Now that the FSB is claiming #Dugina was killed by a Ukrainian who fled to Estonia, it is interesting to note how often the Kremlin seems not to appreciate the dangers in trying to explain reverses away by, frankly, incompetence. A short thread 1/
Consider the supply depots blowing up because, allegedly, of an incautious cigarette. OK, I get the desire to deny that Ukraine can accurately and effectively target these hubs, but it means embracing a notion that incompetents set them up and other incompetents manned them 2/
Now, we have the claim that a Ukrainian with a 12-year-old in tow carried out the attack, trailing Dugina in a mini with multiple number plates, then insouciantly headed for the Estonian border and passed through without any hitch 3/
Who knows, maybe it's true, but it also would suggest a pretty major failure on the past of the MVD/FSB. I think this is a major Kremlin blind spot, to fail to appreciate how its evolving narrative is actually painting it as incompetent (as it often is, it has to be said) 4/
This is, after all, central to the nationalist critique of Putin's - that for all his macho managerialism, be is actually a poor champion of Russian interests, irresolute, corrupt and incompetent. How many less rabid types may also be feeling this, as they wonder... 5/
...If they might be next to be targeted? Fear can be a useful tool of the state - but not if people don't think the state can also offer security. Sure, blaming Kyiv is easy and we'll no doubt see some retaliation on Wednesday (Ukraine's Independence Day), but in the long term 6/
I suspect this will be more corrosive for the Kremlin's myth of competence and narrative of victory. 7/end
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I am sceptical that there is any succession struggle yet - I think it would be too dangerous and I’m not convinced many of the potential 'successors' listed her are viable. Instead, I think this is more of a response to unpredictable and changing political times 1/
No one really knows how things will develop, and hence there are technocrats keeping a low profile, hawks making hay while they can, and former presumed doves like Medvedev trying to rebrand themselves as the hawkiest hawks around 2/
However, taking Medvedev as an example, I don’t this is is because of ambitions to rise so much as a desperation not to fall - with no real allies or credibility, regarded with contempt or mistrust by the ascendant siloviki, he is trying to present himself as a convert 3/
This to me looks like what in Russian criminal terms is an obshchak, a common fund used by a gang as both operational reserves and for the leaders to dip into 1/
I can't help but plug firstly as I wrote in my book The Vory, a striking feature of Putin's regime has been the adoption of (some) criminal slang and techniques by his elite 2/ yalebooks.yale.edu/book/978030024…
And, as I say in We Need To Talk About Putin, it's not so much that - since his earlier years in office - VVP himself has solicited this money (his real wealth is power), but that it has gravitated towards him and his obshchak 3/ penguin.co.uk/books/111/1117…
Natalia Poklonskaya, sacked from her job as deputy head of Rossotrudnichestvo, is now an adviser to Prosecutor General Krasnov. This is interesting for a few wider reasons – a thread 1/ rbc.ru/politics/14/06…
First of all, Poklonskaya’s trajectory has been from Crimean prosecutor, Moscow mouthpiece and subject of a whole genre of anime fan art to… 2/ bbc.co.uk/news/blogs-new…
…Increasingly critical and independent voice once the Kremlin tried to co-opt her. This is one of the challenges it has when it builds people up to try and use them. 3/ buzzsprout.com/1026985/9104260
As I continue to follow Secretary of the Security Council Nikolai Patrushev’s, descent into conspiracy theory lunacy, he gave an interview with AiF about the ‘special operation’ in Ukraine. A short thread on the 'high'lights. 1/ aif.ru/politics/world…
Not just the usual racially-profiling broadsides at those nasty ‘Anglo-Saxons’ he also trots out the tired conspiracy theory of the ‘golden billion,’ the idea that there is a secret and deliberate plan to allow an elite will prosper at the expense of everyone else 2/
(Sure, one could argue that in many ways this is the natural logic of market capitalism, but to present this as (a) a deliberate conspiracy and (b) something the Russians wouldn’t be eagerly embracing if they could, is pretty far-fetched, even for NP.) 3/
Let's deconstruct Putin's alleged 'military career'
I was struck by this claim of his, reported in @thetimes in the context of (credible) claims he is micromanaging the war effort. A short thread 1/
Yes, like every young man at a Soviet uni, he received draft deferment at the price of having to do reserve officer training during his studies. That said, those who went through this attest to the fact that unless you were keen, this could largely be coasted through. 2/
It certainly was a commitment far lower than ROTC or the UK's Army Officer Scholarship Scheme, which are direct feeds into mil service. Like so many Sov practices, it tended to be characterised by bureaucratism, presentism and a desire on most people's parts just to get by 3/
"The Ukrainian army is an amazing and very strong combination of a Russian soldier, a fascist officer and an American general"
The convolutions hardline Russian commentators must go through to explain their failures in #UkraineRussianWar. A short thread 1/ kp.ru/daily/27391/45…
It is, of course, quite a challenge how to pivot from "we will be welcomed" to "we are being hammered" but Russia's propagandists are doing their best. Markov's article, linked in the first tweet, is a better example than most 2/
1st, the need to share the blame: "The Ukrainian army turned out to be much stronger than it was supposed, looking from Russia, and much stronger than it was seen by Western analysts" - ie, we were no more wrong than anyone else 3/