This has been your tour of your extended family.

From your most distant cousin, the sponge, to your closest living non-human relative, the chimpanzee.
As an aside: Note that sea squirts are chordates, because their larva have a notochord.

The lancelet, pictured before the sea squirt, is also not a vertebrate, and is actually less related to us than the sea squirt.
I know the lancelet looks like a fish, but they're not really a fish, just "fish-like."

If you watch a video you'll get a sense of how distantly related they are. In motion, it looks more like a worm than a fish:
I got a question about what this means for other mammals.

The non-Boreoeutheria mammalian superorders are Afrotheria ("wild beasts," elephants & aardvarks) and Xenarthra ("strange joints," armadillos and sloths).

In both cases, the males' testicles are always fully internal.
Note: Hagfish are vertebrates (subphylum Vertebrata), BUT they don't actually have a spine. Just rudimentary vertebrae.

Taxonomists have even debated whether hagfish should in fact be classed as vertebrates, but current consensus says they are.
Since posting, I have been informed that placing a rabbit on its back is called "trancing" them: induces them to lie still and feign death.

It's a cute photo, but you it's not something you should usually do to them, because it may scare them and make them injure themselves.
I ended the list too soon. Our closest living relative is: Ourselves.

You and all humans are members of the genus Homo ("man's sort," "mankind").

Humans are the sole extant species in our genus. Being one species means we can breed together & the resulting offspring are fertile
Question from @gomes_ha: Where do insects branch off?

The answer is: the octopus entry. That entry is doing a lot of work, because the clade Nephrozoa is huge & diverse.

Insects, like octopuses & us, are nephrozoans.
Unlike us, but like octopuses, insects are not deuterostomes.
Mollusks (octopuses), arthropods (butterflies), and annelids (earthworms) are all protostomes: "first mouth."

Their mouth is derived from the embryonic blastopore.

In contrast, in us deuterostomes ("second mouth") the blastopore becomes our anus in embryonic development.
Every animal on the list including and after the starfish is a deuterostome.

You're about as closely related to a butterfly as you are to an octopus or an earthworm.
But butterflies, earthworms, and octopuses are all more closely related to each other than they are to you.
Another topic: Birds & reptiles.

Traditional taxonomy considered reptiles (Reptilia) and birds (Aves) to be separate classes of amniotes, alongside Mammalia.

Modern taxonomy treats both birds & reptiles as part of a common clade, Sauria.
Clade Sauria is divided into two big groups:

1) Archelosaurians: Birds, crocodilians and turtles
Within the archelosaurians, birds and crocodilians together form the archosaurs: "ruling lizards."

Crocodilians are birds' closest living relatives, and vice versa.

A crocodile is actually more closely related to a sparrow than to a turtle, snake or lizard!
Besides archelosaurians, the other big group of clade Sauria is:

2) Lepidosaurians: Snakes, lizards (iguanas, geckos, etc.), and tuataras

Tuataras (pictured) look like lizards, but they're pretty distinct. They lacks eardrums and earholes, for example.
Snakes and lizards are more closely related to each other than either is to tuataras.

Together, snakes and lizards are called squamates: "scaled ones."
To recap:
An alligator is more closely related to a pigeon than a turtle, and more closely related to a turtle than to a cobra.
A turtle is more closely related to a hawk than to an iguana.
An anaconda is more closely related to a gecko than to tortoise.

Simple right?

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with 𝕻𝖆𝖗𝖆𝖘𝖔𝖈𝖎𝖆𝖑𝖎𝖙𝖞

𝕻𝖆𝖗𝖆𝖘𝖔𝖈𝖎𝖆𝖑𝖎𝖙𝖞 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @parasociality

Feb 22, 2023
American conservatism has become increasingly low-status over a 30 year period (high in the Reagan years, downhill ever since).

Young women are generally more socially aware / less status-clueless than young men, and thus are reacting to this more strongly than young men.
When people refer to conservatism in America, what they usually mean is "movement conservatism."

Movement conservatism is not very old. It emerged from the collapse of the Old Right (Taft defeat in 1952) and the failure of John Birch / Joe McCarthy (McCarthy's censure in 1954).
Movement conservatism can plausibly be dated to 1955 (National Review founded), and it was crystallized by 1964 (Goldwater campaign).
Read 7 tweets
Feb 22, 2023
The decline of The Simpsons is often dated to "The Principal and the Pauper" (1997, Season 9). I disagree; there were many excellent Season 9 and 10 episodes after that.

If you want to know where the show fell down, look to "Bart to the Future" (2000, Season 11).
There were many wonderful things about classic The Simpsons. One of the best was Bart, the emotional core of the show for the first 10 seasons.

Bart is (was) an archetypical character: The Trickster.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trickster
With a Trickster at its core, The Simpsons had a timeless quality to it. Yeah, it was a cartoon for adults on Fox, but it stood within a mythic tradition.

And the public felt the connection and responded: "Bartmania."
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bart_Simp…
Read 23 tweets
Feb 21, 2023
Scott, "The Art of Not Being Governed"

"My thesis is... [that the Southeast Asian Massif or 'Zomia'] is the largest remaining region of the world whose peoples have not yet been fully incorporated into nation-states. Its days are numbered."
"Not so very long ago, however, such self-governing peoples were the great majority of humankind. Today, they are seen from the valley kingdoms as 'our living ancestors,' 'what we were like before we discovered wet-rice cultivation, Buddhism, & civilization.' On the contrary..."
"I argue that hill peoples are best understood as runaway, fugitive, maroon communities who have... been fleeing the oppressions of state-making projects in the valleys—slavery, conscription, corvée labor, epidemics, and warfare."
Read 7 tweets
Feb 21, 2023
Cool 🧵. I like Bones' juxtaposition of the dystopia and the fantasy, and the way they blur into each other.

I think this observation holds for a lot of dystopias. Nightmares are dreams, after all.
Sometimes, the ambiguity is so obvious that it can be assumed to be a deliberate choice of the author. Brave New World is as much a utopia as a dystopia.

Brave New World, for example. The strong utopian features force the reader to ask "is this a dream or a nightmare?"
In other cases, as in Bones' analysis of Tale, the fantasy elements creep in subtly, perhaps against the author's will.

1984 is an example. On the surface, 1984 is a crapsack world with no redeeming traits. But occasionally you see glimmers of a fierce, spiteful joy under it.
Read 6 tweets
Feb 21, 2023
Tends to support the Nakatani Akio / Thomas Brennan "nuclear weapons are a hoax or at least are not nearly as effective as advertised" thesis.
The argument would be that:
1) Nuclear weapons and the threat thereof are substantially fake.
2) The myth of nuclear weapons is convenient to the club of major powers.
Read 6 tweets
Aug 19, 2022
The Right severely underestimates the appeal of equality, or is even reflexively anti-equality.

Equality—including the dreaded "equality of outcome"—reduces opportunities for social division and makes the average person happier.

Equality can be both good politics & good policy.
The slogan "Liberté, égalité, fraternité" is astute, but badly ordered.

It should be: Égalité, fraternité, liberté.

Equality makes fraternity: social cohesion, group consciousness, goodwill, asibiyyah.

Fraternity makes liberty: the undivided are the unconquered.
Virtues are not context independent. Ignoring context and treating virtues as absolutes is a common flaw of unsophisticated political religions.
Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(