“Burnout” is a particularly modern affliction, feeling simultaneously overwhelmed and paralyzed. I’ve found it’s best to think of burnout not as a disease but as a symptom, with many different etiologies. The big three: permanent on-call, broken steering, and mission doubt.
It used to be most jobs necessarily had to give you time off, because they could only be done from the office/factory/etc. The 24/7 on-call rotation was made possible thanks to the Magic of Technology(tm) (eg. 80s Doctors w pagers). Too long on-call causes mental breakdown.
Broken steering is a metaphor for that feeling at work where your actions seem to have no impact. Turn the wheel, car still goes straight. This is rare in blue collar work: the car got assembled, now you have car. It is common in knowledge work: you sent some email, so what?
(Broken steering destroys motivation because it breaks the core feedback loop which makes work rewarding. When you throw a rock in a pond and it makes a splash, there is a little feeling of power in the impact on the world. Take away the splash and the intrinsic reward dies.)
Mission doubt happens when you start asking, why am I doing this work at all? It is the most common when people are very comfortable. If you really need the money from this week’s paycheck, it’s obvious why you keep at it. What if you’d be fine for 6 months? 2 years?
So burnout is becoming more and more common because (a) we can work from anywhere and then have bad boundaries, (b) our work is increasingly abstract and it’s harder to tell if it matters, and (c) we are collectively richer than our ancestors.
If you find yourself feeling “burnout”, it can be good to consider which of these might be the cause. The solution to permanent on-call is more vacation and time-off. But that can actually make broken steering worse, where you need to instead increase your impact per unit work.
May all beings obey the inscrutable exhortations of their soul.
May all beings experience flow.
May all beings yearn for the vast and endless sea.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I got prescribed a drug you took once a day for ~120 days, preferably at the same hour. So I set an alarm on my phone, carried my pills with me everywhere, and took them. When my MD asked about compliance and I said I hadn’t missed any pills, they expressed significant surprise.
Reflecting on why I had such high consistency was interesting. There’s no way I’d have spontaneously remembered to take the pill at the same time without a system. I’m not particularly disciplined! I’d even say the opposite. I was surprised every evening when my alarm went off.
But I know that about myself and because I was carrying a cell phone I could have an alarm have the discipline for me. And because I love process design making myself a little process was fun and natural.
Catalysis lowers the free energy requirements to access some part of the state space. Constraint does the opposite by increasing instead.
So if you understand the world as a space subject to thermodynamics, catalysis and constraint are the two fundamental actions any agent can take to change the world.
Everything you do either constrains outcomes away from parts of the space, or catalyzes a pathway into a new part of the space. No other moves possible!
The idea of a sufficient statistic is one of the most powerful ideas that I somehow missed in my academic education even though I took a fair amount of statistics.
Like ~everything else in statistics, it was invented by Sir Ronald Fisher but had fallen out of favor because of the rise of descriptive statistics. With inferential statistics coming back in fashion sufficient statistics have come back too.
The formal definition for a sufficient statistic is basically a function over a whole set which suffices to infer any prediction you want of a given parameter. That's really abstract though and I don't find very useful.
Does an automated camera barking at people actually make them move? Who knows, but no one can accuse the dumb camera of discrimination — because it doesn’t discriminate on any basis at all, reasonable of wrong.
Someone decided that people loitering outside the store was a problem. Leave aside whether the problem is real or not — this is the solution? It is a need to be seen Doing Something, without risking failure.
In biochemistry there are “autocatalytic sets”. Each peptide catalyzes the formation of the next, until the last peptide catalyzes the production of the first one again. This is a “critical” system (criticality is ~the boundary between order and chaos) ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/P…
In a normal state space the % of critical states is small. Basically, it’s hard to find one sampling at random. They’re also not in any predictable place, there’s no way to know if a state is critical without testing it. So it seems finding those 3 ideas is impossible!
Yet all living things are critical systems like this. All life is built on those self-catalyzing cycles with no obvious source. As it is asked: “Which came first, the chicken or the egg?”
Apropos the recent controversy: the word delve is rarely used in English. Except used by LLMs, and in formal register Nigerian English.
This has sparked controversy bc making fun of someone for using “delve” and sounding like an AI (which it does indicate in a probabilistic way) could reasonably feel like an attack on a Nigerian using their formal register.
There has been a long trend in American culture against the formal register, it sounds pompous and ridiculous today. We have had a mass movement against the formal over the past 100 years (hoodies over suits, formal etiquette is dead, death of formal address like sir/maam).