Inverse relationship between rhinovirus & SARS-CoV-2 still holding strong. Seems clear some form of viral interference is happening here. But is the causation all one way (SARS2-->RV) or does it go both ways? As someone likely suffering an RV infection right now, I'm curious 1/10
There is some evidence that rhinovirus infection protects against Covid by activating interferon-stimulated genes (ISG). ISG are activated upon SARS-CoV-2 infection as well, but with a delay that allows the virus to replicate & establish infection. 2/10 rupress.org/jem/article-st…
Here's another 2021 study showing experimental evidence that RV impedes Covid. Remarkably, SARS-CoV-2 was inhibited even when rhinovirus was introduced 24 hours after inoculation. 3/10 academic.oup.com/jid/article/22…
By blocking the interferon response stimulated by RV infection, the experimenters proved that it was through the stimulating the innate interferon response that RV interferes with SARS-CoV-2. 4/10
At least one eminent virologist and rhinovirus specialist maintains the viral interference between SARS-CoV-2 and rhinovirus works both ways, as one would expect, even if the interferon response to Covid is somewhat weaker than that evoked by RVs. 5/10
It seems to be generally accepted that a large rhinovirus wave that accompanied the start of the school year in some European countries in 2009 delayed the onset of the H1N1 pandemic flu ("swine flu") waves there. 6/10
More recent research seems to confirm what was suspected at the time: rhinovirus infection provides protection against influenza A. 7/10
BTW, I'm not trying to make a point here, certainly not that we should seek out RV infection to prevent flu or Covid—RV is making me quite miserable right now. I want to avoid future RV infection as much as possible. I just find this all fascinating. 8/10
Viral interference happens with other viruses as well, and the original Omicron wave drove down the prevalence of almost all other respiratory viruses with one very strange exception: the seasonal coronaviruses. I still don't understand that one. 9/10
Usual caveat: I'm not an expert in these matters and have likely left out important considerations or said something stupid. Corrections & additional information from genuine experts (& others) welcome. 10/10
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Very proud to be a co-author on this comprehensive preprint on the novel, growing saltation lineage BA.3.2, together with @Tuliodna, Darren Martin, Dikeledi Kekana, and lead author @graemedor. 1/9
I would normally write a summary 🧵 of the BA.3.2 mutational analysis here, but as much of my contribution parallels my previous BA.3.2 threads I'll just link to those here, w/brief descriptions of each.
BA.3.2 emerged in Nov 2024 after ~3 years of intrahost evolution with >50 new spike AA muts, but since then, it's changed very little. Could the drug molnupiravir (MOV) galvanize BA.3.2 into pursuing new evolutionary paths? A new 89-mut MOV BA.3.2 seq suggests it could. 1/11
Background on MOV: It's a mutagenic drug. Its purpose is to cause so many mutations that the virus becomes unviable & is cleared. But we've long known this often does not happen. Instead, the virus persists in highly mutated form & can be transmitted. 2/
I was an author on a paper published in @Nature that conclusively showed not only that MOV has created highly mutated, persistent viruses, but that these viruses have transmitted numerous times. See 🧵 below by lead author @theosanderson. 3/
The most valuable viral research tools—@nextstrain & CovSpectrum—are being destroyed, not only blocked from new data but now forbidden from even sharing info from the PAST. Why?
Because GISAID is run dictatorially by a con man, paranoid egomaniac, & liar named Peter Bogner. 1/
I use CovSpectrum & Nextstrain every day—& I'm not the only one. Every Covid thread I've ever posted here has relied partly on CovSpectrum & Nextstrain for information & visuals. These vital tools have now been stolen from us by a world-class grifter. 2/ thinkglobalhealth.org/article/to-fin…
For years scientists knew something was very, very wrong with GISAID, but the breakout story (from which much of this 🧵is based) came 2 years ago in @ScienceMagazine from @sciencecohen & Martin Enserik. 3/ science.org/content/articl…
3/77 sequences from the latest Netherlands upload are BA.3.2 as well as 4/86 seqs from Queensland, Australia, consistent w/the steady, slow growth we've seen in Germany, the UK, Ireland, & much of Australia. 1/4
One interesting (and possibly coincidental) aspect of the BA.3.2 tree: Two large branches have NSP14 mutations at adjacent AA residues—ORF1b:T1896I and ORF1b:H1897Y. 2/4
I don't have any idea what functional effects either of these mutations would have. They are both C->T mutations, which is the most common type, but they've been relatively uncommon throughout the pandemic, with fewer than 8000 sequences combined. 3/4
The first instance involved a small cluster of sequences that hospitalized several people & resulted in the death of a young child in early 2022. More on this one later. 2/15
The most recent example requires some background. In late 2024, a spectacularly mutated Delta appeared in Spain with 40 new spike mutations and numerous Cryptic markers.
Normally, I would write a thread about such a remarkable sequence, but there were some issues... 3/15
@StuartTurville has pointed out that WA delayed Covid spread longer than elsewhere in Australia. China has a somewhat similar immune history (as do other SE Asian countries). Perhaps BA.3.2 will do well in China once it arrives there? 2/4