re. Ross Coulhart's dumb sphere:
An artist who acquired several of these spheres from a value manufacturer drove through Jacksonville in 1971 and lost a few from the roof rack of his VW bus. This was reported back in 1974 but gotta keep an open mind, right?
It rolls because it's not perfectly round. It has bits inside from the re-machining process to make it rounder.
It's part of a ball check valve when covered in rubber. Comes in all sizes.
Does Ross chew ANYTHING before swallowing whole? #gullible#oneforthemoney
*valve manufacturer
Another possible origin of the Betz sphere: a nearby paper mill produced an identical one from their ball check valve back in 1974. But nope, it's from outer space I tell ya!
Another cause of "mysterious" spheres - this time the ones that fall out of the sky:
Hydrazine Propellant Tanks for Satellites and Spacecraft space-propulsion.com/spacecraft-pro…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
A photographer from the Daily Record was on @ALIEN_I_ADDICT's podcast - in 1993 he saw duplicates of all 6 Calvine negatives and talked about what he remembers.
His main takeaway was that Lindsay's print is out-of-focus compared to the negatives he saw. He recalls more detail on the craft (seams) and thought it looked metallic and manmade.
He thinks the photo is cropped, the negatives showed a little bit of landscape.
He addressed the reflection hypothesis but assumed the reflection would be symmetrical and the horizon would be visible (the water being darker than the sky). This is not necessarily true. A reflected rock can be framed with no far bank or horizon, only reflected sky:
Ross Coulthart awkwardly measured the circumference of Jim's ball at 32", diam = 10.2".
Let's call it 10" because he used a metal tape that doesn't curve when he could've used a piece of string or literally anything floppy, then measured the floppy thing like a smart person...
Jim's ball weighed 50.0lb.
This ball check valve manufacturer makes 10" balls that weigh 51.82lb, total diam. 11.81" - I assume this extra diam. is the rubber coating. Without it the ball would be a little lighter... perhaps 50lb? flomatic.com/valves/check-v…
Is this a coincidence? Maybe.
Anyway, given the apparent complete lack of recorded evidence that Jim's ball has ever done anything alieny, I think it's infinity times more likely that his ball is manmade than alien.
Ross Coulthart’s 7NEWS Spotlight “Out of this world” (Aug 21, 2022) promised us “conclusive proof”, “testable evidence of alien technology”, and a “renowned scientist” who “confirms it all”.
A THREAD where the only noteworthy thing you’ll get is Pink Floyd and one lady, briefly.
This is junk TV at its worst, exemplified by quickfire footage without context - unlabeled CGI aliens, CGI craft, flares, balloons, actual UAPs and overdubbed audio, and soundbytes to give the illusion people are claiming things they never claimed.
Who’s the disinfo agent here?
A few takeaways before we get to the meat of Jim’s ball, and I promise I won’t even mention the hexagonal balloon that Ross thinks is an “extraordinary” cube-shaped alien craft because he’s never heard of motion parallax or balloon festivals and didn’t even ask the pilot.
That remote in your car's cupholder signals an invisible dragon living in your garage to wake up and open the rollerdoor.
You can prove this is true by removing the remote's battery: the dragon no longer wakes up and the door doesn't roll open. #ThisIsUfology
The invisible dragon in your garage is Sagan's well-known explanation of pseudoscience.
Ufology's "just so" stories are one example taken to the extreme - pile conspiracy upon conspiracy to explain events with ordinary explanations.
"Your inability to invalidate my hypothesis is not at all the same thing as proving it true." - Carl Sagan
Westall 1966: Dozens of witness accounts, many of them conflicting impossibly. There is no grand unifying theory that can reconcile everything.
To get close to the truth, it's time to accept that some accounts are misremembered, exaggerated, or outright fabricated.
A researcher collecting these accounts is doing "research", for sure - but failing to use any discernment whatsoever makes the researcher a witness advocate, not a solver-of-mysteries.
Add financial and emotional stakes, and we will get nowhere.
We have hundreds of data points for Westall, and a rational appraisal means some of those points cannot reflect reality.
Any theory about what happened that day will require some data points to be ignored. That doesn't necessarily make the theory invalid.
Cynthia Hind was a UFO enthusiast in Harare, Zimbabwe, with a newsletter. She once wrote sometimes there wasn't much to report (in all of Africa!).
When she arrived at Ariel on Tuesday 20th, she seemed excited about her chance to put Africa on the map...
In front of the kids and a bemused headmaster, she said:
"They did tell me from London this could be the biggest story of the 20th century... Also, America’s been on the line.”
Hind tells the kids: “I think it’s time the world woke up that something’s going on and they don’t all think I’m a kooky character.”
Thus placing on their shoulders the burden of convincing the world she’s not crazy.