I’m troubled by something happening in the #Episcopal Church that might interest followers of the #LambethConference hashtag. Our church is receiving clergy from ACNA and other breakaway churches back into our church as priests, and, well, it raises questions. 1/
My principal concern is that we seem to regard reception as a primarily canonical matter, and not giving sufficient consideration to the damage priests who have formerly worked against our church can do once they are received as clergy. 2/
The issue involves Canon III.10.3 on Clergy Ordained in the Historic Succession but Not in Communion with this Church. As I am not an expert in the field, I will leave the illumination of this canon to others. (page 99 if you are playing along at home.) But … 3/
Currently, we proceed as though folks who check the proper boxes, we have to receive them. As a result, Ellis and Cynthia Brust are now #Episcopal priests in the Diocese of Central Florida. This may startle folks with a memory of 2003-15 phase of the LGBT sexuality struggles. 4/
For much of that time, the Brusts were leaders in the fight to tear the Episcopal Church apart, take its property and have it removed from the Anglican Communion. We'd be replaced by organizations they led. 5/
Ellis Brust was CEO of the American Anglican Council from 2003-2006. These were the years of all kinds of anti-TEC and anti-LGBT maneuvering (the Chapman Memo, the Barfoot Memo. For details, see canticlecommunications.com/wp-content/upl…) 6/
In 2006, Ellis Brust become president and CEO of the Anglican Mission in America, the Rwandan sponsored front of the breakaway movement. Months before leaving, he had been an unsuccessful candidate for bishop of the Episcopal Diocese of South Carolina.
Brust went from being a candidate for bishop in the Diocese of South Carolina to leading an organization locked in a bitter property dispute with the Diocese of South Carolina in a matter of months. This raises certain issues of trust, yes? 7/
Cynthia Brust, who had been the spokesperson for the American Anglican Council left the AAC with Ellis and became the spokesperson for the AMiA. You can Google her. In fact, Google her and @revsusanrussell together for a good idea of what was happening at the time. 8/
The July-August 2020 edition of the Central Florida Episcopalian includes a feature about Cynthia Brust on Page 17 and a feature about how Ellis is living his dream on page 18. Not a word in either story about their time in the AAC and AMiA. 9/ issuu.com/cfepiscopalian…
I understand that there may be ACNA and AMiA priests who have felt their way toward the #Episcopal Church and might make good priests. But to my knowledge, neither Brust has said they were wrong either about LGBT people or their efforts to devastate our church. 10/
Can it really be that we have no way to protect ourselves against people who have done us grievous damage ? A four-day General Convention was not the place to deal with an issue previously on few people’s radar, but I am in hopes we can come up with a canonical fix in 2024. 11/11
12/11, if that's allowed: Part of what I'm saying is: If you once believed that churches backing kill the gays bills represent the Anglican tradition more faithfully than churches moving toward marriage equality, perhaps you owe us an explanation on how your thinking has changed.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I share a measure of the generally positive response to @JustinWelby’s speech on human sexuality at the #LambethConference. It is enormously helpful to have him acknowledge that churches moving towards marriage equality do not regard scripture lightly. 1/
It is also an enormous relief to have him announce he does not seek to punish member churches in the #Anglican Communion, because his predecessor was inventive and persistent in trying to do so. #LambethConference 2/
And I am grateful that in restating the uncontested fact that Lambeth 1.10 exists, he simultaneously took the legs out from under those at this #LambethConference who want to break the communion over this issue. 3/
The longer I look at the #LambethCalls on Anglican identity, the less I like it. What we have is one instrument of communion, the #LambethConference, asking another instrument of communion, the Abp of Canterbury to charter a group to review the instruments of communion. 1/
When you consider that every member of a third instrument of communion, the Primates Meeting, is included in the #LambethConference and recall that @JustinWelby has given primates much more influence over the fourth instrument of communion, the Anglican Consultative Council 2/
… you begin to see where this is going. The Anglican Consultative Council is the only instrument of communion that includes clergy and lay people. It is the instrument Welby has had the hardest time getting to do his bidding. 3/
News about how the #LambethCalls will be discussed and voted upon has finally been released. It would seem there is to be no floor debate, just small group conversation and report backs from some of the groups followed by voting yes, needs more work, or no. 1/ #LambethConference
The document contains no provision for offering amendments. So, without some kind of special provision, I don’t see how Lambeth 1.10 can be re-introduced. This is not to say shenanigans may not ensue. 2/ #LambethConference#LambethCalls
The feedback from the small groups will be given to a “Phase 3” implementation group. I didn’t know there were phases, or that we were all the way up 3. I suspect I am not alone in wanting to know who is in this group and who is in charge. 3/ #LambethConference#LambethCalls
.@JustinWelby has some explaining to do. Bishop Kevin Robertson, was a member of the group that drafted the controversial #LambethCall on Human Dignity. It never included a call to reaffirm the homophobic Lambeth 1.10. He doesn’t recognize it. 1/ facebook.com/684821280/post…
He writes: “I never agreed to this Call in its current form. At no point in our meetings did we discuss the reaffirmation of Lambeth 1.10 at the Conference, and it never appeared in any of the early drafts of our work together.” 2/
“I can confidently say that the Human Dignity Call in its current form does not represent the mind of the drafting group, and I distance myself from the reaffirmation of Lambeth 2.10 in the strongest possible ways.” 3/
“Receiving this document so late means that many of us are already in Europe; many of us have not had the time to truly read and study the Lambeth Calls; and there is no opportunity for reflection—or much organizing—before the Conference begins.” 1/
“It is hard not to assume that this is intentional. And it has left a poor taste in my mouth as I prepare for Lambeth. There ought to be no deceit in following Christ.” 2/