1/ Freeports are not Charter Cities, but even as they are they threaten to suck economic activity into areas with lower taxes and lighter regulation.
Freeports also facilitate crime, corruption, tax-dodging and money-laundering. So they are just what the Tories would like.
2/ But freeports can serve as a stepping stone to Charter Cities, which are basically privately controlled deregulated tax havens freed from democratic control. They're small versions of the kind of kleptocracy forecast by William Rees-Mogg in "The Sovereign Individual"
3/ Whether Freeports succeed or fail the Tory libertarians will use the outcome to argue that to make them more effective they should be augmented in ways that make them more like Charter Cities. That means making them more like deregulated tax havens.
4/ Tax havens are parasites. Their economic model can only work by sucking money out of normal economies. If the influx of tax-dodging money stopped tax havens would collapse.
5/ Tax havens facilitate crime, corruption, money-laundering and despotism on a global scale. By sucking money out of normal economies they force cuts in government services and increases in taxation, and by so doing they undermine democracy.
6/ Tax havens, whether in the form of nation states or Charter Cities are parasites that undermine democracy and drive the world towards the kleptocracy of William Rees-Mogg's "The Sovereign Individual".
7/ Tax havens and Charter Cities are weapons of mass destruction aimed at the annihilation of democracy. If we want democracy to survive we must wholly eradicate tax havens. That's why we need a global campaign –
1/ The Conservatives have been urged to clarify whether they will hand back about £500,000 of donations from a company linked to a Venezuelan-Italian banker charged with conspiracy, bribery and wire fraud in the US. theguardian.com/politics/2022/…
2/ Why was a Venezuelan-Italian banker allowed to donate to the Conservative Party? They ranted on and on about sovereignty. How does that fit taking foreign donations? It doesn't fit at all. The Tories are entirely happy about being bought by foreign money.
3/ The scandal is not just about foreign donations. It's about all big money donations.
Ben Elliot created an “advisory board” of donors who were granted privileged access to senior ministers and government officials in return for their £250,000 annual membership.
1/ Western democracy had it easy terms of enemies between 1945 until roughly around 2010. The Communists seemed menacing and had nuclear weapons. But their system had little appeal or money to attract Western elites
2/ Communism also was also at loggerheads with the far-right and therefore could not use far-right fear, hate and bigotry as political tools. The authoritarians of left and right were in general unable to work together against democracy.
3/ Communism gave Western democracy an excellent enemy to unite against. A brutal and hostile other against which democracy could be clearly defined, both in terms of values and patriotic resistance to a frightening enemy. Patriotism and democracy were welded together.
1/ Corbyn on pro-Iranian Al-Mayadeen TV saying "Pouring arms in isn't gonna bring back a solution." and calling for a ceasefire.
He wants to deny Ukraine the means to fight a genocidal invasion and a ceasefire which would let Russia continue its genocide in the occupied areas.
2/ Corbyn and Milne parroted Kremlin lies about Putin's 2014 invasion of Ukraine and Milne got a warm handshake from Putin in Sochi just six months after the invasion. When it comes to Russia Corbyn is often onside with the far-right.
3/ Corbyn cleverly talks about peace. But what he proposes for Ukraine would allow Russia's genocide to continue in the occupied areas and would weaken Ukraine's ability to resist Putin's genocidal aggression. In short Corbyn is supporting genocide.
1/ If I had shut up about Ukraine after Feb 24 I'd have about 7,000 more followers. There is something disturbingly parochial and insular about many opposition folk. One reason Brexit happened was because many Remainers weren't really interested in Europe.
2/ I'm serious about many Remainers not being interested in Europe before 2016. How many of us engaged with EU issues beyond those that directly impacted the UK? How many of us thought and acted as Europeans as well as Britons?
3/ I looked at the retweets for this. Very few are from the roughly 35k Remainers and opposition folk I follow. My impression is that most of them, while obviously supporting Ukraine, don't want to take an active interest in the conflict.
1/ Tony Blair has warned that the era of Western political and economic dominance is coming to an end, pointing to Russia's actions in Ukraine and the rise of China as the world's "second superpower".
2/ Blair is right about China, but wrong about Russia. Russia is a declining European imperial power which is desperately trying to ressurect its imperial glory, a project which is doomed to failure by its limited economic capacity.
3/ The dawning multipolar epoch is not something to be welcomed. In much of the non-Western world democracy is fragile or non-existent. In the West the forces of kleptofascism are attacking democracy from the inside.
1/ Kleptocrats and their political and media minions are a huge threat to democracy. They divide into two groups. The libertarians want to pretty much annihilate the state. The leeches on the other hand don't mind a big state so long as they can corruptly suck money out of it.
2/ Both kinds of kleptocrat want to subvert democracy, because they know a well informed electorate would never grant them their wishes. That's why both groups back a fascist/Putinist form of politics to make democracy an empty shell masking their power.
3/ Russia is a kleptofascist state in which kleptocrats & their minions leech off the state. Despite Tory talk about cutting taxes, the tsunami of Tory corruption indicates that the leeches have gained effective control over the Tory Party. Putinism has replaced Thatcherism.