Something huge happened yesterday that the media apparently missed. In Parliament, I had been criticising the Liberal party for their drug policy and urging the Government to allow opioid replacement treatment to help treat people with heroin use problems.
🧵1/3
#springst
After I finished, it was pointed out to me that only a few hours earlier, @EmmaKealyMP had quietly announced a new policy to do exactly that!
2/3
This is a massive development. Allowing this treatment not only helps people who have problems with opioid use, it will help undermine organised crime and prevent petty crime.
3/3

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with David Limbrick MP 🌸

David Limbrick MP 🌸 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @_davidlimbrick

Dec 23, 2021
First hot take on the issue I've been pressing the most. Vaccine mandates and Section 10 of the Charter of Human Rights, relating to protection against medical procedures without full and free consent. 🧵
For those who have been arguing that the consent process is untainted, not even the Government agrees with you. They have openly admitted that it limits section 10(c) of the Victorian charter of human rights and responsibilities, as I have argued for ages now.
What does this mean? Well, the National Immunisation Handbook clearly outlines the procedures for legally valid consent, which Victoria appears to have admitted to undermining through mandates. Is consent legally valid? I guess the lawyers will have to argue that. Seems dodgy!
Read 6 tweets
Dec 18, 2021
It’s time to throw #sandinthegears of systematic segregation. Looks like we are in this for the long haul, even though they have relented on children. We need to raise the transaction cost of compliance. Thread 🧵
Firstly - any business that is strict in enforcement, make it hard for them. Don’t be mean or belligerent. But take your time. Don’t connect your checkin app, make them wait while you scroll through to find your immunisation certificate. Ask them questions. Ensure a queue forms.
Then never go there again. Give them a crap review. Tell your friends how terrible they are. You don’t need to feel guilty. They are collaborators with an inhumane system. They deserve it.
Read 5 tweets
Sep 8, 2021
The Australian Immunisation handbook section on obtaining legally valid consent is very well written and forms a sound basis for how to ensure patient consent is valid.

🧵1/5
However, we are now in a situation where it could be very reasonably argued that people are being pressured, coerced or manipulated into obtaining medical procedures.
2/5
Luckily, in Victoria, we have some protection against this type of Government tyrrany. The human rights charter. It specifically specifies that people shouldn’t be subjected to medical treatment without full and free consent.
3/5
Read 5 tweets
Aug 21, 2021
On the legality of public health directions. Many will know that I have been questioning the proportionality and whether they are the least restrictive of rights as required by the Public Health and Wellbeing Act. On 4th May 21, I asked the Attorney General this question

🧵1/6
For those that are sworn to protect and uphold the law, this is from the @VicOmbudsman report on housing tower lockdown - one of the very few situations where human rights and legality were investigated in detail. This is from her Foreword in the report. (my highlights)
2/6
Also in the report, there was also this comment in response from DHHS. "mental process" indeed. Despite my every effort, I cannot find anyone outside the Health Department that has admitted reading a charter assessment.
3/6
Read 6 tweets
Aug 30, 2020
Some of the reasons I oppose an extension to the emergency powers.

Thread
1/12
The Government has known from the start that they only had 6 months to use the extraordinary powers. They had time to come up with specific required regulations or solutions which were compatible with a free society.
2/12
However, their authoritarian tendency has blinded them to any option other than the stick. They have become totally dependent on it, not even attempting voluntary compliance. They say "this is the only option", but of course it's not.
3/12
Read 12 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(