We’ll begin with this clip of Dr Littman explaining ROGD
1/10
On August 16, 2018, PLOS ONE published @LisaLittman1’s study of 256 parental reports of adolescents experiencing a phenomenon described by Littman as ‘Rapid Onset Gender Dysphoria’ #ROGD
In this Youtube video Dr Littman gives her hypothesis on ROGD: 2/10
Littman coined the term #ROGD to describe this unexplained phenomenon.
In this compelling Youtube clip Dr Dave Bell describes the concerns in GIDS at the Tavistock about these GD teens
In the 1860s, German lawyer Karl Heinrich Ulrichs invented the concept of the gender soul to explain his own erotic interest in men. He could never possibly have imagined the far-reaching ramifications of his idea.1/10
Believing his attraction to men was caused by having a female soul in a male body, he wrote, “nature developed the physical male germ in us, yet mentally, the feminine one.” This distinction between the sex of the mind and the sex of the body has endured to the present day. 2/10
Christine Jorgensen’s doctor described a “female personality in a male body,” while Harry Benjamin referred to a “female soul in a male body.” John Money introduced gender to the medical lexicon, and Robert Stoller coined gender identity as one's sense of belonging to a sex. 3/10
In 1931, German physician Felix Abraham wrote the first scientific report on what he referred to as the “genitalumwandlung,” meaning genital transformation, of two “homosexual transvestites.” One of the men in the paper was Dora Richter. 1/9
The report is a detailed description, complete with photos, of the procedure which involved carving a cavity, lining it with skin grafts from the thigh, and inserting a sponge to prevent wound closure. Abraham strangely described it as “very easy” and only taking a short time.2/9
“I just wanted to give a description of the procedure itself, because I believe an infinite number of patients with these same inclinations exist, who desire similar procedures, but do not know of any means and ways to achieve same,” explained Abraham. 3/9
We're pleased that so many news outlets are reporting on the @thecassreview. It makes the #WPATHFiles even more relevant and considerably more damning.
The following thread contains a selection of articles and discussions on the report.
1//
The Times- Nine Key Findings From the Cass Review into gender transition.
A great morning session at @CanSG_org .
Beginning with Keynote speaker Prof. Riittakerttu Kaltiala and moving swiftly through talks by Prof. Michael Biggs, Prof. Susan Bewley, Dr Margaret McCartney, Dr Anna Hutchinson and Prof. Richard Byng.
Some slides from the talks. The recording will be available after the conference.
@CanSG_org The 2nd panel, Chaired by Dr Louise Irvine will cover 'Safeguarding gender-questioning children & young people in healthcare and education'.
It begins with GIDs whistleblower Sonia Appleby.
#FirstDoNoHarm
Sonia Appleby references the seminal report by Robert Francis KC- Mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust Public Inquiry, as part of her talk on Safeguarding and the role of trusts and boards to be open to hearing the first hand accounts of patients and staff concerns. "Organisations can hit the target, but miss the point" commonslibrary.parliament.uk/research-brief…
“Do we have to stick to penis & vagina norms? Can we have genitalia that looks like flowers or abstract sculpture? Can we have multiple? Can they be interchangeable?” -WPATH certified clinician Laura Jacobs, LCSW- WPATH SOC revision committee.
Credit: posted by @Jonnywsbell
@Jonnywsbell Maybe WPATH’s next “Standards of Care”will have a chapter on “abstract genitals”.
Seem far fetched? Remember, their current “Standards” introduced “eunuchs” who need their testicles removed.
It’s all “medically necessary” & “lifesaving” according to @wpath !
The #WPATHFiles Daily Disclosures: Surgeons discuss performing surgery on a 14-year-old kid. Their concerns are about being sued, dilation issues and what consent looks like. Marci Bowers, the President of WPATH, advises against it because the tissue is too immature.
They KNOW that consent is a murky area. In this clip, part of a different discussion, a WPATH member acknowledges kids' and parents' lack of understanding of the implications of these surgeries.
WPATH members should be discussing the ethics of operating on children who cannot give informed consent and whose parents do not understand the full implications of these procedures.
Read The WPATH Files:
Stay tuned for more WPATH Files Daily Disclosures!environmentalprogress.org/big-news/wpath…