This country continues to appease Trump to its ruin.

This case may have been brought—irresponsibly—by media outlets and Judicial Watch, but the GOP wanted this affidavit released to destroy the case against Trump.

And the judge is giving them their wish. cnn.com/politics/live-…
(PS) If you or I were the party whose premises had been searched in this case, the judge would have laughed in our faces at the notion that this affidavit would be released before prosecutors wanted it to be.

Politics poisons our criminal justice system—not the other way around.
(NOTE) This thread replies to the breaking news below. While DOJ will be able to seek some redactions, that it’s even having to jump through such hoops at this stage in its investigation is extraordinary—and is being done solely to appease Trump and the GOP, both of them lawless.
(NOTE2) I am happy to see—quite honestly!—that there is still optimism in the readers of this feed, who are saying that DOJ being able to seek redactions means this is a win for the DOJ.

What I am saying is that in a normal case the motion would simply have been denied. Also...
(NOTE3) ...the risk of angering the judge, who’s made clear he wants the affidavit released in some form, will likely make DOJ timid in suggesting its redactions, meaning that it may not seek all the redactions it could (after all, it wanted *none* of the affidavit released yet).
(NOTE4) I look at the case and compare it to cases that don’t involve politics—and see a chasm. Non-lawyers, I do understand, will look at this decision in a vacuum (Did the judge grant the media outlets’ demands entirely? No? Then it’s a win for DOJ). Two different perspectives.
(NOTE5) Maybe it works out. Maybe DOJ suggests redactions, the court rules they make the document incoherent—or in some way unfair to Trump—and decides that the whole thing must be kept sealed.

But *every time* we deviate from normal course of business we weaken the rule of law.
(NOTE6) The DOJ is learning how lawless those it is dealing with are. Doxxing, threats, selective leaks, political rhetoric that ignores rule of law and precedent, altered images of the judge, actual violence. DOJ must be America’s lion, now—and that means moving to indict Trump.
(NOTE7) The Trumpists must be taught that *every act of misconduct* will be met with a *greater* degree of—entirely legal and within-bounds—aggressiveness by DOJ. These lawless cretins know no other rule than the rule of power. And DOJ has plenty of power and authority to expend.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Seth Abramson

Seth Abramson Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @SethAbramson

Aug 18
(📢) Missed the release of PROOF OF COUP, the fourth book in the NYT-bestselling Proof series, last weekend? Just click below to access this 250-page exposé—full of shocking breaking news—about the January 6 coup plot at the Pentagon. (And please RETWEET!) sethabramson.substack.com/p/book-release…
(PS) Louie Gohmert is a key figure in PROOF OF COUP, as he was the earliest adopter of a pre-election conspiracy theory—undergirded by fake data—intended to justify Donald Trump stealing the 2020 election. The theory soon birthed the Waldron Plot, a coup plot at the Pentagon.
(PS2) A growing body of evidence suggests the Waldron Plot was presented in the Oval Office on December 21, 2020, with Gohmert present. As PROOF has written, it was shortly after this key meeting that Gohmert pursued a lawsuit intended to get SCOTUS to overturn the 2020 election.
Read 4 tweets
Aug 18
This is a win for Weisselberg. His cooperation agreement is obscenely narrow; it relates only to testifying truthfully to what he’s already admitting to in pleading. He’s not rolling on anyone or anything.

Pathetic performance by Bragg. Big win for Trump. nytimes.com/2022/08/17/nyr…
Understand that it’s factually inarguable that Donald Trump has been treated *far better* over the course of his lifetime than any defendant in modern American history. Every single prosecutor in a position to hold him accountable has blinked as if *terrified* of doing their job.
The cost of prosecutors coddling Trump—not to mention the whole Republican Party covering for him—is an unambiguous evil: witnesses afraid to come forward against him because they can see as the rest of us can that this career criminal and serial sexual assailant is “protected.”
Read 7 tweets
Aug 16
If he committed crimes, he should be convicted and punished.

Also want to remind everyone that Donald Trump raised hundreds of millions of dollars for a fake fund related to a fake cause using fake evidence and fraudulent language and DOJ felt it was OK. cnn.com/2022/08/16/pol…
Not only is there never a justification for whataboutism, but there’s never any necessity for it. A consistent belief in rule of law—for instance, no matter how rich, white or powerful a criminal is, they should be investigated, prosecuted, convicted and punished—works just fine.
The moment you say “What about...?” and ignore an event that’s just happened—like the Cox indictment—you’re speaking about politics rather than principles.

If you have principles and something has just happened that’s consistent with them, the right response is, “Yes, *and*...!”
Read 12 tweets
Aug 16
(📢) A *big* update to PROOF OF COUP—thanks to a reader!

The NYT published an HJ6C filing confirming the Pentagon coup plot author—Flynn associate Waldron—returned to the WH with Powell the next business day after December 18, 2020, further establishing the plot didn’t end then.
(PS) Not only that, but Waldron met at the WH with Mark Meadows—who Trump had just tasked with onboarding Powell as the new White House special counsel after Cipollone refused to acknowledge Trump’s unambiguous verbal appointment on December 18. So the plot went full speed ahead.
(PS2) If you haven’t read PROOF OF COUP, I’ll cut to the chase of what this seems to indicate: it’s now *likely* that a former Mike Flynn subordinate briefed the GOP’s House Freedom Caucus on a plot constituting Treason in the Oval Office—in Trump’s presence—on December 21, 2020.
Read 17 tweets
Aug 16
As I was misunderstood about a tweet earlier today I’ll explain it: Trump has a red USG passport; it’s not clear he (now) possesses it legally; *if* the FBI had seized it—which I said I doubted—the only reason I could imagine was that it’s contraband that could be used in flight.
If you’re reading—or have read—a Twitter feed that claims a lawyer who won his first first-degree murder trial in his 20s said the FBI can take anything it wants from anyone if it thinks that person *might* flee in the future, you need to reconsider trusting that Twitter account.
There are folks on this site only here to try to dunk on others—usually dishonestly. I’m here to share my work with people. I’m not here to take other Twitter users down with snark, misquotes, shaming, insults, &c. I avoid people who invest their time that way. It’s a huge waste.
Read 4 tweets
Aug 15
(NEWS QUIZ) How many TOTAL boxes of government records—that we know of—did Donald Trump abscond from the White House with over a several-month course of premeditated illicit conduct in 2020-21 (many of which boxes contained classified intel)?

{Source: sethabramson.substack.com/p/major-breaki….}
(PS) This question is not as easy as it seems. You have to have read a number of recent major-media news accounts and cross-referenced them to figure it out.
(PS2) In answering this, you may also find it interesting to think of any time you’ve moved from one house or apartment to another in the past. How many boxes is 10 boxes when it’s sitting in your living room ready to be moved? How big a stack of boxes is 20 boxes? 30? And so on.
Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(