Cast your minds back a couple of months to LDR gate. Bristol City Council was criticised for questioning whether a local democracy reporter was supposed to be asking questions of mayor Marvin Rees at a regular press conference.
Local Democracy Reporters are BBC funded local journalists who are meant to make sure politics at council level are properly covered, and work for an array of local titles.
I’ve obtained some of the internal correspondence from Bristol City council about the incident under #FOI. The press conference took place well before the subsequent Twitter storm.
The head of press followed up with Bristol Live after the event. She claimed the question about the appropriateness of the Mayor taking an international flight to give a short Ted talk was "loaded" and "not impartial".
The mayor's chief of staff discussed writing to invited news outlets setting out the ground rules for events, suggesting:
"Your news outlet must send an employed news journalist to be granted entry. This does not include Local Democracy Reporters who are publicly funded”
There appears to have been a difference of opinion between the council and the paper about what LDRs do, and what previous agreements were about sending them to briefings.
A couple of weeks later, the tweet of the video of the event goes viral. The paper responds publicly. The council sticks to its guns that there was a previous agreement LDR's would not attend the press briefings.
The Mayor's chief of staff urges the paper not to respond further, saying "further comment would be extremely unhelpful in building a positive relationship. I would urge that you hold off on any further comment until we discuss further".
All in all, a rather fascinating insight into the relationships between local papers and council press offices in the LDR era. You can read all the correspondence which was recently published by the council on WhatDoTheyKnow here👇
Official government advice was sent to health ministers by WhatsApp and private email, posing a risk that key information about how the pandemic was handled has been lost, the transparency watchdog has found.
In an unprecedented move, the ICO has taken regulatory action over serious breaches of both transparency and data protection rules by the department.
It ordered the release of information from private emails to requestors and for information on private platforms to be preserved and secured, as it found the department had not taken adequate measures to keep records safe.
The ministry responded to #FOI requests within normal time limits on less than one in five occasions in the first quarter of this year. Including permitted extensions, it provided just 45 per cent of responses within legally mandatory timescales.
While by far the worst, DIT is not alone. The Department for Health and Social Care, Department for Culture Media and Sport and the Department for Business Energy and Industrial Strategy also regularly broke transparency law.
Loans meant to support desperate businesses through the pandemic were misused to fund gambling sprees, home improvements, cars, watches and garden refurbishments, a Times investigation has established.
In some cases, people even tried to smuggle suitcases filled with cash from Rishi Sunak's bounce back loans out of the country via airports.
The revelations, drawn from Insolvency Service records, raise questions for government about how seriously it took pandemic fraud.
Examples include:
•A gambler using a £50,000 bounce-back loan to fund poker games after claiming his company turned over £200,000, even though he only had £2.72 in his account.
• A pub landlord paying himself £30,000 after claiming one of the loans in “consultancy fees”.
Corporate responsibility minister Lord Callanan has launched an unprecedented attack on the Freedom of Information Act, describing the landmark transparency and anti-corruption law as "a truly malign piece of legislation.”
Callanan serves as the government’s UK champion for the Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (EITI), a role promoting transparency and anti-corruption measures in the oil and gas sector.
For some non-Covid news, and as a bit of recent political history, I’ve been released more than 100 pages of internal press office communications relating to the Home Office’s fried chicken box saga.
You may remember back in heady 2019 that there was an uproar after the government provided takeaway boxes with anti-knife crime messages to chicken shops around the country.
The campaign faced an immediate backlash, with critics questioning why fried chicken shops — stereotypically associated with young black communities — were being targeted by the Home Office for this campaign against knife crime.