Thread by @royal_reporter

Question: Have you noticed that the trolls are only focused on specific events? H&M were together in the UK for an estimated 18 months but all the commentary the trolls focus on are from very limited events.

So it got me thinking, what are they using M to cover up (besides the affair rumours)? Based on that, I remembered Prince Louis' christening. At the time, I remember gossip about Kate Middleton's strange behaviour. And even looking back at pictures, she seems a little off.

Even looking at Prince William in these photos, he looks stressed. But why would a person be sad and stressed at his son's christening?
"Kate Middleton Cracked a Hilarious Parenting Joke at Prince Louis's Christening." archive.ph/59KLj

In contrast, at Prince George's christening they both appeared happy. "Kate Middleton will use this lavish £11,000 item in Prince Louis’ christening… and it has a very special meaning." archive.ph/PLTEz

So, I'm assuming online trolls are being given talking points and posting guidelines. Hence why they only mention specific events/people and are only activated when H&M make announcement.

I can only assume the goal is to avoid people looking at the progression of Prince William and Kate Middleton's relationship. Because based on their body language, they have had some moments where it appears they don't want to be in each other's company.

Anyway. This is just a theory based on observing troll accounts behaviour. There seems to be a clear playbook. (For example, it took trolls a moment to respond to the 'Princess Meghan' trend. My guess they needed updated direction first.)

Great point.

https://twitter.com/Caeso_K/status/1559539195290554369?s=20&t=xgy38DYHqykW3rJD5hQYwQ

In theory, there are seven groups part of the coordinated targeted harassment against H&M. (Just for simplicity.)

Based on this classification, I'm going to assume which group pushes a certain narrative or action. (Feedback and suggestions are welcome.)

🐤 - The 'hateful individuals' are easy to understand. They hate H&M so they will just push any hateful narrative. No matter how contradictory or stupid. (Just my opinion)

🍊 - The British media are always desperate for any story about H&M. But it seems certain outlets are more desperate than others.

🤑 - The Royal Reporters are also desperate. Certain royal reporters will amplify any hateful narrative in order to get attention and money.

🛢- Kensington Palace is the one behind the fake bullying narratives. Clearly, they feel threatened by H&M. So it makes sense that they focus their attention on undermining H&M's character.

🦳 - Clarence House seems to be pushing the father/grandfather narrative. Every once in awhile stories will pop up about the relationship between Charles/Camilla and the Sussexes.

👺 - Buckingham Palace seems to be the source of the broken protocol and disrespecting QEII narratives. But this could have also been KP.

😈 - The unassociated people are probably the most dangerous. They will latch on to any hateful narrative but they then take it to unhinged heights (i.e. lying, photoshopping images, stalking, etc). Their belief in everything negative about H&M has consumed them completely.

👺 - I'm assuming Buckingham Palace is the source if the narrative 'she was welcomed with open arms'
🦳 - Then Clarence House would be the ones pushing the narrative of H&M coming back.
🛢 - And Kensington Palace is pushing poor William doesn't have a brother/relationship updates

I'm assuming based on the narratives from the palace, the British media, royal reporters, hateful individuals, and unassociated people then personalize the message.

Hence, the palaces direct 'how' to smear H&M (leaked stories, lies, fake investigations). Then the other groups fill in the 'why' it's important to attack H&M. Also, it explains why discrediting the #sussexsquad is always the priority of these groups.

H&M having supporters threatens this smear campaign. The #sussexsquad organically investing time and energy towards fighting back against the lies from these groups has made a quantifiable impact. So it makes sense that these groups are trying to discredit the #sussexsquad.

Great point.

https://twitter.com/809Matriarch/status/1559564479624536064?s=20&t=T-yCMQcPMzHzkRjax5risg

Also, has anyone classified the Royal Reporters in terms where they currently lean towards? For example, 🛢Kensington Palace has Richard Kay & Camilla Tominey, 🦳 Clarence House has Robert Jobson & Angela Levin, and 👺Buckingham Palace has Rebecca English & Richard Palmer.

Excellent point.

https://twitter.com/Lorrie_1983/status/1559576968114446340?s=20&t=T-yCMQcPMzHzkRjax5risg