A LinkedIn post by Sarah Hartley-Kane on the UK becoming the 'Silicon Valley of Global Genomics' linkedin.com/posts/sarahhk_…
The cost of a whole genome is probably already in the $100 mark, but not widely available: the only companies that have shown realistic goals towards the $100 genome are: MGI Tech with their DNBSEQ-T7 and T10x4 large instruments, together with @UltimaGenomics with their U100 ...
which is expected to be commercially available in 2023 and produces $1/Gb reads (albeit short-reads with homopolymer noise), and $ONT.L Oxford @nanopore, which is currently closing into the $2/Gb mark of Q20+ single pass reads on the PromethION flowcells
So how far are we from the $100 Genome and who is closer? By the looks of it, MGI Tech is the closest to dethrone $ILMN Illumina in producing 2x150bp Q30 short-reads at $1/Gb, but it will take time for them to be commercially available worldwide with the T7/T10x4 sequencers.
Then @UltimaGenomics is probably the closest to be able to produce $1/Gb short-reads, and sell them as part of $1-3M+ sequencing factory setups, initially in the US then later in other territories. These $1/Gb short-reads are single-end and have homopolymers issues.
Finally, $ONT.L Oxford @nanopore is in the $6-2/Gb range now with their PromethION line, and have been previously criticized for the low basecalling quality of their single-pass reads, but since Kit14 became available 4-6 weeks ago, the status quo has changed: it is now ...
... a new reality that Kit14 can produce consistently $4-3/Gb runs of Q20+ single-pass reads, which for human genome sequencing could mean a 20x QV50+ (consensus) for 99% of the genome. That still is not $1/Gb Q30 long-reads mark, but at the same time one can get there with ...
... a much lower CAPEX starting point, with the P2/P2 Solo now putting NovaSeq levels of $/Gb with a CAPEX of a fraction of a mid-throughput sequencer (NextSeq/AVITI/G4/G400)
So all in all, the $100 Genome is closer than many people think, and it will change the way we understand the field of #genomics and #multiomics, both in scientific terms but also in market share terms.
On library prep at #Nanoporeconf, a description for PCR-free methods showing the difference between ligation (max output) and rapid mode (10minutes, minimal lab equipment needed). Ultralong reads (ULR) also enabled, all Kit14.
Rapid ULR. Current record is about 4 megabases.
PCR expansion kits enable the use of samples with low input amount.
I did a deep dive on the different workflow management (WFM) tools for #Bioinformatics Data Analysis a few years ago, and since then there have been a few extra entrants in this segment, still mostly concentrated in serving the Next-Generation Sequencing field.
A few years ago, there were two communities dominating the open-source WFM ecosystem in NextFlow and SnakeMake, and two platforms dominating the the commercial offerings in DNAnexus and Illumina BaseSpace.
Since then, a company out of the founders of Nextflow has started offering enterprise support for Nextflow workflows in the cloud: Seqera Labs. They offer the extra level of support that some organizations require to run Nextflow on their Data Analysis setups.
More interesting Next-Generation Sequencing knowledge in the ASeq Discord channel (by @new299). Illumina patterned flowcells and the etching process to "print" the wells into the flowcell. Could be down to 350nm diameter for some flowcell configurations now.
If I remember correctly, Illumina started with a 600nm diameter for the patterned flowcell, in the HiSeq X and then later on in the evolution of the platform that used these patterned flowcells.
They then said to have gone down to 500nm, and what you are showing seems to indicate that it's at 350nm now, at least for the NextSeq 2000? I am not sure if they claimed that for NovaSeq X?
There have been some acquisitions in #CancerDiagnostics and #CancerScreening recently, some of which signify a trend towards consolidation that is worth describing:
$A Agilent is moving towards some more vertical integration in Cancer Dx and Cancer screening
by recently acquiring both announcing a partnership with Akoya Bio and announcing the acquisition of Avida Biomed.
Some may ask: isn’t $A Agilent too small to go into this field? Would they be able to compete against $ILMN Illumina/GrailBio or $GH Guardant Health or $EXAS Exact Sciences?
It is likely that as Spatial Biology tools become more robust and user-friendly, they will become increasingly popular and widely adopted in the scientific community.
This may lead to a shift in the balance between single-cell and Spatial Biology approaches, with the latter eventually becoming more prevalent.
Additionally, as more and more datasets are generated using Spatial Biology techniques, the field of Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence will likely play an increasingly important role in analysing and interpreting this data.