An anthology and follow-up to 'Art of Social Theory'. Includes chapters by key thinkers such as Karen Knorr-Cetina, Diane Vaughan, Stephen Turner, Karl Weick and James March.
A highly ambitious work in which Reed demonstrates how to construct 'maximal interpretations' - that is, historically specific and hermeneutically rich explanations of social phenomena
GT undoubtedly deserves mention in a thread on theorizing, and Charmaz' book represents one of the more methodologically mature approaches to theorizing in GT.
Discusses how visual thinking can be used as a tool for theorizing in sociology (see also the works of Estefan and Seim + Silver further down this thread)
Discusses Goffman's approach to theorizing, which allowed him to create theories that "reorder the world in a way that makes the read ... 'shudder' with recognition" (p. 138)
Shameless plug for Scandinavian readers: my own paper on why 'Abductive Analysis' should be applied not just to scientific theory but also to a range of non-scientific theories that are deserving of abductive refinement
"presents a range of strategies for constructing theories, and in a clear, rigorous, and imaginative manner, illustrates how they can be applied" (suggested by @syntheticvox)
“deals with different meanings of social theory, which form the basis of different answers to the question of the role of social theory” (suggested by @heldigt)
Argues that "writing claimed as theory is highly gendered and in this mirrors a range of processes in scholarship identified by feminist analysts" (suggested by @jana_bacevic)
Examines “sociology’s understanding of how classicality becomes established”, focusing on the neglected work of “Sweden's main candidate for a classic”, Gustaf F. Steffen (suggested by @rotosherranen)
There you go! As some have rightfully pointed out, there's a clear anglophile bias to my selection. I'd love to learn about contributions from other parts of the world too, especially if they deal with the topic differently.
One of my favorite books is Interaction Ritual Chains by Randall Collins (@sociologicaleye). This sees Collins theorize interaction ritual as the micro-sociological glue of society
IRC has been reworked a lot since Collins' 2004 book. Here's a thread on five key developments 🧵
But first, why care? In short, interaction rituals (re)produce social groups and give people a sense of belonging, meaning, and vitality. Without IRs, people become depressed, demoralized, and devoid of the energy needed to maintain social life.
And what *are* interaction rituals? Simply put, they're situations where people get together, focus on the same thing, and synchronize their behavior and emotions (e.g. "deep" conversations, wedding celebrations, funerals)