Sugar consumption is strongly linked to cardiometabolic disease risk. Are non-nutritive sweeteners the answer? As we @acritschristoph@yerpal_mxval@lilyklau recently reviewed, the literature is highly conflicted. The microbiome may be the solution...🧵2/n ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/P…
Our @EranElinav@Elinav_Lab 2014 report in @Nature was the first to demonstrate that disruption of gut bacteria (microbiome) by non-nutritive sweeteners causes glucose intolerance and that in humans, the microbiome may modulate personalized risk... 3/🧵 nature.com/articles/natur…
To extend our findings beyond that proof-of-concept study, we randomized 120 individuals to consume saccharin, sucralose, stevia, aspartame, or controls. We monitored glucose tolerance for 4 weeks & profiled their gut & oral microbiome, blood metabolome & anthropometrics... 4/🧵
We found that the human gut & oral microbiome is altered following exposure to saccharin, sucralose, stevia, or aspartame = NOT INERT. We also found that saccharin and sucralose significantly impair glucose tolerance. Is the microbiome responsible? 6/🧵 cell.com/cell/fulltext/…
We extensively transplanted microbiomes of human donors to sweetener-naive germ-free mice. Glucose tolerance of these mice reflected that of their human donors, suggesting that the microbiome may mediate personalized impacts of sweeteners on glucose tolerance. 7/🧵
CONCLUSION: non-nutritive sweeteners are not inert to the human body or the gut microbiome, and we need to continue studying long-term effects, including with at-risk populations. Sugar is not the answer - we should all aim to reduce sweetness overall. 🥤 Fin/🧵
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Clinical efficacy: existing, but not as robust as we think for some of the most common conditions associated with probiotics, including gastroenteritis and C. difficile associated diarrhea. Meta-analyses should not replace high quality bias-free RCTs (2/9)
Can heterogeneity in efficacy relate to heterogeneity in colonization? data from our group and others point to inter-individual difference in both long-term colonization and even during supplementation. Why is this important? (3/9)